Literature DB >> 3383317

Prospective assessment of a protocol for selective ordering of preoperative chest x-rays.

Y Charpak1, C Blery, C Chastang, M Szatan, B Fourgeaux.   

Abstract

Routine preoperative chest x-rays are still widely employed worldwide, although results of many studies do not support their broad utilization. A protocol for selective ordering of preoperative chest x-rays, according to the patient's clinical status, medical history and scheduled surgery, was developed and implemented in a teaching hospital in Paris. The utilization of the protocol during a one-year period was evaluated. Eleven hundred and one chest x-rays were ordered in 3866 patients (28 per cent). Five hundred and sixty-eight x-rays (52 per cent) were abnormal. One hundred and sixty-six (15 per cent) were considered useful by the anaesthetists, who took into account the entire hospital course, although only 51 (5 per cent) had an impact on the surgical plan or anaesthetic management. Among the 2765 patients who did not have a preoperative chest x-ray, two patients could have benefited from the chest x-ray, in the view of anaesthetists. Chart review for these two patients and for patients who had perioperative complications in the absence of a preoperative chest x-ray revealed that no complications could be linked to the lack of preoperative chest x-ray ordering. This study shows that the abandonment of routine ordering of preoperative chest x-rays does not produce adverse effects on patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3383317     DOI: 10.1007/BF03010620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  9 in total

1.  Sounding board The "overutilization" of x-rays.

Authors:  H L Abrams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Possible impact of audit on chest X-ray requests from surgical wards.

Authors:  C J Roberts; F G Fowkes; W P Ennis; M Mitchell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-08-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Preoperative chest radiology. National study by the Royal College of Radiologists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  [Routine x-ray examination of the thorax prior to surgical intervention under general anesthesia].

Authors:  H S Thomsen; J Gottlieb; J K Madsen; S G Rasmussen; K B Jensen; J J Christensen; V Christensen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1978-04-03

5.  [Preoperative x-ray of the thorax. Indications and consequences].

Authors:  A Haubek; G Cold
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1978-04-03

6.  Efficacy of chest radiography in a respiratory intensive care unit. A prospective study.

Authors:  W B Bekemeyer; R O Crapo; S Calhoon; C Y Cannon; P D Clayton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Evaluation of a protocol for selective ordering of preoperative tests.

Authors:  C Blery; Y Charpak; M Szatan; B Darne; B Fourgeaux; C Chastang; J H Gaudy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-01-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Usefulness of screening chest roentgenograms in preoperative patients.

Authors:  L Rucker; E B Frye; M A Staten
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The utility of routine chest radiographs.

Authors:  T G Tape; A I Mushlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Screening prior to surgery and interventions].

Authors:  M Hübler; A Hübler
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Preoperative patient evaluation.

Authors:  M Roizen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  The compelling rationale for less preoperative testing.

Authors:  M F Roizen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Value of routine preoperative chest x-rays: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Archer; A R Levy; M McGregor
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Preoperative patient assessment: a review of the literature and recommendations.

Authors:  N A Barnard; R W Williams; E M Spencer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Preoperative evaluation and a risk assessment in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab; Michael Wayne; Michael Cioroiu; Lee M Zank; Christopher Mills
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.549

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.