Literature DB >> 33833386

Autologous CD33-CAR-T cells for treatment of relapsed/refractory acute myelogenous leukemia.

Francesco Paolo Tambaro1,2, Harjeet Singh1, Emily Jones3, Michael Rytting1, Kris M Mahadeo1, Philip Thompson3, Naval Daver3, Courtney DiNardo3, Tapan Kadia3, Guillermo Garcia-Manero3, Tim Chan4, Rutul R Shah4, William G Wierda5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33833386      PMCID: PMC8550958          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01232-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   12.883


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor:

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is a potentially curable disease; 70% of newly diagnosed patients achieve complete remission with first-line therapy, but prognosis worsens for relapsed disease in both pediatric and adult patients. A recent study examined long-term overall survival (OS) in relapsed patients with AML enrolled to nine successive ECOG-ACRIN trials for newly diagnosed AML between 1984 and 2008. Importantly, a median OS of 6 months from relapse and 10% 5-year OS were reported [1]. Recently, encouraging results were reported for targeted agents against molecular markers associated to the poor prognosis in relapsed disease given as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy, including FLT3- [2], IDH1- [3] and IDH2-inhibitors [4]. Remarkable results were achieved with CAR-modified T cells targeting CD19 in relapsed/refractory patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [5] and pediatric B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [6] (50–90% CR), which inspired development of CAR-T cellular therapy for other indications, such as AML. Identifying a myeloid target for CAR-T cellular therapy has proven challenging, since surface antigens are shared by malignant myelogenous cells and normal hematopoietic stem cells, potentially resulting in prolonged myelotoxicity when tested in clinical trials. CD33, a member of the sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin family, is expressed on subpopulations of leukemia cells, including leukemic stem cells, in almost 90% of AML cases as well as on some normal myeloid precursors [7]. We initiated a single-center, single-arm, Phase I clinical trial (NCT03126864) to investigate the feasibility and safety of autologous T cells, modified to express a CD33-targeted CAR with 4-1BB and CD3ζ endo-domains and co-expressed with truncated human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1t) [8], in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The goals of this Phase I clinical trial were to assess the feasibility and safety of adoptive transfer of the autologous CD33-CAR-T cells identify the recommended Phase II dose. Details of the clinical trial, including product release criteria (Table S1), can be found in the Supplementary Material. Ten adults with relapsed/refractory AML were enrolled; 7 were male; median age was 30 (range 18–73) years (Table 1). Patients had received a median of 5 (range 3–8) prior treatment regimens; 3 underwent prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. The median percent bone marrow blasts at screening, WBC, the percent peripheral blood blasts and the lymphocyte count at apheresis were 55% (10–88), 1.6/µl (0.5–7.6), 26% (6–80), and 0.63/µl (0.01–1.5), respectively. Apheresis was collected for 8 patients; 4 had CD33-CAR-T cells produced which met release pre-specified release criteria for infusion; 4 had CD33-CAR-T cell product that failed to meet at least one pre-specified release criteria; and 2 patients had rapidly progressive AML and could not undergo apheresis (Table 2). Three patients received CD33-CAR-T cells at the first dose level (0.3 × 106 CD33-CAR-T/kg) and 1 patient died before receiving their cells. The time from apheresis to CD33-CAR-T cell infusion is shown (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics and treatment.

Patient number0102030406(05)07*08091011
SexMMMMMMMFFF
Age36733818181852245619
Number Prior therapies6755578535
% BM Blasts at screening10185060478627666085
Number WBC/μl at apheresis0.85.41.70.90.57.65.5nana1.5
Number lymphocytes/mL at apheresis (%)0.16 (20)1.5 (28)0.48 (28)0.6 (67)0.01 (2)0.76 (10)0.66 (12)nana0.92 (61)
% PB Blasts at apheresis621632080748nana31
Apheresisyyyyyyynny
% T cells in apheresis product14.633.523.245.746.447.1nana64.6
% CD33+ blasts in apheresis product54.724.460.945.434.294.6NDnana22.5
CD33-CAR-T cells product released (y/n)nyyn#ynnnanay
CD33-CAR-T cell infusion (y/n)nnynynnnanay
Apheresis to CD33-CAR-T infusion (days)nana94na36nananana49
Dose (×106/kg)nana0.3na0.3nananana0.3

y, yes; n, no; na, not applicable; ND, not determined; #, number.

