| Literature DB >> 33832588 |
Bryan Brummelhaus de Menezes1, Lucas Mironuk Frescura1, Rafael Duarte1, Marcos Antonio Villetti2, Marcelo Barcellos da Rosa3.
Abstract
The DPPH method has been reported with misconceptions in a large number of studies, thus precluding comparison of results. Attention is drawn to a common mistake in the unit used to express the IC50 of ascorbic acid and other antioxidant substances. Concentration of the antioxidant is widely misused with a total disregard for the DPPH• concentration, while the molar ratio of antioxidant/DPPH• would be the correct choice. Data from 26 studies with widely varying IC50 values were renormalized according to reaction stoichiometry, resulting in values which are more coherent and closer to the ideal one of 0.25 for at least 15 of them. In addition, the model which is currently being used to calculate the DPPH• concentration can lead to an overestimation of around 7%, as it does not take into account the small contribution of the reaction product. In view of that, we present a mathematical model to correct the overestimation of the DPPH• concentration.Entities:
Keywords: 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazine (PubChem CID: 74358); 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (PubChem CID: 31404); DPPH; IC(50) correction; Mathematical model; Stoichiometry; l-ascorbic acid (PubChem CID: 54670067)
Year: 2021 PMID: 33832588 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Chim Acta ISSN: 0003-2670 Impact factor: 6.558