| Literature DB >> 33830676 |
Shi Li1, Tao Guo1, Miao Yao1, Jiaxing Song1, Wen Ding1, Yiming Mao1, Jialin Chen1.
Abstract
The influence of Bi2 O3 particles size at the sub-micron scale on the thermal excitation threshold and combustion performance of nano-thermite systems was investigated. Three formulas were designed and prepared, Al(100 nm)/Bi2 O3 (170 nm), Al(100 nm)/Bi2 O3 (370 nm) and Al(100 nm)/Bi2 O3 (740 nm). The samples were characterized and tested by SEM, XRD, and DSC techniques. Electrical ignition and combustion experiments were performed. The results showed that with the increase of the particle size of Bi2 O3 , in the case of slow linear heating, the exothermic heat decreased (1051.2 J g-1 , 527.3 J g-1 and 243.6 J g-1 ) and the thermal excitation threshold temperature increased (564.52 °C, 658.1 °C and 810.9 °C). Simultaneously, the state of the thermite reaction correspondingly changed to solid-solid, liquid-solid and liquid-liquid thermite reaction. In the case of rapid heating , the increase in particle size increased the excitation current (0.561A, 0.710A and 0.837A). During the combustion process, the thermite system with the smallest Bi2 O3 particle size showed the largest combustion rate, and that with the largest particle size had the longest combustion duration.Entities:
Keywords: combustion properties; excitation current value; heat release; particles size; thermal excitation threshold
Year: 2021 PMID: 33830676 PMCID: PMC8028500 DOI: 10.1002/open.202000358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.630
Figure 1SEM and particle size distribution of Bi2O3.
Comparison table of Bi2O3 morphology and particle.
|
Sample |
Crystal form |
Average particle size |
Topography |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bi2O3‐1 |
Monoclinic |
170 nm |
globular |
|
Bi2O3‐2 |
Monoclinic |
370 nm |
strip |
|
Bi2O3‐3 |
Monoclinic |
740 nm |
square |
Figure 2XRD characterization of Bi2O3.
Figure 3SEM and particle size distribution of Bi2O3.
Figure 4The DSC curves of the thermites.
Thermite thermal analysis summary table.
|
|
Peak 1 |
Peak 2 |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sample |
T/°C |
Qm/ J g−1 |
St |
T/°C |
Qm/ J g−1 |
St |
Qm/ J g−1 |
|
Al‐Bi2O3‐1 |
564.52 |
610.1 |
S‐S |
647.6 |
441.1 |
S‐S/l‐S |
1051.2 |
|
Al‐Bi2O3‐2 |
658.1 |
527.3 |
l‐S |
– |
– |
– |
527.3 |
|
Al‐Bi2O3‐3 |
810.9 |
243.6 |
l‐S/l‐l |
– |
– |
– |
243.6 |
Note: T: ignition of temperature Q: heat release St: reactant state
Figure 6Schematic diagram of electric ignition excitation device.
Summary of excitation current.
|
Sample |
Excitation current value/A |
E(I)/A |
S1/2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Al‐Bi2O3‐1 |
0.503 |
0.541 |
0.640 |
0.561 |
0.0673 |
|
Al‐Bi2O3‐2 |
0.713 |
0.701 |
0.716 |
0.710 |
0.0290 |
|
Al‐Bi2O3‐3 |
0.848 |
0.813 |
0.849 |
0.837 |
0.0065 |
Figure 5Electric ignition combustion diagram.