* Pts 5 and 7 were same patient.

# For Pt 4, sufficient CD33-CAR-T cells were manufactured but %CD3 + -CAR + was below release specification and product lot was successfully released per agreement with the FDA.

Table 2

Patient outcomes*.

Patient number030611
Day of protocolPre-LD0371430Pre-LD0371430Pre-LD0371430
WBC (/μl)9.41.40.30.60.4NT0.60.60.50.40.24.21.00000.10.4
% lymphocytes2228NR5465NT57405165NR1579NRNRNRNR42
% CD33-CAR-T (blood flow HER1t)NA0.0500.371.8NTNA0.070.020.031.68NTNA00.030.090.59NT
CD33-CAR-T by ddPCR (HER1t copies/μg blood DNA)NA00650NTNA0089613032NTNA005843701NT
% Blood blasts7864NR4435NT35212920NR7812NRNRNRNR38
CRS (Grade)3 (D7)02 (D6)
ICANS (Grade)2 (D9)00
AE – CD33-CAR-T-related (Grade)

TLS – AKI (G3)

Mucositis (G2)

Tachycardia (G1)

Intermittent Orthostatic Hypotension (G2)

↑ Bilirubin (G2)

↑ ALT (G3)

↑ AST (G3)

None
AE – CD33-CAR-T-unrelated (Grade)Respiratory Distress (G4)None

Febrile Neutropenia (G3)

Sepsis (G4)

Septic Shock (G4)

Cytokines: Baseline — Peak (Day)
 IL6 (0–5 pg/mL)69 28025 (D7)0 No change10 330 (D10)
 IFNγ (0–5 pg/mL)2 No change0 No change32 166 (D6)
 TNFα (0–22 pg/mL)49 142 (D7)0 No change40 886 (D6)
Tocilizumab/SteroidsY/YNoneY/N
Day from CAR-T taken off studyD20D29D31
Reason taken off studyDisease ProgressionDisease ProgressionDisease Progression
StatusDeceasedDeceasedDeceased

* number, AE adverse event, AKI acute kidney injury, CD33-CAR-T CD33-directed chimeric antigen receptor-T cell, CRS cytokine release syndrome, D day, G grade, ICANS immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, N no, NA not applicable, NR not reported, NT not tested, Pre-LD pre-lymphodepletion, TLS tumor lysis syndrome, Y yes.

