Association between Fecal Calprotectin and Mucosal Healing in Pediatric Patients with Crohn's Disease Who Have Achieved Sustained Clinical Remission with Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: : Although mucosal healing (MH) is acknowledged as the treatment target in the treat-to-target era, there are limitations on repeated endoscopic examinations, especially in pediatric patients. We aimed to investigate whether fecal calprotectin (FC) could serve as a surrogate marker for the assessment of MH in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who have achieved sustained clinical remission (CR) while treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study included pediatric CD patients who had sustained a CR for at least 6 months with anti-TNF agents and who simultaneously underwent ileocolonoscopy and FC tests during follow-up. MH was defined as the absence of any ulcer on ileocolonoscopy.
RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included in this study. MH was observed in 87 patients (66.7%). The FC level was significantly lower in patients with MH than in those without MH (median 49.0 mg/kg vs 599.0 mg/kg; p<0.001). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, FC was the only factor associated with MH (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.73; p<0.001). According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff value for FC for the association with MH was <140 mg/kg (area under the curve 0.890, 95% CI 0.829 to 0.951, sensitivity 78.2%, specificity 88.6%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: FC was associated with MH in pediatric patients with CD who had achieved a sustained CR for at least 6 months with anti-TNF agents. In these patients, FC can be used to stratify patients and guide decisions regarding ileocolonoscopy in the treat-to-target era.

INTRODUCTION

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic, disabling inflammatory disease that affects the gastrointestinal tract.1 Untreated CD leads to critical complications including fibrostenosis and penetration of the bowel, which require surgery.2,3 Pediatric-onset CD presents with a more severe phenotype and is more aggressive than adult-onset disease, requiring earlier and more intensive treatment with biologics.4-6 Meanwhile, mucosal healing (MH), which is evaluated by ileocolonoscopy, is the acknowledged therapeutic goal of CD in the treat-to-target era, which is recommended 6 to 9 months after treatment initiation.7,8 However, its feasibility in real-life practice is limited, especially in children and adolescents.

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a sensitive surrogate marker in detecting endoscopic activity in CD. Studies have shown that FC level cutoffs of 70–250 mg/kg in adults are capable of detecting endoscopic remission with a sensitivity of 70% to 94% and a specificity of 62% to 92%.9-11 There are limited studies in the pediatric population. However, a study has shown that an FC level of <200 mg/kg is associated with endoscopic remission and that the positive likelihood ratio increases when the cutoff is increased to 500 mg/kg.12 Another study reported that the most accurate cutoff of FC that is associated with MH was <300 mg/kg, and for a composite of MH and transmural healing, a cutoff of <100 mg/kg is most accurate.13

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are potent drugs that are capable of inducing and maintaining not only clinical remission (CR) but also MH in CD.14 Therefore, in real-life clinical practice, some patients not only respond well to anti-TNF treatment but also sustain CR.5 When faced with this clinical scenario of pediatric patients with CD in well-sustained CR with anti-TNF agents, pediatric gastroenterologists question the necessity of frequent and repetitive endoscopic follow-up evaluation considering the limitation of ileocolonoscopic examination in children and the likeliness of a substantial portion of these patients will have MH. However, there is a lack of evidence whether noninvasive markers such as FC are capable of distinguishing those with and without MH in pediatric patients with CD in sustained CR with anti-TNF agents.

Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether FC could serve as a surrogate marker for assessing MH in pediatric patients with CD in sustained CR for at least 6 months while on treatment with anti-TNF agents, and to seek the FC cutoff levels associated with MH in this specific group of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study design and participants

This study was approved by the institutional review board of all participating centers (Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital IRB number: 2017-10-002) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of this study.

This study was conducted between May 2016 and April 2017 at the department of pediatrics of five tertiary medical centers in the Republic of Korea; Kyungpook National University Children’s Hospital, Yonsei University Children’s Hospital, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon, and Samsung Medical Center.

