Veronique Demers-Mathieu1, Ciera DaPra1, Elena Medo1. 1. Department of Neonatal Immunology and Microbiology, Medolac Laboratories, A Public Benefit Corporation, Boulder City, Nevada, USA.
Abstract
Background: Human milk from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-recovered women may be useful as oral antibody therapy to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and provide long-term immunity to neonates and young children. As convalescent plasma is already used as antibody therapy, this study aimed to compare the binding capacity of antibodies specific to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 between human milk and serum from COVID-19-recovered women. Materials and Methods: The areas under the curve (AUCs) for IgA, IgM, and IgG specific to the SARS-CoV-2 RBD in human milk and serum samples were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Milk samples were collected from 12 COVID-19-recovered women, while serum samples were from 10 COVID-19-recovered women. The antibody concentrations were also determined. Results: Our study reveals that SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibody titers differed between human milk and serum samples from COVID-19-recovered women. When the AUCs were not divided by the antibody concentration, SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA, IgM, and IgG levels were higher in the serum sample group than the human milk group (p < 0.001). However, the titers of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgM (AUC/μg of IgM) and IgG (AUC/μg of IgG) were higher in human milk samples than serum samples (p < 0.05). The titer of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA (AUC/mg of IgA) was higher in the serum sample group than the human milk group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Human milk antibodies specific to the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 must be purified to obtain comparable binding capacity observed with SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific serum antibodies.
Background: Human milk from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-recovered women may be useful as oral antibody therapy to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and provide long-term immunity to neonates and young children. As convalescent plasma is already used as antibody therapy, this study aimed to compare the binding capacity of antibodies specific to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 between human milk and serum from COVID-19-recovered women. Materials and Methods: The areas under the curve (AUCs) for IgA, IgM, and IgG specific to the SARS-CoV-2 RBD in human milk and serum samples were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Milk samples were collected from 12 COVID-19-recovered women, while serum samples were from 10 COVID-19-recovered women. The antibody concentrations were also determined. Results: Our study reveals that SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibody titers differed between human milk and serum samples from COVID-19-recovered women. When the AUCs were not divided by the antibody concentration, SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA, IgM, and IgG levels were higher in the serum sample group than the human milk group (p < 0.001). However, the titers of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgM (AUC/μg of IgM) and IgG (AUC/μg of IgG) were higher in human milk samples than serum samples (p < 0.05). The titer of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific IgA (AUC/mg of IgA) was higher in the serum sample group than the human milk group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Human milk antibodies specific to the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 must be purified to obtain comparable binding capacity observed with SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific serum antibodies.
Authors: L Ryan; Frans B Plötz; Agnes van den Hoogen; Jos M Latour; Marina Degtyareva; Maya Keuning; Claus Klingenberg; Irwin K M Reiss; Eric Giannoni; Charles Roehr; Christopher Gale; Eleanor J Molloy Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Flaminia Olearo; Laura-Sophie Radmanesh; Nadine Felber; Ronald von Possel; Petra Emmerich; Neele Pekarek; Susanne Pfefferle; Dominik Nörz; Gudula Hansen; Anke Diemert; Martin Aepfelbacher; Kurt Hecher; Marc Lütgehetmann; Petra Clara Arck; Ann-Christin Tallarek Journal: J Reprod Immunol Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 3.993
Authors: Vignesh Narayanaswamy; Brian T Pentecost; Janice C Telfer; Amy S Burnside; Sallie S Schneider; Dominique Alfandari; Ryan L Baker; Aman Saiju; Sam Nodiff; Kathleen F Arcaro Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 8.786