Effectiveness of Telmisartan on Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients in India: A Real-World Retrospective Study from Electronic Medical Records.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of telmisartan has been reported in Indian clinical trials; however, real-world data are limited. We aimed to provide real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness of telmisartan as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) in Indian patients with essential hypertension.
METHODS: Electronic medical record data of adult patients diagnosed with essential hypertension (≥ 140/90 mmHg) and who were prescribed telmisartan as mono- or add-on therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified according to the number of AHD classes prescribed on initiating telmisartan. Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) after a month of treatment and the proportion of patients who achieved treatment goals according to the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension guidelines were evaluated.
RESULTS: A majority (90.6%) of the 1304 patients included in the study were on telmisartan monotherapy or telmisartan + 1 AHD. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in the telmisartan monotherapy group was SBP (-13.3 [-14.6, -12.0] mmHg) and DBP (-7.2 [-7.9, -6.5] mmHg), and the mean (95% CI) change in the telmisartan + 1 AHD group was SBP (-10.8 [-13.1, -8.5] mmHg) and DBP (-6.5 [-7.7, -5.3] mmHg) (P < 0.001 for all). SBP and DBP goals were achieved by 35.9% and 47.3% of patients on telmisartan monotherapy and by 35.9% and 46.8% of patients on telmisartan + 1 AHD. Among patients with comorbid diabetes, the mean (95% CI) change in the telmisartan monotherapy group was SBP (-13.3 [-15.0, -11.6] mmHg) and DBP (-7.3 [-8.2, -6.5] mmHg), and the mean (95% CI) change in the telmisartan + 1 AHD group was SBP (-13.0 [-16.5, -9.5] mmHg) and DBP (-6.9 [-8.7, -5.1] mmHg) (P < 0.001 for all). SBP and DBP goals were achieved by 31.7% and 39.7% of patients on telmisartan monotherapy and by 31.9% and 41.8% of patients on telmisartan + 1 AHD.
CONCLUSION: Telmisartan may be a good candidate for blood pressure control in Indian patients with essential hypertension and comorbidities.

Key Summary Points

Digital Features

This article is published with digital features, including a summary slide, to facilitate understanding of the article. To view digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14199011.

Introduction

Hypertension, a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases such as arrhythmia, stroke, and valvular heart disease [1] is on the rise globally. In India, the Great India Blood Pressure survey reported 234 million adults with hypertension [2], with around 98,912 deaths and over 2.5 million disability-adjusted life-years attributed to hypertensive heart disease in 2017 [3]. Poor control of hypertension also results in higher healthcare resource utilization and costs [4]. In spite of the negative outcomes of hypertension, overall awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in India remains poor [5, 6].

A plethora of guidelines, including the 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee evidence-based guidelines [7], 2017 American College of Cardiology guidelines [8], 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guidelines [9], and 2019 Indian Guidelines on Hypertension–IV (IGH-IV) [10], describe the definition, evaluation, classification, and management of hypertension. Angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARBs) are one of the first-line drug classes recommended by the aforementioned guidelines [7-10]. In line with these guidelines, multiple observational studies have reported the use of ARBs as first-line therapy both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) for the management of essential hypertension in India [11-16]. Among ARBs, telmisartan was reported to be preferred by almost 73% of physicians in India as a first-line agent for managing essential hypertension [11].

Telmisartan has been proven to be effective in reducing blood pressure in Indian patients with hypertension in clinical trials [17, 18] as well as a few real-world studies [19, 20]. However, the real-world data currently available are either more than a decade old or localized to a single center. Moreover, these studies evaluated telmisartan either as monotherapy or in a single combination. We conducted the present study to provide updated evidence regarding the effectiveness of telmisartan as mono- or add-on therapy among Indian patients with essential hypertension in a real-world setting.

Methods

Data Source(s)

Analysis was performed with an Indian electronic software owned and administered by HealthPlix Technologies PRV. This software has been in operation since 2016 and fulfills the day-to-day operational needs of 12 medical specialties across 150+ cities in 20 states. Information including demographics, diagnoses, medications, cardiac risk factors, tests and procedures conducted, functional status, and other data elements obtained from the software were used to conduct the analysis.