The study included pediatric patients with CD who had been diagnosed before the age of 19 years and had sustained CR for at least 6 months with an anti-TNF agent, and who had simultaneously undergone ileocolonoscopy and FC test, as well as other laboratory tests. CD was diagnosed in accordance with the ESPGHAN-Porto criteria.15 The disease classification and behavior were based on the Paris classification.16 CR was defined as a pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index (PCDAI) score of <10.17 Patients with a history of bowel resection distal to the terminal ileum (TI) at follow-up ileocolonoscopy, with failure of intubation up to the TI, and who did not undergo FC level test the day before ileocolonoscopy were excluded.

Baseline demographic and clinical data, including sex, age, disease phenotype, and growth indicators, were obtained from electronic medical records. Data corresponding to the point of ileocolonoscopy examination were also collected from electronic charts or electronic test results, including age at follow-up, disease duration, anti-TNF type, anti-TNF duration, previous bowel resection history, PCDAI score, white blood cell count, hematocrit, platelet count, serum albumin level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), FC levels, and simple endoscopic score for CD18 at follow-up. Blood tests were conducted either the day before or on the same day as ileocolonoscopy, and FC level was tested on the day before ileocolonoscopy. FC levels were measured using fluorometric enzyme immunoassay at Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon and Kyungpook National University Children’s Hospital. FC levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the other three centers. The associations between FC and MH were investigated. MH was defined as the absence of ulcer on ileocolonoscopy.

2. Statistical methods

For statistical comparison between groups, the Student t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables and a chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. Comparative data for continuous variables are reported as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range). The Pearson correlation was used to investigate the correlation between continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between MH and the variables. A univariate logistic regression analysis was first conducted to investigate the crude odds ratio for each factor. Thereafter, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted using a stepwise selection procedure with a p<0.1 significance level for a covariate to enter or remain in the model. The results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to derive the best cutoff point for continuous variables that were identified as statistically significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. De Long test was used to compare the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for FC and CRP in detecting MH and the presence of ulcers. Data were considered statistically significantly different if p-value was <0.05. All analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

1. Patient inclusion and baseline characteristics at diagnosis

A total of 184 patients were included in this study. Among these patients, a history of bowel resection distal to the TI at follow-up ileocolonoscopy was noted in six patients, failure of intubation up to the TI was observed in 15 patients, and FC level was not tested the day before the ileocolonoscopy in 32 patients. These 53 patients were excluded, leaving 131 patients for final inclusion in the study. Among these 131 patients, MH was observed in 87 patients (66.7%) (Fig. 1). The comparison of baseline characteristics between the groups divided according to MH status is summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 1

Patient inclusion and exclusion.

CD, Crohn’s disease; FC, fecal calprotectin; TI, terminal ileum.

Table 1

Comparison of Baseline Variables between Patients with and without Mucosal Healing

Baseline characteristics at diagnosis	MH (n=87)	No MH (n=44)	p-value
Male sex	58 (66.7)	30 (68.2)	1.000
Age, median (IQR), yr	14.0 (12.4–16.1)	13.7 (11.7–15.3)	0.232
Age according to Paris classification			0.809
A1a	7 (8.0)	5 (11.4)
A1b	68 (78.2)	33 (75.0)
A2	12 (13.8)	6 (13.6)
Lower GI tract involvement			0.534
L1	12 (13.8)	3 (6.8)
L2	4 (4.6)	2 (4.5)
L3	71 (81.6)	39 (88.7)
None (isolated L4)	0	0
Upper GI tract involvement			0.732
None	31 (35.6)	16 (36.4)
L4a	19 (21.8)	12 (27.3)
L4a+b	14 (16.1)	8 (18.2)
L4b	23 (26.4)	8 (18.2)
Luminal disease behavior			0.452
B1	75 (86.2)	35 (79.6)
B2	8 (9.2)	7 (15.9)
B3	4 (4.6)	2 (4.5)
Perianal fistulizing disease	38 (43.7)	28 (63.6)	0.049
Linear growth failure	21 (24.1)	11 (25.0)	0.667
Baseline laboratory results at IFX start
WBC, median (IQR),/μL	8,460 (6,355–10,615)	9,145 (6,945–10,810)	0.387
Hematocrit, mean±SD, %	35.8±5.4	35.7±6.1	0.905
Platelet count, median (IQR), ×103/µL	398 (341–515)	429 (336–538)	0.697
Albumin, median (IQR), g/dL	3.9 (3.5–4.0)	3.8 (3.4–4.0)	0.347
ESR, median (IQR), mm/hr	38 (20–62)	38 (25–84)	0.336
CRP, median (IQR), mg/dL	1.2 (0.3–4.9)	1.8 (0.6–4.6)	0.517
FC, median (IQR), mg/kg (n=16)	1,749.1 (917.1–3,234.2)	2,408.2 (789.5–4,469.3)	0.828