Patient characteristics and treatment. y, yes; n, no; na, not applicable; ND, not determined; #, number. * Pts 5 and 7 were same patient. # For Pt 4, sufficient CD33-CAR-T cells were manufactured but %CD3 + -CAR + was below release specification and product lot was successfully released per agreement with the FDA. Patient outcomes*. TLS – AKI (G3) Mucositis (G2) Tachycardia (G1) Intermittent Orthostatic Hypotension (G2) ↑ Bilirubin (G2) ↑ ALT (G3) ↑ AST (G3) Febrile Neutropenia (G3) Sepsis (G4) Septic Shock (G4) * number, AE adverse event, AKI acute kidney injury, CD33-CAR-T CD33-directed chimeric antigen receptor-T cell, CRS cytokine release syndrome, D day, G grade, ICANS immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, N no, NA not applicable, NR not reported, NT not tested, Pre-LD pre-lymphodepletion, TLS tumor lysis syndrome, Y yes. Table 2 summarizes blood cell and cytokine levels pre- and blood cell and cytokine levels, toxicities and outcomes following infusion of CD33-CAR-T cells for all 3 treated patients. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed (Table 2) at dose level 1 during the 28-day DLT assessment period. Two patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 1 patient developed immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Adverse events possibly related to CD33-CAR-T cells included a grade 3 tumor lysis syndrome-acute kidney injury, grade 2 mucositis, grade 1 tachycardia for 1 patient; and a second patient experienced grade 2 intermittent orthostatic hypotension, grade 2 increased bilirubin and grade 3 increased ALT and AST. One patient experienced no toxicity. Adverse Events unrelated to the treatment were grade 3 respiratory distress syndrome in one patient and grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 4 sepsis and septic shock in another patient. All three patients who received CD33-CAR-T cells have died, due to disease progression. All 3 patients had leukopenia on the day of CD33-CAR-T cell infusion; 2 had circulating blasts. Two methods were used to detect circulating CAR-T cells: flow cytometry with fluorescently labeled cetuximab and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) for HER1t. CD33-CAR-T cells were detected by both methods. Patient 03 and 11 had CRS and had associated increase in blood IL-6 level. Despite the activity seen, none of the patients met criteria for response to treatment. There was in vivo evidence of CD33-CAR-T cells at this lowest dose level, which was associated with increase in inflammatory cytokine levels (IL6, IFNγ, TNFα) concurrent with ICANS and CRS, and for only those who manifested these symptoms (Table 2). No pediatric patients were enrolled due to closure of the trial upon clearing the first dose level with no DLT. Due to challenges posed by the aggressive nature of relapsed/refractory AML and need for expeditious autologous product generation, logistic and enrollment challenges, the trial was closed to patient entry after patient 11 was enrolled and treated. The sponsors have transitioned to a platform that facilitates more rapid production and in vivo expansion with a product referred to as PRGN-3006 (NCT03927261) [9, 10]. We could detect CD33-CAR-T cells in blood samples from patients following infusion with associated symptoms and increased cytokine levels. Despite this biologic activity, we did not see anti-leukemia responses, although patients received only one dose of CD33-CAR-T cells, and this was the lowest dose level. A single case report of a patient with relapsed AML treated with CD33-CAR-T cells suggested therapeutic activity with associated symptoms and increase in inflammatory cytokine levels (NCT01864902) [11]. No further follow up has been provided for this trial. Our trial illustrated challenges associated with CAR-T therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory AML which relate to manufacturing using viral vectors, rapid disease progression and risk for infection, and coordination of administration of this therapeutic modality. Most patients with relapsed/refractory AML have lymphopenia and many have increased number of circulating blood blasts, which complicate and increase difficulty of producing autologous CAR-T cells. In this clinical trial, there were 10 patients enrolled and the cell product meeting all prespecified release criteria was successfully made for 4 of these patients. Two enrolled patients were unable to undergo apheresis. Challenges included rapid disease progression and high blood blast count, lymphopenia and difficulty with acquiring adequate number of starting T cells in the apheresis step, difficulty of manufacturing using lentiviral vector, and disease progression or infection during lengthy production time, all of which contributed to inability to receiving product for some patients enrolled in this trial. Therefore, for patients with AML, there is need to develop a strategy which eliminates or markedly shortens manufacturing time to address the shortcomings of lentiviral transduction. Relapsed/refractory AML is typically an aggressive disease with a rapid, unrelenting tempo of progression. Due to depletion of myeloid cells by the disease and treatments, patients are severely immunodeficient and at very high risk for infection. Considering the logistics and time of 2–4 weeks required for production and release with lentiviral and retroviral transduction, there is a significant time-at-risk for patients with respect to both progressive AML and infection. Events during this period represent a significant risk to receiving lymphodepletion and CAR-T cell product. “Bridging” chemotherapy has been used, but has associated toxicity and is usually myelosuppressive and immunosuppressive. An ideal CAR-T cell target should to be easily accessible, expressed on the surface of all cancer cells and not be shared by viable tissues or normal hematopoietic cells, in order to reduce the eventual toxicity and side effects. AML antigen targets are usually also expressed on normal hematopoietic cells, which may result in undesired prolonged myelosuppression. Clinical trials are ongoing to test CAR-T cells targeting antigens other than CD33 on myeloid blasts including: CD123 (NCT03766126, NCT03114670, NCT03190278, NCT04230265, NCT03631576), IL1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP) (NCT04169022), CLL-1 (NCT04219163), CD38 (NCT04351022), and FLT-3 (NCT03904069). Despite expression on some normal myeloid progenitors, CD33 remains a reasonable and attractive therapeutic target. We observed in vivo CD33-CAR-T cells and activity and symptoms consistent with this observation. There are ongoing trials with CD33-CAR-T cell strategies (NCT03971799, NCT03927261). In conclusion, autologous CD33-CAR-T cell production via lentiviral transduction was challenging, and was feasible only in patients with higher lymphocyte count and lower blood blasts. No DLTs were noted at the first dose level and in vivo CD33-CAR-T cells were detected. CRS and ICANS occurred, and were manageable for this lowest dose cohort. Higher T cell count at apheresis and rapid manufacturing strategies that reduce time from apheresis to treatment will be essential in CAR-T treatments for these challenging patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Supplemental Material Author Statement
  12 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Susana Olmedillas-López; Rocío Olivera-Salazar; Mariano García-Arranz; Damián García-Olmo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 2.  High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Pediatric Prospective.