The study was conducted according to the applicable national regulatory laws and guidelines. The study protocol was approved by an independent ethics committee (Suraksha—Ethics Committee, Asian Institute of Medical Sciences [AIIMS], Dombivli, Maharashtra, India) on 03 December, 2019. Patient confidentiality was maintained at all times, as the study was performed using anonymized information only.

Study Design and Sample Selection

This retrospective observational study assessed the electronic medical record (EMR) data of Indian patients diagnosed with essential hypertension between January 2018 and September 2019. HealthPlix Technologies PRV identified the AHDs that were prescribed to the patients by mapping the brand name on the prescriptions with the generic name. Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who were diagnosed with essential hypertension by their physicians according to the 2018 ESC/ESH [9] and 2019 IGH-IV guidelines [10] (≥ 140/90 mmHg) at baseline, were prescribed telmisartan either as monotherapy or add-on therapy, and had data available for at least two visits with a minimum gap of 1 month after initiation of telmisartan were included in the study. Patients diagnosed with secondary hypertension and those on other ARBs at visit 1 (baseline) were excluded from the study.

Each patient was required to have two valid blood pressure (BP) readings in the EMR. Visit 1 (baseline) reading was the BP measurement taken on the day of telmisartan initiation, and visit 2 reading was the first available BP reading after ≥ 30 days of telmisartan initiation. The gap of ≥ 30 days was observed because a smaller gap between visits might result in inaccurate analyses. This reading was required to be obtained before the earliest event among telmisartan discontinuation, initiation of any other AHD, or end of study period. Further readings available until telmisartan discontinuation, addition of new therapy, or up to end of study were collected.

Study Endpoints

The primary endpoint was the mean change in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to post-index (composite of telmisartan discontinuation, addition of new therapy, or up to end of study) in patients prescribed telmisartan. The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with essential hypertension on telmisartan who achieved individualized BP goals (SBP and DBP) according to ESC/ESH 2018 guidelines from baseline to post-index (telmisartan discontinuation, addition of new therapy, or up to end of study). These endpoints were also assessed according to subgroups (age; gender; and comorbid diabetes, chronic kidney disease [CKD], coronary artery disease [CAD], stroke, or dyslipidemia).

Assessments

Demographic characteristics including age, gender, personal and family history, and clinical characteristics such as grade of hypertension according to ESC/ESH 2018 guidelines, BP readings, comorbidities as diagnosed by the physician, medications used within the previous 30 days (identified based on prescriptions), and laboratory data and electrocardiogram in the last 6 months (if available) were collected at baseline. Data regarding BP, medications in use, and laboratory data were collected from the next visit.

Prior antihypertensive therapy was defined as the use of any AHDs before initiation of telmisartan that were not discontinued on or before the start of telmisartan therapy. Prior AHDs were classified into the following groups: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, β-blockers, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and others (α-blockers, vasodilators, methyldopa, clonidine, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists). Patients using fixed-dose combination products were classified as receiving AHDs in each of the classes. Patients were also classified into one of the following groups depending on the number of AHD classes they received at the start of telmisartan therapy: no other AHD (telmisartan monotherapy), telmisartan + 1 AHD, telmisartan + 2 AHDs, and telmisartan + 3 AHDs.

Statistical Analysis

All study variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. Frequency and percentages were reported for categorical variables, while means and standard deviations were reported for continuous variables. Changes in continuous variables were reported as mean change with 95% confidence intervals (CI). P values were calculated using the Altman and Bland method [21], and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Among the 1304 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study (Fig. 1), 1181 (90.6%) were prescribed telmisartan as monotherapy or along with one other AHD. Patients on telmisartan monotherapy were the youngest (mean ± SD age 53.2 ± 12.0 years), while those on telmisartan + 3 AHDs were the oldest (mean ± SD age 62.9 ± 10.9 years). The latter group also had the highest proportion of women (56.0%). The highest proportion of diabetes mellitus was reported by patients on telmisartan monotherapy (61.6%). On the other hand, patients on telmisartan + 3 AHDs reported the highest proportion of cardiovascular events (28.6%) and CKD (14.3%). The majority of patients on telmisartan monotherapy were treatment-naïve (92.6%). Grade 1 hypertension was usually more common than other grades across the groups. A majority of the patients in each group were prescribed a 40 mg dose of telmisartan (56.0–67.3%). The average duration between visits 1 and 2 was 99.8 days, 102.0 days, 103.9 days, and 69.2 days for patients on telmisartan monotherapy, telmisartan + 1 AHD, telmisartan + 2 AHDs, and telmisartan + 3 AHDs, respectively (Table 1).

