Literature DB >> 33832177

Different signaling pathways of induced resistance by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana against two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae.

Choong-Min Ryu1,2, Chia-Hui Hu1, M S Reddy1, Joseph W Kloepper1.   

Abstract

•  The mechanisms by which plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) mediate induced systemic resistance are currently being intensively investigated from the viewpoint of signal transduction pathways within plants. •  Here, we determined whether our well-characterized PGPR strains, which have demonstrated induced resistance on various plants, also elicit induced resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nine different PGPR strains were evaluated for their capacity to cause induced resistance on Arabidopsis against two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae. Six strains significantly reduced severity of P. syringae pv. tomato, whereas seven strains reduced severity of P. syringae pv. maculicola. •  From the initial screenings, four strains (90-166, SE34, 89B61 and T4) were selected because of their consistent induced resistance capacity. Elicitation of induced resistance with these strains depended on how disease severity was measured. Three strains (90-166, 89B61 and T4) induced resistance in NahG plants (SA-deficient), indicating a salicylic acid-independent pathway, which agrees with the previously reported pathway for induced resistance by PGPR. However, differences from the reported pathway were noted with strain 89B61, which did not require jasmonic acid or ethylene signaling pathways for induced resistance, and with strain T4, which induced resistance in npr1 plants. •  These results indicate that strains 89B61 and T4 induce resistance via a new pathway or possibly a variation of the previously reported pathway. This information will broaden our understanding of ways in which microorganisms can signal physiological changes in plants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis thaliana; Pseudomonas syringae; induced resistance; plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Year:  2003        PMID: 33832177     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00883.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  11 in total

1.  EIN2, a bifunctional transducer of ethylene and stress responses in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J M Alonso; T Hirayama; G Roman; S Nourizadeh; J R Ecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Switching on plant genes by external chemical signals.

Authors:  J A Pickett; G M Poppy
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 18.313

3.  Quantitative nature of Arabidopsis responses during compatible and incompatible interactions with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

Authors:  Yi Tao; Zhiyi Xie; Wenqiong Chen; Jane Glazebrook; Hur-Song Chang; Bin Han; Tong Zhu; Guangzhou Zou; Fumiaki Katagiri
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Age-related resistance in Arabidopsis is a developmentally regulated defense response to Pseudomonas syringae.

Authors:  Julianne V Kus; Kasia Zaton; Raani Sarkar; Robin K Cameron
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression.

Authors:  C M Pieterse; S C van Wees; E Hoffland; J A van Pelt; L C van Loon
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 6.  Molecular genetics of plant disease resistance.

Authors:  B J Staskawicz; F M Ausubel; B J Baker; J G Ellis; J D Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Hypersensitive response-related death.

Authors:  M C Heath
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Differential effectiveness of salicylate-dependent and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent induced resistance in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Jurriaan Ton; Johan A Van Pelt; L C Van Loon; Corné M J Pieterse
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Loss of non-host resistance of Arabidopsis NahG to Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola is due to degradation products of salicylic acid.

Authors:  Saskia C M van Wees; Jane Glazebrook
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  Characterization of an Arabidopsis Mutant That Is Nonresponsive to Inducers of Systemic Acquired Resistance.

Authors:  H. Cao; S. A. Bowling; A. S. Gordon; X. Dong
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 11.277

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of Root-Colonizing Fluorescent Pseudomonas Strains on Arabidopsis Resistance to a Pathogen and an Herbivore.

Authors:  Tobias B Löser; Mark C Mescher; Consuelo M De Moraes; Monika Maurhofer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Development of plant systemic resistance by beneficial rhizobacteria: Recognition, initiation, elicitation and regulation.

Authors:  Lin Zhu; Jiameng Huang; Xiaoming Lu; Cheng Zhou
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Bacillus firmus I-1582 promotes plant growth and impairs infection and development of the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii over two generations.

Authors:  Mengmeng Huang; Aylin Bulut; Bidhya Shrestha; Christiane Matera; Florian M W Grundler; A Sylvia S Schleker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A Path Forward: Promoting Microbial-Based Methods in the Control of Invasive Plant Species.

Authors:  Maryam Shahrtash; Shawn P Brown
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.