Data are presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

MH, mucosal healing; IQR, interquartile range; A1a, 0–9 years; A1b, 10–16 years; A2, 17–18 years; GI, gastrointestinal; L1, distal 1/3 ileum±limited cecal disease; L2, colonic disease; L3, ileocolonic disease; L4a, upper disease proximal to ligament of Treitz; L4b, upper disease distal to the ligament of Treitz and proximal to the distal 1/3 ileum; L4a+b, upper disease involving both L4a and L4b; B1, nonstricturing, nonpenetrating; B2, stricturing; B3, penetrating; IFX, infliximab; WBC, white blood cell; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; FC, fecal calprotectin.

2. Association between FC level and MH

At follow-up ileocolonoscopic examinations, no significant differences were observed between the two groups except PCDAI scores and FC levels (Table 2). FC level was significantly lower in patients with MH than in those without (median 49.0 mg/kg vs 599.0 mg/kg; p<0.001). According to the Pearson correlation, a significant correlation was observed between FC level and simple endoscopic score for CD (ρ=0.68, p<0.001).

Table 2

Comparison of Variables at Follow-up Ileocolonoscopy between Patients with and without Mucosal Healing

Variable	MH (n=87)	No MH (n=44)	p-value
Age, mean±SD, yr	17.4±3.4	17.7±3.6	0.659
Disease duration, median (IQR), yr	2.5 (1.2–5.0)	3.9 (1.6–6.9)	0.109
Duration from diagnosis to first anti-TNF agent, median (IQR), yr	0.27 (0.04–1.59)	0.46 (0.06–1.29)	0.704
Current anti-TNF agent			0.915
Adalimumab	24 (27.6)	11 (25.0)
Infliximab	63 (72.4)	33 (75.0)
Treatment duration of current anti-TNF agent, median (IQR), yr	1.3 (1.0–1.2)	1.5 (0.5–2.8)	0.821
Previous anti-TNF agent usage	6 (6.9)	6 (13.6)	0.217
PCDAI, median (IQR)	0 (0–2.5)	2.5 (0–5)	0.002
WBC, mean±SD,/µL	6,501±1,362	6,561±1,564	0.820
Hematocrit, mean±SD, %	41.7±4.4	41.8±4.2	0.917
Platelet count, median (IQR), ×103/µL	257 (226–306)	274 (230–322)	0.351
Albumin, median (IQR), g/dL	4.5 (4.4–4.7)	4.4 (4.3–4.7)	0.123
ESR, median (IQR), mm/hr	8 (4–17)	12 (7–22)	0.051
ESR <20 mm/hr	71 (81.6)	32 (72.7)	0.344
CRP, median (IQR), mg/dL	0.03 (0.03–0.08)	0.04 (0.03–0.20)	0.223
CRP <0.3 mg/dL	83 (95.4)	37 (84.1)	0.043
FC, median (IQR), mg/kg	49.0 (25.2–107.2)	599.0 (273.9–1,000.0)	<0.001
FC <50 mg/kg	48 (55.2)	2 (4.5)	<0.001
FC <200 mg/kg	71 (81.6)	7 (15.9)	<0.001
FC <600 mg/kg	84 (96.6)	22 (50.0)	<0.001
SES-CD, median (IQR)	0 (0–0)	6 (3–8)	<0.001

Data are presented as number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

MH, mucosal healing; IQR, interquartile range; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; PCDAI, pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index; WBC, white blood cell; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; FC, fecal calprotectin; SES-CD, simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease.