Fig. 1

Patient flowchart. ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, BP blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, SBP systolic blood pressure

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline

Parameter	Telmisartan monotherapy (n = 880)	Telmisartan + 1 AHD (n = 301)	Telmisartan + 2 AHDs (n = 98)	Telmisartan + 3 AHDs (n = 25)
Age (years, mean [SD])	53.2 (12.0)	54.5 (12.5)	56.1 (13.4)	62.9 (10.9)
Female (n [%[)	415 (47.2)	141 (46.8)	47 (48.0)	14 (56.0)
Weight (kg, mean [SD])a	71.2 (14.7)	72.1 (16.4)	68.7 (13.4)	71.7 (13.1)
BMI (kg/m2, mean [SD])b	27.8 (5.0)	28.3 (7.2)	26.1 (3.7)	28.2 (4.1)
Serum creatinine (mg/dL, mean [SD])c	1.3 (0.9)	1.7 (0.5)	2.2 (1.1)	1.8 (0.6)
Comorbidities (n [%])
Diabetes mellitus	542 (61.6)	141 (46.8)	44 (44.9)	11 (44.0)
CV eventsd	35 (6.5)	31 (15.9)	13 (17.6)	6 (28.6)
CKDd	3 (0.6)	8 (4.1)	1 (1.4)	3 (14.3)
Patient type (n [%])
Treatment-naïve	815 (92.6)	0	0	0
Treatment-experienced	65 (7.4)	301 (100)	98 (100)	25 (100)
Hypertension grade (n [%])
Grade 1 SBP	461 (52.4)	150 (49.8)	48 (49.0)	8 (32.0)
Grade 1 DBP	574 (65.2)	198 (65.8)	62 (63.3)	21 (84.0)
Grade 2 SBP	350 (39.8)	123 (40.9)	42 (42.9)	14 (56.0)
Grade 2 DBP	275 (31.3)	86 (28.6)	31 (31.6)	0 (0.0)
Grade 3 SBP	69 (7.8)	28 (9.3)	8 (8.2)	3 (12.0)
Grade 3 DBP	31 (3.5)	17 (5.6)	5 (5.1)	1 (4.0)
Telmisartan dose strength (n [%])
20 mg	282 (32.0)	89 (29.6)	21 (21.4)	6 (24.0)
40 mg	577 (65.6)	200 (66.4)	66 (67.3)	14 (56.0)
80 mg	21 (2.4)	12 (4.0)	11 (11.2)	5 (20.0)
Physician type (n [%])
Consulting physician	424 (48.2)	137 (45.5)	38 (38.8)	10 (40.0)
Cardiologist	94 (10.7)	83 (27.6)	32 (32.7)	9 (36.0)
Diabetologist	226 (25.7)	58 (19.3)	17 (17.3)	2 (8.0)
Endocrinologist	117 (13.3)	19 (6.3)	5 (5.1)	0
General physician	16 (1.8)	1 (0.3)	2 (2.0)	0
Nephrologist	3 (0.3)	3 (1.0)	4 (4.1)	4 (16.0)

AHD antihypertensive drug, BMI body mass index, CKD chronic kidney disease, CV cardiovascular, DBP diastolic blood pressure, SBP systolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation

aThe sample sizes for weight assessment were: telmisartan monotherapy (n = 494), telmisartan + 1 AHD (n = 167), telmisartan + 2 AHDs (n = 52), and telmisartan + 3 AHDs (n = 13)

bThe sample sizes for BMI assessment were: telmisartan monotherapy (n = 272), telmisartan + 1 AHD (n = 66), telmisartan + 2 AHDs (n = 20), and telmisartan + 3 AHDs (n = 8)

cThe sample sizes for serum creatinine assessment were: telmisartan monotherapy (n = 19), telmisartan + 1 AHD (n = 15), telmisartan + 2 AHDs (n  =  8), and telmisartan + 3 AHDs (n = 3)

dThe sample sizes for assessment of number of patients with CV events and CKD is different from the sample size of the group, as a limited number of patients had the diagnosis mentioned in the diagnosis field. Hence, the sample sizes were: telmisartan monotherapy (n = 542), telmisartan + 1 AHD (n = 195), telmisartan + 2 AHDs (n = 74), and telmisartan + 3 AHDs (n = 21). CV events comprise coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke

