| Literature DB >> 33834338 |
Thi Phuong Mai Nguyen1,2, Thi Hieu Bui3, Manh Khai Nguyen4, Thi Hue Nguyen5, Van Tu Vu6, Hai Long Pham6.
Abstract
Covid-19 lockdowns have improved the ambient air quality across the world via reduced air pollutant levels. This article aims to investigate the effect of the partial lockdown on the main ambient air pollutants and their elemental concentrations bound to PM2.5 in Hanoi. In addition to the PM2.5 samples collected at three urban sites in Hanoi, the daily PM2.5, NO2, O3, and SO2 levels were collected from the automatic ambient air quality monitoring station at Nguyen Van Cu street to analyze the pollution level before (March 10th-March 31st) and during the partial lockdown (April 1st-April 22nd) with "current" data obtained in 2020 and "historical" data obtained in 2014, 2016, and 2017. The results showed that NO2, PM2.5, O3, and SO2 concentrations obtained from the automatic ambient air quality monitoring station were reduced by 75.8, 55.9, 21.4, and 60.7%, respectively, compared with historical data. Besides, the concentration of PM2.5 at sampling sites declined by 41.8% during the partial lockdown. Furthermore, there was a drastic negative relationship between the boundary layer height (BLH) and the daily mean PM2.5 in Hanoi. The concentrations of Cd, Se, As, Sr, Ba, Cu, Mn, Pb, K, Zn, Ca, Al, and Mg during the partial lockdown were lower than those before the partial lockdown. The results of enrichment factor (EF) values and principal component analysis (PCA) concluded that trace elements in PM2.5 before the partial lockdown were more affected by industrial activities than those during the partial lockdown.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Hanoi; Metals; Partial quarantine; SARS-CoV-2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33834338 PMCID: PMC8032319 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13792-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 5.190
Fig. 1Location of sampling sites (S1, S2, S3) and the automatic ambient air monitoring station (NVC)
Mean concentration of PM2.5, SO2, NO2, O3, and average meteorological parameters recorded in Hanoi before the partial lockdown (March 10–31) and during the partial lockdown (April 1–22)
| Historical mean during the partial lockdown | Prior to the partial lockdown | During the partial lockdown | Difference [variation in %] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | ||||
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 98.4 | 52.9 | 43.4 | –55.0 [–55.9] | –9.5 [–18.0] |
| NO2 | 21.6 | 11.6 | 5.2 | –16.3[–75.8] | –6.4 [–55.1] |
| SO2 | 13.0 | 4.5 | 5.1 | –7.9[– 60.7] | 0.6 [13.5] |
| O3 | 21.8 | 12.2 | 17.1 | –4.7 [–21.4] | 4.9 [40.7] |
| Temperature (oC) | 25.4 | 23.3 | 22.4 | –3 [–11.8] | –0.8 [–3.7] |
| Precipitation (mm/day) | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.3 | –0.1 [–4.2] | 0.2 [8.7] |
| Relative humidity (%) | 83.9 | 84.8 | 83.8 | – 0.1[–0.1] | –1[1.2] |
| Surface solar radiation (MJ/m2) | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | –0.1[–20] | 0.1 [20] |
