Literature DB >> 33837298

Media portrayal of spinal cord injury and its impact on lived experiences: a phenomological study.

Leanne Rees1, Merryn Sherwood2, Nora Shields3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a qualitative, phenomenological study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate media portrayal of spinal cord injury (SCI) as perceived by people with SCI and explore its impact on their lived experience.
SETTING: People with SCI living in Australia.
METHOD: Twenty-four participants, recruited using purposive and snowball sampling, completed in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Thematic data analysis followed an inductive, iterative process.
RESULTS: Participants perceived media portrayed SCI through a narrow lens, describing how people with SCI were 'absent' or portrayed as either 'pity or pedestal'. Participants said media portrayed an inaccurate picture of their lived experience that perpetuated misunderstandings of SCI. This portrayal fostered unreasonable public expectations and assumptions about living with SCI, which presented in the participant's lives as uncomfortable interactions and inappropriate remarks. The impact for participants was a burden to explain SCI and justify what it meant for them. People with SCI would like media to portray a broader, more authentic representation of SCI to improve public understanding and to reduce the negative impact on their lives.
CONCLUSION: People with SCI perceived a narrow and inaccurate portrayal of SCI in media that overlooked potential quality of life, overshadowed health and life domains they considered important and reinforced the idea that SCI can be overcome. People with SCI were mostly concerned with what was absent in media portrayal of SCI rather than what was present. Action for change lies in promoting information, expanding narratives and raising awareness to diverse abilities of people with SCI.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33837298     DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00630-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  10 in total

Review 1.  The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa A Simpson; Janice J Eng; Jane T C Hsieh; Dalton L Wolfe
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R N Barker; M D Kendall; D I Amsters; K J Pershouse; T P Haines; P Kuipers
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a comparison across six countries.

Authors:  S Geyh; C Ballert; A Sinnott; S Charlifue; A Catz; J M D'Andrea Greve; M W M Post
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Client Perspectives on Reclaiming Participation After a Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa.

Authors:  Conran Joseph; Kerstin Wahman; Julie Phillips; Lena Nilsson Wikmar
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04-14

6.  Life satisfaction, appraisals and functional outcomes in spinal cord-injured people living in the community.

Authors:  P Kennedy; E Smithson; M McClelland; D Short; J Royle; C Wilson
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Exploring quality of life following high spinal cord injury: a review and critique.

Authors:  K Whalley Hammell
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Facilitators and barriers to social and community participation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Linda Barclay; Rachael McDonald; Primrose Lentin; Helen Bourke-Taylor
Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.856

9.  Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology.

Authors:  Annelie J Sundler; Elisabeth Lindberg; Christina Nilsson; Lina Palmér
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-04-07

10.  Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury: the methodology and results of a British priority setting partnership.

Authors:  J J van Middendorp; H C Allison; S Ahuja; D Bracher; C Dyson; J Fairbank; A Gall; A Glover; L Gray; W El Masri; A Uttridge; K Cowan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.772

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.