Primary endpoint

All the treatment regimens reduced SBP and DBP in the overall cohort (Table 2). The greatest change in SBP and DBP was observed in patients on telmisartan monotherapy (mean [95% CI] −13.3 [−14.6, −12.0] mmHg; P < 0.001) and telmisartan + 3 AHDs (−8.8 [−12.5, −5.1] mmHg; P < 0.01), respectively (Fig. 2).

Table 2

Effect of telmisartan on blood pressure

Parameter	Telmisartan monotherapy (n = 880)	Telmisartan + 1 AHD (n = 301)	Telmisartan + 2 AHDs (n = 98)	Telmisartan + 3 AHDs (n = 25)
SBP (mmHg, mean [SD])
Visit 1	156.6 (13.2)	157.0 (13.8)	157.0 (13.4)	162.6 (16.1)
Visit 2	143.2 (20.0)	146.2 (19.9)	146.9 (21.7)	150.6 (22.2)
P value	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.005	0.348
DBP (mmHg, mean [SD])
Visit 1	94.8 (6.0)	94.8 (6.3)	94.9 (6.1)	92.9 (5.1)
Visit 2	87.5 (10.0)	88.3 (10.2)	87.5 (10.3)	84.1 (8.4)
P value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.003

Visit 2 readings were statistically compared against visit 1 readings

AHD antihypertensive drug, DBP diastolic blood pressure, SBP systolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation

Fig. 2

Telmisartan-induced change in blood pressure. Mean (95% confidence interval) change in blood pressure from visit 1 to visit 2 is shown. The error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. Visit 2 readings were statistically compared against visit 1 readings. **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. AHD antihypertensive drug, DBP diastolic blood pressure, SBP systolic blood pressure, TELM telmisartan

Among patients with essential hypertension and comorbid diabetes, the greatest change in SBP (mean [95% CI] −13.3 [−15.0, −11.6] mmHg; P < 0.001) and DBP (−7.3 [−8.2, −6.5] mmHg; P < 0.001) was observed in patients on telmisartan monotherapy. Among patients with essential hypertension and comorbid dyslipidemia, the greatest change in SBP (mean [95% CI] −12.5 [−14.9, −10.1] mmHg; P < 0.001) and DBP (−8.8 [−11.3, −6.3] mmHg; P < 0.001) was observed in patients on telmisartan monotherapy and telmisartan + 2 AHDs, respectively. As only a few patients with comorbid CKD or CAD were present in each therapeutic group, we have presented the overall results instead of group-wise data. Among patients with essential hypertension and CKD (n = 15), telmisartan initiation reduced mean (SD) SBP from 158.8 (12.6) to 156.2 (21.1) mmHg (mean [95% CI] change in SBP −2.6 [– 13.0, 7.8] mmHg) and mean (SD) DBP from 94.0 (5.9) to 90.3 (7.6) mmHg (mean [95% CI] change in DBP −3.6 [– 8.7, 1.5] mmHg). Among patients with essential hypertension and CAD (n = 55), telmisartan initiation reduced mean (SD) SBP from 163.3 (15.5) to 143.3 (19.1) mmHg (mean [95% CI] change in SBP −20.0 [– 25.5, −14.5] mmHg) and mean (SD) DBP from 94.5 (6.0) to 84.1 (9.9) mmHg (mean [95% CI] change in DBP −10.4 [−13.1, −7.7] mmHg) (Table 3). Data for patients with stroke were minimal and hence are not presented.