| BLH | 476.9 | 414.0 | 418.0 | –58.9 [–12.4] | 4.0 [0.2] |
A: Differences of mean concentration during the partial lockdown period in 2020 vs in historical years
B: Differences of mean concentration during the partial lockdown vs before the partial lockdown in 2020
Fig. 2Mass concentration ratio of [NO2]/[SO2] before and during the partial lockdown in 2020 and in historical years
Average concentrations (average ± standard deviation) of metals in PM2.5 before the partial lockdown and during the partial lockdown in Hanoi (unit: ng/m3; except for the units of PM2.5 with *μg/m3)
| Before the partial lockdown | During the partial lockdown | Difference [variation in %] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL ( | HVT ( | Average | CN ( | ||
| PM2.5* | 90.7 ± 33.2 | 73.6 ± 19.7 | 82.17 ± 26.45 | 47.9 ± 8.0 | – 34.3 [41.7] |
| Cd | 0.79 ± 0.37 | 0.86 ± 0.41 | 0.83 ± 0.37 | 0.48 ± 0.28 | – 0.35 [42.5] |
| As | 2.13 ± 0.65 | 2.44 ± 0.95 | 2.29 ±0.77 | 1.67 ± 0.91 | – 0.62 [27.2] |
| Cr | 3.16 ± 1.12 | 2.96 ± 0.96 | 3.07 ± 0.97 | 4.23 ± 6.34 | + 1.16 [37.9] |
| Ca | 930.49 ± 239.23 | 1237.05 ± 136.67 | 1083.77 ± 243.69 | 757.94 ± 216.64 | – 325.83[30.1] |
| Mn | 11.66 ± 63.73 | 17.26 ± 9.97 | 14.46 ± 7.58 | 11.08 ± 5.31 | – 3.38 [23.4] |
| Al | 91.26 ± 19.08 | 169.11 ± 22.35 | 130.19 ± 45.84 | 95.67 ± 29.97 | – 34.52 [26.5] |
| Fe | 467.79 ± 75.16 | 1835.90 ± 1235.18 | 1151.85 ± 1091.36 | 1011.72 ± 1260.26 | –140.13 [12.2] |
| Mg | 91.45 ± 23.55 | 144.38 ± 26.82 | 117.92 ± 36.69 | 94.65 ± 24.52 | – 23.27 [19.7] |
| Ba | 5.26 ± 1.98 | 6.01 ± 1.85 | 5.64 ± 1.82 | 3.8 ± 1.21 | – 1.81 [32.1] |
| Co | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.09 | 0.19 ± 0.07 | 0.35 ± 0.55 | + 0.16 [82.6] |
| Cu | 6.05 ± 1.75 | 5.68 ± 1.81 | 5.87 ± 1.66 | 3.21 ± 1.05 | – 2.66 [45.3] |
| Pb | 19.72 ± 9.72 | 36.30 ± 16.49 | 28.01 ± 15.35 | 13.29 ± 5.21 | –14.73 [52.6] |
| Ti | 6.56 ± 2.44 | 5.98 ± 1.28 | 6.27 ± 1.83 | 4.75 ± 0.86 | – 1.52 [24.2] |
| V | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.64 ± 0.09 | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.66 ± 0.34 | + 0.05 [7.9] |
| Zn | 121.44 ± 60.03 | 472.24 ± 227.26 | 296.84 ± 242.57 | 143.25 ± 115.43 | – 153.59 [51.7] |
| Ni | 1.13 ± 0.44 | 1.64 ± 0.67 | 1.38 ± 0.59 | 2.26 ± 0.91 | + 1.24 [89.7] |
| Sr | 3.15 ± 0.61 | 4.54± 1.09 | 3.85 ± 1.10 | 2.82 ± 0.75 | – 1.03 [26.8] |
| K | 361.42 ± 134.62 | 287.50 ± 79.71 | 324.46 ± 109.78 | 179.37 ± 35.22 | –145.09 [44.7] |
| Na | 78.31 ± 38.39 | 62.43 ± 18.80 | 70.37 ± 29.24 | 80.76 ± 51.91 | +10.39 [14.8] |
| Mo | 0.31 ± 0.11 | 0.28± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.44 ± 0.53 | + 0.14 [48.7] |
Fig. 3Scatter plot between BLH and PM2.5 level in Hanoi (a) PM2.5 from field work and (b) PM2.5 from the automatic air quality monitoring station
Fig. 4Element concentrations in PM2.5 before and during the partial lockdown in Hanoi
Fig. 5Results of PCA represented by the score and loading plots of samples before the partial lockdown (open squares) and during the partial lockdown (close circles). Open triangle represented trace elements in PM2.5 samples