| Literature DB >> 33832085 |
Zhang-Xiang Wu1, Chao Wang, Zheng Huang, Xue-Han Liu, Mei Shen.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Wrist-hand extension function rehabilitation is a vital and difficult part of hand function recovery in spastic stroke patients. Although botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) injection plus post injection therapy was applied to the wrist-hand rehabilitation in previous reports, conclusion was inconsistent in promoting function. For this phenomenon, proper selection of patients for BoNTA injection and correct choice of post-injection intervention could be the crucial factors for the function recovery. PATIENT CONCERNS: We reported a 46-year-old male suffered a spastic hemiplegia with wrist- hand extension deficit. DIAGNOSES: Computed tomography showed cerebral hemorrhage in the left basal ganglia region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33832085 PMCID: PMC8036039 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Time schedule of this study. BoNTA, botulinum neurotoxin type A.
Dose of BoNTA injection.
| Injected muscle | Dose (unit) |
| flexor carpi ulnaris | 50 |
| flexor carpi radialis | 50 |
| flexor digitorum profundus | 50 |
| flexor digitorum superficialis | 50 |
| flexor pollicis longus | 30 |
| pronator teres | 30 |
| palmaris longus | 30 |
| brachioradialis | 20 |
| biceps brachii | 80 |
| brachialis | 10 |
Figure 2Botulinum toxin type A injection through ultrasound-guided (A), E-link biofeedback games training program (B).
Outcome measures after the intervention.
| T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | |
| Active ROM of wrist extension (°) | −15 | −5 | 27 | 25 |
| Active wrist extensors strength (N) | / | / | 10.6 | 8.6 |
| MAS for wrist flexion (score) | 2 | 1+ | 1 | 1+ |
| sEMG of wrist extensors RMS (μV) | 25 | 43 | 91 | 77 |
| MF (Hz) | 64 | 71 | 107 | 85 |
| IEGM (μVs) | 652 | 841 | 2032 | 1601 |
Data present as mean score.
ROM = range of motion, sEMG = surface electromyography, RMS = root mean square, MAS = Modified Ashworth Scale, WMFT = Wolf Motor Function Test (functional section), IEGM = integrate electromyography, MF = median frequency, T1 = baseline, T1 = day 3, T2 = week 4, T3 = 3-month follow-up, a diagonal line (/) means measurement cannot be accomplished.
Score alteration of Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT).
| Item | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
| Forearm to table (side) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Forearm to box (side) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Extend elbow (side) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Extend elbow (weight) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Hand to table (front) | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Hand to box (front) | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Reach and retrieve | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Lift can | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Lift pencil | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Lift paper clip | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Stack checkers | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Flip cards | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Turn key in lock | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Fold towel | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Lift basket | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Mean Score | 2.07 | 2.13 | 2.80 | 3.06 |
Fifteen upper limb functional tasks are incorporated to assess movement components required for daily tasks. Quality of movement is assessed with scores ranging from 0 to 5. 0 = not attempted, 1 = attempt made, but not participating functionally, 2 = movement does participate, but needs more than 2 attempts, assistance, compensatory movements, or performing task very slowly, 3 = movement does participate, but affected by synergy or finishing task slowly, 4 = movement approximately normal, but slightly slower, or lacking fine coordination, 5 = normal movement, T0 = baseline, T1 = day 3, T2 = week 4, T3 = 3-month follow-up.
Figure 3RMS and IEGM value variation in different assessing time. RMS = root mean square, IEGM = integrate electromyography, T0 = baseline, T1 = day 3, T2 = week 4, T3 = 3-month follow-up.
Figure 4MF value variation during five-second isometric maximum voluntary contraction for different assessing time. MF = median frequency, T0 = baseline, T1 = day 3, T2 = week 4, T3 = 3-month follow-up.