Authors:  Fabiana Cacace; Rossella Iula; Danilo De Novellis; Valeria Caprioli; Maria Rosaria D'Amico; Giuseppina De Simone; Rosanna Cuccurullo; William G Wierda; Kris Michael Mahadeo; Giuseppe Menna; Francesco Paolo Tambaro
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Systematic preclinical evaluation of CD33-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia defines optimized construct design.

Authors:  Sarah K Tasian; Terry J Fry; Haiying Qin; Lila Yang; John A Chukinas; Nirali Shah; Samiksha Tarun; Marie Pouzolles; Christopher D Chien; Lisa M Niswander; Anthony R Welch; Naomi Taylor
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 12.469

Review 4.  Cellular and Molecular Biomarkers Predictive of Response to Immunotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Kyle Wiatrowski; Tae Hee Kim; Amanda Przespolewski
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Transgenic Expression of IL15 Retains CD123-Redirected T Cells in a Less Differentiated State Resulting in Improved Anti-AML Activity in Autologous AML PDX Models.

Authors:  Hong Mu-Mosley; Lauren Ostermann; Muharrem Muftuoglu; Abishek Vaidya; Challice L Bonifant; Mireya Paulina Velasquez; Stephen Gottschalk; Michael Andreeff
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 6.  Prevention and Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapse after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Salvatore Leotta; Annalisa Condorelli; Roberta Sciortino; Giulio Antonio Milone; Claudia Bellofiore; Bruno Garibaldi; Giovanni Schininà; Andrea Spadaro; Alessandra Cupri; Giuseppe Milone
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Strategies to Circumvent the Side-Effects of Immunotherapy Using Allogeneic CAR-T Cells and Boost Its Efficacy: Results of Recent Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Sergei Smirnov; Alexey Petukhov; Ksenia Levchuk; Sergey Kulemzin; Alena Staliarova; Kirill Lepik; Oleg Shuvalov; Andrey Zaritskey; Alexandra Daks; Olga Fedorova
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Unifying heterogeneous expression data to predict targets for CAR-T cell therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Schreiner; Mireya Paulina Velasquez; Stephen Gottschalk; Jinghui Zhang; Yiping Fan
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 9.  Challenges and Advances in Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Jennifer Marvin-Peek; Bipin N Savani; Oluwole O Olalekan; Bhagirathbhai Dholaria
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Development of CAR T Cell Therapy in Children-A Comprehensive Overview.

Authors:  Michael Boettcher; Alexander Joechner; Ziduo Li; Sile Fiona Yang; Patrick Schlegel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.