Literature DB >> 33837418

Second-generation laser balloon ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous rhythm monitoring: the LIGHT-AF study.

Giovanni Rovaris1, Giuseppe Ciconte2, Marco Schiavone3, Gianfranco Mitacchione3, Alessio Gasperetti3, Elena Piazzi1, Gabriele Negro2, Elisabetta Montemerlo1, Roberto Rondine2, Mattia Pozzi1, Mirko Casiraghi1, Sergio De Ceglia1, Daniele Giacopelli4,5, Maurizio Viecca3, Gabriele Vicedomini2, Giovanni B Forleo3, Carlo Pappone2,6.   

Abstract

AIMS: Balloon-based technologies have been developed to simplify catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), to improve the clinical outcome of the procedure and to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of second-generation laser balloon (LB2) ablation in the treatment of AF using a continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring strategy. Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATas) recurrences were assessed with implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) or devices. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All patients underwent LB2 ablation procedure. The primary endpoint was the first recurrence of any, >5.5 and >24 h duration ATas after the blanking period (90 days). In-hospital visits were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Seventy-three patients (68% male, mean age 59.8 ± 11.3) were included in the study. The average procedure, fluoroscopy, and laser ablation times were 81.5 ± 30.1, 21.5 ± 12.4, and 33.8 ± 9.7, respectively. All PVs were isolated using the LB2 with no need of touch-up using focal catheters. No major complications occurred during or after the procedures. The one-year freedom from recurrences was 66.9% (95% CI: 57.0-76.7%), 81.0% (69.5-88.5%), and 86.8% (76.1-92.9%) considering any, 5.5-h and 24-h cut-off duration, respectively. At 3, 6, and 12 months, any ATas was recorded in 22%, 32%, and 25% of patients, with a ≥5% arrhythmic burden documented in 4%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. Few patients reported AF-related symptoms (7%, 8%, and 5%).
CONCLUSION: LB2 ablation is a safe and effective procedure, showing a high freedom from recurrences and low arrhythmic burden as documented by a continuous rhythm monitoring strategy. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Continuous rhythm monitoring; Implantable cardiac monitors; Laser balloon ablation; Pulmonary vein isolation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33837418     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  4 in total

1.  Higher serum sST2 is associated with increased left atrial low-voltage areas and atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Jiali Fan; Yuan Li; Qing Yan; Wenhuan Wu; Pan Xu; Lu Liu; Chunhong Luan; Juanli Zhang; Qiangsun Zheng; Jiahong Xue
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  Factors affecting signal quality in implantable cardiac monitors with long sensing vector.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Claudia Amellone; Riccardo Sacchi; Leonida Lombardi; Maria Teresa Lucciola; Valentina Scotti; Maurizio Viecca; Marco Schiavone; Daniele Giacopelli; Massimo Giammaria
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-21

3.  Evaluation of linear lesion formation and thermodynamics by dragging ablation with the third-generation laser balloon.

Authors:  Takahiko Nagase; So Asano; Hiroshi Fukunaga; Yuhei Kasai; Kanki Inoue; Yukio Sekiguchi; Kohei Tanizaki; Tatsuya Murai; Mamoru Nanasato; Jun Umemura; Junichi Nitta; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-04-15

4.  Clinical Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in COVID-19 Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cardiac Arrhythmia Center after Hospital Discharge.

Authors:  Marco Schiavone; Fabiola B Sozzi; Alessio Gasperetti; Cecilia Gobbi; Elisa Gherbesi; Lucia Barbieri; Roberto Arosio; Gianfranco Mitacchione; Filippo Toriello; Andrea Faggiano; Maurizio Viecca; Giovanni B Forleo; Stefano Carugo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.