| Literature DB >> 33836604 |
Larry Zeitlin1, Robert W Cross2,3, Joan B Geisbert2,3, Viktoriya Borisevich2,3, Krystle N Agans2,3, Abhishek N Prasad2,3, Sven Enterlein4, M Javad Aman4, Zachary A Bornholdt5, Miles B Brennan5, Lioudmila Campbell5, Do Kim5, Neil Mlakar5, Crystal L Moyer5, Michael H Pauly5, William Shestowsky5, Kevin J Whaley5, Karla A Fenton2,3, Thomas W Geisbert2,3.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has reemphasized the need to identify safe and scalable therapeutics to slow or reverse symptoms of disease caused by newly emerging and reemerging viral pathogens. Recent clinical successes of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in therapy for viral infections demonstrate that mAbs offer a solution for these emerging biothreats. We have explored this with respect to Junin virus (JUNV), an arenavirus classified as a category A high-priority agent and the causative agent of Argentine hemorrhagic fever (AHF). There are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs available for preventing or treating AHF, although immune plasma from convalescent patients is used routinely to treat active infections. However, immune plasma is severely limited in quantity, highly variable in quality, and poses significant safety risks including the transmission of transfusion-borne diseases. mAbs offer a highly specific and consistently potent alternative to immune plasma that can be manufactured at large scale. We previously described a chimeric mAb, cJ199, that provided protection in a guinea pig model of AHF. To adapt this mAb to a format more suitable for clinical use, we humanized the mAb (hu199) and evaluated it in a cynomolgus monkey model of AHF with two JUNV isolates, Romero and Espindola. While untreated control animals experienced 100% lethality, all animals treated with hu199 at 6 d postinoculation (dpi) survived, and 50% of animals treated at 8 dpi survived. mAbs like hu199 may offer a safer, scalable, and more reproducible alternative to immune plasma for rare viral diseases that have epidemic potential.Entities:
Keywords: Junin; hemorrhagic fever; monoclonal; therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33836604 PMCID: PMC7980402 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023332118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Comparison of the chimeric mAb cJ199 and the humanized version hu199. (A). Neutralization activity as assessed using a plaque reduction assay with strain Candid #1. The percent inhibition of viral infection is displayed on the y-axis. Plotted points are the average of two replicates, with error bars denoting SD. (B) Protective efficacy in guinea pigs challenged with JUNV (Romero). (Upper) The experimental timeline for challenge and treatment with either cJ199 or hu199. Groups of animals (n = 6 per treatment group; n = 2 for the control group) were inoculated i.p. with virus (1,000 PFU) and treated with either a single dose i.p. (10 mg at 6 dpi; “x1”) or two doses (10 mg at 6 dpi and 5 mg at 10 dpi; “x2”). (Lower) Survival curves showing statistically significant (P < 0.05, log-rank test) protective efficacy in all treated groups compared with untreated controls.
Fig. 2.Therapeutic efficacy of hu199 in NHPs inoculated with JUNV (Espindola, left column; Romero, right column). Survival: NHPs were inoculated with 5000 PFU of Romero or 5000 PFU of Espindola. NHPs were treated with hu199 (50 mg/kg) at either 6 dpi (D6) or 8 dpi (D8). Survival was significantly better in the treated groups than in the historical controls (P < 0.05). Weight, temperature, viral load, and clinical score figures: Data from animals that succumbed to disease are represented by dashed lines. The horizonal dashed lines represent baseline weight and temperature (weight and temperature figures), the limit of detection for the assay (viral load figures), or the clinical score that triggers euthanasia according to the IACUC-approved protocol (clinical score figures).
Viral load in selected tissues on necropsy
| NHP | Virus | Treatment | Outcome | dpi of death/necropsy | Viral titer (log10 PFU/g) | |||
| Liver | Spleen | Brain (frontal) | Brain (stem) | |||||
| 1 | Espindola | D6 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Espindola | D6 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Espindola | D6 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Espindola | D6 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Espindola | D8 | Died | 34 | 0 | 3.1 | 5.1 | 5.7 |
| 6 | Espindola | D8 | Died | 24 | 4.6 | 4.5 | NT | NT |
| 7 | Espindola | D8 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | Espindola | D8 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 |
| CE | Espindola | In-study control | Died | 15 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 3.4 |
| HCE1 | Espindola | Historical control | Died | 21 | 6.3 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 6.0 |
| HCE2 | Espindola | Historical control | Died | 14 | 7.5 | 5.3 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| 9 | Romero | D8 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Romero | D8 | Died | 26 | 3.1 | 3.5 | NT | NT |
| 11 | Romero | D8 | Died | 23 | 2.9 | 2.7 | NT | NT |
| 12 | Romero | D8 | Survived | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CR | Romero | In-study control | Died | 22 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 6.4 | 5.8 |
| HCR1 | Romero | Historical control | Died | 13 | 8.0 | 7.5 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| HCR2 | Romero | Historical control | Died | 21 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 5.5 | 4.9 |
NT, not tested.
Fig. 3.Clinical observations of JUNV-inoculated NHPs. Note that these observations do not include all factors used in determining the clinical score depicted in Fig. 2. Solid gray boxes indicate that no observations were obtained because the animal had previously succumbed to infection. Rx, treatment group; Esp, Espindola; Rom, Romero; HCE, historical control inoculated with Espindola; HCR, historical control inoculated with Romero.