Literature DB >> 33836153

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced mesothelioma in the open-label, single-arm, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study.

Timothy A Yap1, Kazuhiko Nakagawa2, Nobukazu Fujimoto3, Kozo Kuribayashi4, Tormod Kyrre Guren5, Luana Calabrò6, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer7, Bo Gao8, Steven Kao9, Ignacio Matos10, David Planchard11, Arkendu Chatterjee12, Fan Jin12, Kevin Norwood12, Hedy L Kindler13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has few treatment options. Pembrolizumab showed preliminary clinical benefit in programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive MPM. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated MPM irrespective of PD-L1 status in the KEYNOTE-158 study.
METHODS: The ongoing open-label, multicohort, single-arm, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study enrolled eligible adults (≥18 years) with MPM who had progression on or intolerance to standard therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and biomarker-evaluable tumour samples. Individuals were enrolled from 35 academic facilities and community-based institutions across 14 countries in Australia, North America, Europe, and Asia. Participants received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, based on radiological imaging every 9 weeks for the first year of the study and every 12 weeks thereafter and assessed by independent central review. Efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02628067.
FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled in the MPM cohort between Feb 9, 2016, and Aug 16, 2016. As of June 27, 2019, 118 patients had been enrolled and received at least one dose of pembrolizumab. Ten (8% [95% CI 4-15]) patients had an objective response. Median duration of objective response was 14·3 months (range 4·0 to 33·9+), and 60% of objective responses were ongoing at 12 months. Objective responses were observed in six (8%) of 77 patients with PD-L1-positive MPM (median response duration 17·7 months [range 5·8 to 33·9+]) and four (13%) of 31 patients with PD-L1-negative MPM (10·2 months [4·0-16·6]). Median overall survival was 10·0 months (95% CI 7·6-13·4) and median progression-free survival was 2·1 months (2·1-3·9). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 82 (69%) of 118 patients and serious adverse events that were considered to be treatment-related occurred in 14 (12%) of 118 patients. 19 (16%) patients had grade 3-4 treatment-related events, and most common of these were colitis (three patients), hyponatraemia (three), and pneumonitis (two). One patient died from treatment-related apnoea. By the end of the trial, 113 (96%) patients had discontinued pembrolizumab and progressive disease was the most common reason for discontinuation.
INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab showed durable antitumour activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced MPM, regardless of PD-L1 status. Our data support the programmed death 1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 pathway as a potential therapeutic target in some patients with previously treated mesothelioma but biomarkers that can effectively identify such patients are yet to be elucidated. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33836153     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30515-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  11 in total

Review 1.  Novel approaches for the treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: A focus on immunotherapy and target therapy (Review).

Authors:  Erika Rijavec; Federica Biello; Giulia Barletta; Chiara Dellepiane; Carlo Genova
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 2.  Immunotherapy approaches for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Dean A Fennell; Sean Dulloo; James Harber
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 65.011

3.  Genomic landscape of pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma tumours.

Authors:  Stefanie Hiltbrunner; Zoe Fleischmann; Ethan S Sokol; Martin Zoche; Emanuela Felley-Bosco; Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 4.  Current status and progress in immunotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Boyang Sun; Yiting Dong; Jiachen Xu; Zhijie Wang
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 5.  Comparative Analysis of Predictive Biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Cancers: Developments and Challenges.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Jacqueline F Wang; Yucai Wang; Baorui Liu; Julian R Molina
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Novel and Future Treatment Options in Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Danijela Štrbac; Vita Dolžan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  An Update on Emerging Therapeutic Options for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Alexander Davis; Helen Ke; Steven Kao; Nick Pavlakis
Journal:  Lung Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  G6PD functions as a metabolic checkpoint to regulate granzyme B expression in tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Chunwan Lu; Dafeng Yang; John D Klement; Yolonda L Colson; Nicholas H Oberlies; Cedric J Pearce; Aaron H Colby; Mark W Grinstaff; Han-Fei Ding; Huidong Shi; Kebin Liu
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 9.  Immunotherapy, the promise for present and future of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treatment.

Authors:  Valérie Gounant; Solenn Brosseau; Gérard Zalcman
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 8.168

10.  Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A French, Multicenter, Retrospective Real-World Study.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Assié; Florian Crépin; Emmanuel Grolleau; Anthony Canellas; Margaux Geier; Aude Grébert-Manuardi; Nabila Akkache; Aldo Renault; Pierre-Alexandre Hauss; Marielle Sabatini; Valentine Bonnefoy; Alexis Cortot; Marie Wislez; Clément Gauvain; Christos Chouaïd; Arnaud Scherpereel; Isabelle Monnet
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.