When the patients were divided according to lower gastrointestinal location, there was no significant difference in MH rates between groups (L1, 12/15 [80%]; L2, 4/6 [66.7%]; L3, 71/110 [64.5%]; p=0.534). FC levels were also comparable between groups divided according to lower gastrointestinal location (L1, 55.7 [38.0–458.5] mg/kg; L2, 65.2 [23.6–577.0] mg/kg; L3, 99.0 [37.1–416.3] mg/kg; p=0.761). Additionally, among patients with MH (n=87), there was no significant difference in FC levels between these groups (L1 [n=12], 49.0 [26.6–97.6] mg/kg; L2 [n=4], 27.5 [15.9–65.2] mg/kg; L3 [n=71], 49.2 [25.1–118.9] mg/kg; p=0.427).

3. Factors associated with MH

According to the univariate analysis, concomitant perianal fistulizing disease, PCDAI, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, and FC×102 levels were significantly associated with MH (Table 3). When factors with p-values of <0.1 were included in the multivariate analysis using a stepwise selection procedure, only FC×102 level was associated with MH (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.73; p<0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3

Factors Associated with Mucosal Healing

Factor	Univariate logistic regression				Multivariate logistic regression with stepwise selection
	OR	95% CI	p-value		Adjusted OR	95% CI	p-value
Sex (male vs female)	0.93	0.43–2.03	0.862
Age at diagnosis, yr	1.08	0.95–1.22	0.222
Any TI involvement (yes vs no)	0.99	0.17–5.62	0.989
Any colonic involvement (yes vs no)	0.46	0.12–1.71	0.246
Upper GI tract involvement (yes vs no)	1.03	0.49–2.20	0.934
B1 disease behavior (yes vs no)	1.61	0.62–4.17	0.329
Concomitant perianal fistulizing disease (yes vs no)	0.44	0.21–0.93	0.033		0.43	0.16–1.18	0.100
Disease duration, yr	0.87	0.76–1.00	0.056
Duration from diagnosis to first anti-TNF agent, yr	0.93	0.75–1.14	0.487
Current anti-TNF agent (IFX vs ADL)	0.88	0.38–2.00	0.752
Treatment duration of current anti-TNF agent, yr	0.84	0.66–1.07	0.158
Previous anti-TNF agent usage (yes vs no)	0.47	0.14–1.55	0.215
PCDAI	0.81	0.70–0.93	0.003		0.84	0.70–1.00	0.051
Albumin, g/dL	3.16	0.80–12.44	0.099
ESR, mm/hr	0.97	0.94–1.00	0.042
CRP, mg/dL	0.13	0.02–0.96	0.046
FC, ×102 mg/kg	0.61	0.51–0.73	<0.001		0.62	0.52–0.73	<0.001

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TI, terminal ileum; GI, gastrointestinal; B1, nonstricturing nonpenetrating; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IFX, infliximab; ADL, adalimumab; PCDAI, pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; FC, fecal calprotectin.

4. FC cutoff levels for MH association

According to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal FC cutoff level associated with MH was 140 mg/kg with an AUC of 0.890 (95% confidence interval, 0.829 to 0.951; sensitivity 78.2%, specificity 88.6%, PPV 93.2%, NPV 67.2%, p<0.001). The cutoff levels of FC associated with MH are shown in Table 4. According to De Long test, the AUC of FC for detecting MH was significantly higher than that of CRP for detecting MH (Z=5.82, p<0.001) (Fig. 2).

Table 4

Cutoff Levels of FC for the Assessment of Mucosal Healing

FC cutoff, mg/kg	Sensitivity, %	Specificity, %	PPV, %	NPV, %
<50	95.5	55.2	51.9	96.0
<100	90.9	74.7	64.5	94.2
<140	88.6	78.2	67.2	93.2
<200	84.1	81.6	69.8	91.0
<300	70.5	85.1	70.5	85.1
<400	61.4	92.0	79.4	82.5
<500	56.8	95.4	86.2	81.4
<600	50.0	96.6	88.0	79.3

FC, fecal calprotectin; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

Fig. 2

ROC curves for FC and CRP for the differentiation of patients with and without mucosal healing.

