Literature DB >> 33836555

Venetoclax combinations induce high response rates in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy in routine practice.

Arie Apel1, Yakir Moshe2, Yishai Ofran3,4, Alexander Gural5, Ofir Wolach6,7, Chezi Ganzel8,9, Jonathan Canaani10, Miri Zektser11, Adrian Duek12, Galia Stemer13, Ilana Hellman14, May Basood2, Avraham Frisch3, Chiya Leibovitch6, Maya Koren-Michowitz1,7.   

Abstract

Combinations of the BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, with either hypomethylating agents (HMA) or low dose cytarabine (LDAC), have shown promising results in clinical trials of AML patients unfit for intensive therapy. We report on the efficacy and safety of venetoclax combinations in AML patients treated outside of clinical trials. Complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) were achieved in 61% of patients, with similar CR+CRi rates in with secondary AML, and in patients who were previously treated with HMA (61% and 43%, respectively). Relapse occurred in 25% of patients, with a median event-free survival (EFS) of 11.7 months (95% CI, 10.09-13.35) in responding patients. At a median follow up of 8.7 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.8 months (95% CI 6.42-13.3) in the entire cohort. In multivariate analysis adverse karyotype was the only negative predictor of CR/CRi (p = .03), while both ECOG performance status (PS) and adverse karyotype were significantly associated with shorter OS (p = .023 and .038, respectively). Median OS was higher in patients achieving CR/CRi and in patients proceeding to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Treatment was well tolerated, with side effects similar to those described in the randomized clinical trials. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurred in 12% of patients. Our data support the efficacy and safety of venetoclax combinations in newly diagnosed AML patients not eligible for intensive therapy. According to our data, secondary AML patients could benefit from venetoclax combinations similarly to de-novo AML patients, and allo-SCT could be offered to selected patients achieving CR/CRi.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33836555     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  2 in total

1.  Real-world effectiveness of CPX-351 vs venetoclax and azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Andrew H Matthews; Alexander E Perl; Selina M Luger; Alison W Loren; Saar I Gill; David L Porter; Daria V Babushok; Ivan P Maillard; Martin P Carroll; Noelle V Frey; Elizabeth O Hexner; Mary Ellen Martin; Shannon R McCurdy; Edward A Stadtmauer; Vikram R Paralkar; Ximena Jordan Bruno; Wei-Ting Hwang; David Margolis; Keith W Pratz
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Maximilian Fleischmann; Sebastian Scholl; Jochen J Frietsch; Inken Hilgendorf; Karin Schrenk; Jakob Hammersen; Florian Prims; Christian Thiede; Andreas Hochhaus; Ulf Schnetzke
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.322

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.