| Literature DB >> 33832450 |
Benjamin Amoani1,2, Ben Gyan3, Samuel Asamoah Sakyi4, Emmanuel Kwasi Abu5, Samuel Victor Nuvor6, Precious Barnes7, Tracy Sarkodie-Addo3, Benjamin Ahenkorah2,8, Christian Sewor1, Duah Dwomoh9, Michael Theisen10,11, Michael Cappello12, Michael D Wilson13, Bright Adu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria and helminths diseases are co-endemic in most parts of sub-Saharan Africa. Immune responses from each of these pathogens interact, and these interactions may have implications on vaccines. The GMZ2 malaria vaccine candidate is a fusion protein of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 3 (MSP3) and glutamate rich protein (GLURP R0). GMZ2 has recently showed modest efficacy in a phase IIb multicenter trial. Here, we assessed the effect of hookworm (Necator americanus) infection and anthelmintic treatment on naturally acquired antibody responses against GMZ2 and constituent antigens.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33832450 PMCID: PMC8028774 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06027-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population
| Male n (%) | 20 (33.9) | 43 (68.3) | 16 (44.4) | 17 (42.5) | – |
| Female n (%) | 39 (66.1) | 20 (31.7) | 20 (55.6) | 23 (57.5) | |
| Age (Mean ± S.D) | 16.2 ± 14.26 | 16.19 ± 10.55 | 36.32 ± 19.27 | 31.88 ± 18.71 | < 0.0001a |
| Pf density (Mean ± S.D) | 1481 ± 3263 | 794.4 ± 2021 | – | – | 0.1621b |
a Analysis was done using ANOVA; b Analysis was done using Unpaired T-test. Analysis was done only on Pre-treatment data
Fig. 1Isotype IgM and IgG sub-class levels in relation to age. Plots are shown (from top to bottom) for IgM, IgG1 and IgG3, levels against age (years), respectively for: a GMZ2, b GLURP R0 and c MSP3. r2 and p-values obtained from linear regressions are shown for each plot. Analysis was done for individuals who were single infected with P, falciparum or coinfected with hookworm. Figure 1 analysis was done for the pre-treatment data
Antibody responses against GMZ2 and constituent antigens in relation to malaria and hookworm infections
| Antibody | Antigen | β (95%CI) | β (95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgG1 | GMZ2 | 0.01 (−0.66, 0.69) | 0.967 | −0.41 (−1.08. 0.26) | 0.233 |
| GLURP-R0 | 0.39 (−0.33, 1.53) | 0.184 | 0.82 (0.31, 1.51) | ||
| MSP3 | −0.26 (− 0.80, 0.28) | 0.346 | 0.23 (− 0.32, 0.78) | 0.402 | |
| IgG3 | GMZ2 | 0.30 (−0.57, 1.18) | 0.495 | 0.3 (1.04, 1.10) | |
| GLURP-R0 | 0.26 (−0.61, 1.14) | 0.554 | 0.61 (−0.38, 1.60) | 0.226 | |
| MSP3 | 0.37 (−0.17, 1.72) | 0.358 | 0.24 (−0.53, 1.01) | 0.537 | |
| IgM | GMZ2 | 0.13 (−0.26, 0.53) | 0.503 | 0.05 (−.030, 0.40) | 0.774 |
| GLURP-R0 | 0.08 (−0.66, 0.49) | 0.771 | 0.26 (−0.24, 0.78) | 0.300 | |
| MSP3 | −0.01 (− 0.32, 0.29) | 0.924 | 0.13 (− 0.22, 0.49) | 0.458 | |
Multivariate multiple linear regression analysis adjusting for age and sex. β Estimated effect of covariate on antibody level, CI Confidence interval, Na Na, Necator americanus, Pf Plasmodium falciparum. Arbitrary antibody unit were log10 transformed. EC group was set as reference for the model. Analysis was done only on pre-treatment data
Effect of albendazole treatment on antibody levels against GMZ2 and constituent in Na/Pf co-infected individuals
| Vaccine antigens | Pretreatment ( | Post treatment ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IgG1 | 38.2(10.2,90.6) | 30.0(11.2,66.8) | |
| IgG3 | 34.6(4.5, 142.0) | 28.3(2.7121.3) | |
| IgM | 192.5(137.3326.2) | 212.6(106.9400.0) | 0.403 |
| IgG1 | 8.5(2.6,29.0) | 8.2(0.9,24.3) | 0.647 |
| IgG3 | 14.3(2.0,45.4) | 13.6(3.00,30.6) | |
| IgM | 155.8(88.8375.1) | 139.5(81.2, 385.8) | 0.184 |
| IgG1 | 56.2(28.5143.8) | 41.7(28.0,52.7) | |
| IgG3 | 44.9(8.3167.2) | 50.1(23.9, 128.2) | 0.130 |
| IgM | 332.8(269.2452.8) | 36.3(10.6149.2) | |
Values are median (quartile). P-values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
This analysis was done for those with hookworm and malaria parasites co-infection; pre-treatment (n = 57) and post-treatment (n = 57). Six individuals were lost during the post-treatment follow up
Abbreviations: LQ Lower Quartile, UQ Upper Quartile