ROC, receiver operating characteristic; FC, fecal calprotectin; CRP, C-reactive protein; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated whether FC could serve as a surrogate marker for assessing MH among pediatric patients with CD in sustained CR for at least 6 months with anti-TNF agents. FC level was significantly associated with MH, and an FC cutoff of <140 mg/kg was associated with MH with a sensitivity of 78.2% and specificity of 88.6%.

Treat-to-target has recently emerged as a strategy to better treat patients with CD and to minimize future complications. The main principles of the treat-to-target strategy are based on risk stratification and timely appropriate treatment, regular monitoring of disease activity, and subsequent adjustment of treatment when inflammation persists.7 According to the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease program, the acknowledged target for treat-to-target in CD is clinical/patient-reported outcome remission, and endoscopic remission, which is recommended 6 to 9 months from treatment initiation.8 For those who cannot be adequately assessed with ileocolonoscopy, cross-sectional imaging studies are recommended as an alternative exam.8 Meanwhile, biomarker remission, defined as a normal CRP and FC level was considered an adjunctive target.8 Despite these recommendations of Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease program, limitations regarding cost, availability, invasiveness, and complexity exists with ileocolonoscopy and cross-sectional imaging, questioning whether they are feasible as modalities for repetitive monitoring.19

Considering the limitations in repetitive performances of ileocolonoscopy in children, pediatric gastroenterologists should have a clear treatment plan before they conduct a follow-up ileocolonoscopy. In pediatric patients with CD who are in CR but not in MH during treatment with conventional drugs, stepping up treatment to an anti-TNF agent would be a reasonable choice. However, if patients are already receiving treatment with an intensified dose of an anti-TNF agent and are in CR but not MH, it is questionable whether these patients should change their drugs. Of course, there should be a role of therapeutic drug monitoring in these situations.20-22 However, it is still questionable whether their anti-TNF drug should be changed when they are in CR and have only mild disease on ileocolonoscopy, especially in children with CD who only have two licensed drugs to use, namely infliximab and adalimumab.

Therefore, instead of conducting mere repetitive endoscopic exams in these patients, knowing which patients will likely be in MH or not is important for planning future treatment. In patients who are likely in MH based on FC levels, postponing a regular ileocolonoscopy to a near future and thus lengthening the intervals between regular exams may be better to avoid frequent repetitive exams. Meanwhile, in patients who are not likely in MH based on FC levels, the initially scheduled endoscopic evaluation would be necessary. Additionally, because FC can vary according to environmental factors such as diet,23 consecutive elevated FC levels may be better than a single elevated FC level for deciding whether to postpone an ileocolonoscopy or not.24-26 However, this approach does not imply that FC can substitute ileocolonoscopy. Because of the limitations regarding the relatively low sensitivity of FC in detecting MH and uncertainty in optimal cutoffs, ileocolonoscopy still should be the mainstay to evaluate MH and disease activity in CD in the treat-to-target era.8

While high FC levels suggest mucosal inflammation and a normal FC is associated with endoscopic, and potentially radiographic and histologic remission, uncertainty remains regarding optimal test cut-points.19 Studies have suggested different cutoff values of FC for discriminating between active and inactive CD. D’Haens et al.9 demonstrated in a cohort of 87 adult patients with CD that an FC cutoff of <250 μg/g was capable of detecting endoscopic remission with 94% sensitivity and 62.2% specificity. Sipponen et al.10 reported in a study of 77 adult patients with CD that an FC cutoff of <200 mg/kg was capable of detecting endoscopically inactive CD with 70% sensitivity and 92% specificity. In a study in children, Zubin and Peter12 investigated the correlation between endoscopic disease activity and FC level by examining 32 newly diagnosed CD patients with a median age of 13.5 years, who were offered exclusive enteral nutrition or steroid as induction therapy and were initiated on early thiopurines. They suggested that the adult FC cutoff value of <200 mg/kg was not appropriate in the pediatric population for detecting endoscopic disease activity and that an FC cutoff of <500 mg/kg provided a greater sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 80% and was more appropriate for children.12 According to another prospective study in 58 pediatric patients aged 11.8 to 14.9 years, the optimal cutoff of FC to discriminate between remission and active disease was 143 mg/kg, which had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 64%.27

