| Literature DB >> 33831676 |
Ning Zhou1, Jean-Pierre T F Ho2, Zhengfei Huang3, René Spijker4, Nico de Vries5, Ghizlane Aarab6, Frank Lobbezoo6, Madeline J L Ravesloot7, Jan de Lange2.
Abstract
Multilevel surgery (MLS) and maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA) are two established options in surgical management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which target different levels of airway obstruction. The objective of this review was to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of MMA and MLS in the treatment of OSA. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for studies on MMA and/or MLS in OSA patients. Twenty MMA studies and 39 MLS studies were identified. OSA patients who underwent MMA showed significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, ODI, and ESS by -46.2/h, 13.5%, -30.3/h, and -8.5, respectively. The pooled rates of surgical success and cure for MMA were 85.0% and 46.3%, respectively. Patients who underwent MLS showed significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, ODI, and ESS by -24.7/h, 8.7%, -19.1/h, and -5.8, respectively. The pooled surgical success and cure rates for MLS were 65.1% and 28.1%, respectively. The rates of major complication of MMA and MLS were 3.2% and 1.1%, respectively, and the rate of minor complication of MMA was higher than that of MLS. We conclude that both MMA and MLS are effective treatment options for OSA. Compared to MLS, MMA may be more effective in improving OSA. However, the complication rate of MMA is higher.Entities:
Keywords: Maxillomandibular advancement; Meta-analysis; Multilevel surgery; Obstructive sleep apnea; Surgery; Systematic review
Year: 2021 PMID: 33831676 DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sleep Med Rev ISSN: 1087-0792 Impact factor: 11.609