Abhinav J Appukutty1, Lesli E Skolarus2,3, Mellanie V Springer2, William J Meurer2,4, James F Burke5,6. 1. University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 2. Stroke Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 3. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 4. Emergency Department, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. 5. Stroke Program, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. jamesbur@med.umich.edu. 6. Department of Neurology, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA. jamesbur@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke incidence is reportedly increasing in younger populations, although the reasons for this are not clear. We explored possible reasons by quantifying trends in neurologically focused emergency department (ED) visits, classification of stroke vs. TIA, and imaging use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, serial, cross-sectional study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine time trends in age-stratified primary reasons for visit, stroke/TIA diagnoses, and MRI utilization from 1995 to 2000 and 2005-2015. RESULTS: Five million eight hundred thousand ED visits with a primary diagnosis of stroke (CI 5.3 M-6.4 M) were represented in the data. The incidence of neurologically focused reason for visits (Neuro RFVs) increased over time in both the young and in older adults (young: + 111 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 94 - + 130; older adults: + 70 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 34 - + 108). The proportion of combined stroke and TIA diagnoses decreased over time amongst older adults with a Neuro RFV (OR 0.95 per year, p < 0.01, CI 0.94-0.96) but did not change in the young (OR 1.00 per year, p = 0.88, CI 0.95-1.04). Within the stroke/TIA population, no changes in the proportion of stroke or TIA were identified. MRI utilization rates amongst patients with a Neuro RFV increased for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found, but did not anticipate, increased incidence of neurologically focused ED visits in both age groups. Given the lower pre-test probability of a stroke in younger adults, this suggests that false positive stroke diagnoses may be increasing and may be increasing more rapidly in the young than in older adults.
BACKGROUND:Stroke incidence is reportedly increasing in younger populations, although the reasons for this are not clear. We explored possible reasons by quantifying trends in neurologically focused emergency department (ED) visits, classification of stroke vs. TIA, and imaging use. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, serial, cross-sectional study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine time trends in age-stratified primary reasons for visit, stroke/TIA diagnoses, and MRI utilization from 1995 to 2000 and 2005-2015. RESULTS: Five million eight hundred thousand ED visits with a primary diagnosis of stroke (CI 5.3 M-6.4 M) were represented in the data. The incidence of neurologically focused reason for visits (Neuro RFVs) increased over time in both the young and in older adults (young: + 111 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 94 - + 130; older adults: + 70 Neuro RFVs/100,000 population/year, CI + 34 - + 108). The proportion of combined stroke and TIA diagnoses decreased over time amongst older adults with a Neuro RFV (OR 0.95 per year, p < 0.01, CI 0.94-0.96) but did not change in the young (OR 1.00 per year, p = 0.88, CI 0.95-1.04). Within the stroke/TIA population, no changes in the proportion of stroke or TIA were identified. MRI utilization rates amongst patients with a Neuro RFV increased for both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found, but did not anticipate, increased incidence of neurologically focused ED visits in both age groups. Given the lower pre-test probability of a stroke in younger adults, this suggests that false positive stroke diagnoses may be increasing and may be increasing more rapidly in the young than in older adults.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnosis; Epidemiology; False positive; Stroke; Stroke in the young
Authors: Gregory W Albers; Louis R Caplan; J Donald Easton; Pierre B Fayad; J P Mohr; Jeffrey L Saver; David G Sherman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-11-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brett M Kissela; Jane C Khoury; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Daniel Woo; Opeolu Adeoye; Matthew L Flaherty; Pooja Khatri; Simona Ferioli; Felipe De Los Rios La Rosa; Joseph P Broderick; Dawn O Kleindorfer Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Silvia Koton; Yingying Sang; Andrea L C Schneider; Wayne D Rosamond; Rebecca F Gottesman; Josef Coresh Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Chengwei Li; Jonggyu Baek; Brisa N Sanchez; Lewis B Morgenstern; Lynda D Lisabeth Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Fredrik A Dahl; Mathias Barra; Kashif W Faiz; Hege Ihle-Hansen; Halvor Næss; Kim Rand; Ole Morten Rønning; Tone Breines Simonsen; Bente Thommessen; Angela S Labberton Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 2.655