In this study, an FC cutoff level of <140 mg/kg was capable of detecting MH with a sensitivity of 78.2% and specificity of 88.6%, which revealed a higher specificity at lower FC cutoff levels than the previous studies in children, but rather similar to the aforementioned study in adults by Sipponen et al. The difference with previous pediatric studies may be due to the difference in the population included in this study. First, the median age of patients at follow-up ileocolonoscopy was 17.5 years, which is older than that of previous studies conducted in children of which the mean age was 13.9 to 14.2 years.13,27 Second, patients in sustained CR with anti-TNF agents for at least 6 months were included in this study. Therefore, the proportion of patients in MH in this study (66.4%) was higher than that of a previous study in children of which MH rates were only 20%.13 Another possible explanation is that among patients with MH, the majority may have achieved further histologic remission. Moreover, considering that all patients in this study were receiving treatment with anti-TNF agents, the proportion of patients who had achieved a more stringent histologic remission in addition to endoscopic remission may have been higher in this study. Studies in patients with ulcerative colitis have revealed a stronger correlation between FC level and histologic remission than between FC level and endoscopic remission.28,29 This may have resulted in the derivation of a lower cutoff value for FC in discriminating between endoscopically active and inactive CD.

Meanwhile, the superiority of FC over CRP in detecting endoscopic activity has been reported in several studies.11,30,31 Although CRP and FC are one of the most used biomarkers for assessing disease activity in CD, the limitation of CRP as a surrogate marker for endoscopic activity is its poor sensitivity.31 Studies in pediatric patients with CD have shown that adding CRP to FC is better than using FC alone in detecting endoscopic remission.12,32 However, the AUC curve of CRP was consistently below that of FC in this study, indicating that there was no additional benefit of adding CRP to FC for discriminating those with and without MH on endoscopy.

This study has some limitations. First, this was a retrospective, cross-sectional study with certain limitations compared to studies with a prospective design. Moreover, because FC tests have been available in Korea since 2016, the majority of the patients lacked FC levels at diagnosis and at the initiation of infliximab treatment. Therefore, we were unable to confirm whether the change in FC level could reflect the change in endoscopic activity, and also the impact of baseline FC on achieving MH during treatment. Second, selection bias may have been introduced by excluding patients in whom intubation up to the TI was impossible. Additionally, despite the low proportion of patients whose disease involvement was only proximal to the ileocecal valve (11.5%), FC levels in these patients may have not well reflected the degree of inflammation in the small bowel. There are speculations that the diagnostic accuracy of FC in CD may be influenced by different disease location.33 Several studies have shown that FC levels were lower in patients with small bowel disease compared to those with large bowel involvement.10,34 However, we were unable to observe such findings probably due to the small number of patients with L1 and L2 disease. Third, differences in FC measurement tests among centers may have affected the results of this study. However, according to a study, the accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and fluorometric enzyme immunoassay in measuring FC level was comparable.35 Fourth, we were unable to investigate the correlation between FC level and histologic remission. Biopsies were not conducted in some patients with MH. Moreover, as CD involves the bowel discontinuously, there are also limitations in obtaining tissue biopsies from all previously involved sites. Nonetheless, Zittan et al.29 suggested that FC is a noninvasive biomarker for both endoscopic healing and histological remission in adult patients with colonic CD. According to this study, FC levels of <100 mg/kg had the strongest negative predictive value and the highest sensitivity for histological remission compared with endoscopic remission and CR. Further prospective studies are required to determine whether FC level correlates with histologic inflammation in CD.

In conclusion, FC may serve as a good surrogate marker for detecting MH in pediatric patients with CD in sustained CR for at least 6 months with anti-TNF agents. In these patients, FC may guide in stratifying those who require their scheduled ileocolonoscopy from those who may postpone their regular ileocolonoscopy to a near future.