Table 3

Effect of telmisartan on blood pressure—subgroup analysis according to comorbid conditions

Patients with hypertension and diabetes	Telmisartan monotherapy (n = 542)	Telmisartan + 1 AHD (n = 141)	Telmisartan + 2 AHDs (n = 44)	Telmisartan + 3 AHDs (n = 11)
SBP (mmHg, mean [SD])
Visit 1	156.5 (13.0)	159.3 (15.1)	159.6 (15.1)	169.5 (20.0)
Visit 2	143.1 (19.6)	146.3 (19.6)	152.0 (19.7)	159.9 (18.5)
Change from visit 1 (mean [95% CI])	−13.3 (−15.0, −11.6)	−13.0 (−16.5, −9.5)	−7.5 (−13.6, −1.4)	−9.6 (−20.8, 1.6)
P value	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.503	1.0
DBP (mmHg, mean [SD])
Visit 1	94.6 (5.9)	94.9 (6.8)	93.0 (5.6)	93.0 (6.1)
Visit 2	87.3 (9.5)	87.9 (10.8)	87.5 (10.9)	86.6 (6.0)
Change from visit 1 (mean [95% CI])	−7.3 (−8.2, −6.5)	−6.9 (−8.7, −5.1)	−5.4 (−8.8, −2.0)	−6.4 (−11.2, −1.6)
P value	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.165	0.380

Visit 2 readings were statistically compared against visit 1 readings

AHD antihypertensive drug, DBP diastolic blood pressure, SBP systolic blood pressure, SD standard deviation

Patients were classified according to age into three subgroups: ≤ 45 years, < 65 years, and ≥ 65 years. In the ≤ 45 years subgroup, the greatest statistically significant change in SBP (mean [95% CI] −12.7 [−15.1, −10.3] mmHg; P < 0.001) and DBP (−7.0 [−8.5, −5.5] mmHg) was observed in patients on telmisartan monotherapy. In the < 65 years subgroup, the greatest change in SBP (mean [95% CI] −12.7 [−17.6, −7.8] mmHg; P < 0.001) and DBP (−8.4 [−11.1, −5.7] mmHg; P < 0.001) was observed in patients on telmisartan + 2 AHDs. In the ≥ 65 years subgroup, the greatest change in SBP (mean [95% CI] −16.2 [−19.4, −13.0] mmHg; P < 0.001) and DBP (−12.2 [−16.9, −7.5] mmHg; P < 0.001) was observed in patients on telmisartan monotherapy and telmisartan + 3 AHDs, respectively (Online Resource 1).

Among male patients with essential hypertension, the greatest change in SBP (mean [95% CI] −12.5 [−14.3, −10.7] mmHg; P < 0.001) and DBP (−7.4 [−10.2, −4.6] mmHg; P < 0.001) was observed in patients on telmisartan monotherapy and telmisartan + 2 AHDs, respectively. Similarly, among female patients with essential hypertension, the greatest statistically significant change in SBP (mean [95% CI] −14.2 [−16.2, −12.2] mmHg; P < 0.001) and DBP (−7.4 [−10.8, −4.0] mmHg; P < 0.05) was observed in patients on telmisartan monotherapy and telmisartan + 2 AHDs, respectively (Online Resource 1).

Secondary Endpoint

Overall, 35.5% and 47.8% of the patients achieved their SBP and DBP goals, respectively, according to the ESC/ESH 2018 guidelines. Group-wise, the highest proportion of patients who achieved their SBP goals were on telmisartan monotherapy and telmisartan + 1 AHD (both 35.9%) and the highest proportion of DBP goal achievers were on telmisartan + 3 AHDs (56.0%), respectively (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

Proportion of patients with essential hypertension who achieved individualized blood pressure goals after therapy with telmisartan according to ESC/ESH 2018 guidelines. SBP target was < 140 mmHg and DBP target was < 90 mmHg. AHD antihypertensive drug, DBP diastolic blood pressure, ESC/ESH European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension, SBP systolic blood pressure

Among patients with comorbid diabetes, 30.5% achieved their SBP goal and 40.4% achieved their DBP goal according to the ESC/ESH 2018 guidelines. Group-wise, patients on telmisartan + 1 AHD were most successful in achieving the SBP goal (31.9%), and patients on telmisartan + 2 AHDs were most successful in achieving the DBP goal (50.0%) (Fig. 4). Among patients with comorbid dyslipidemia, 35.2% achieved their SBP goal and 53.5% achieved their DBP goal. Group-wise, patients on telmisartan + 1 AHD were most successful in achieving the SBP goal (39.7%), and patients on telmisartan + 2 AHDs were most successful in achieving the DBP goal (59.2%) (Fig. 5). As only a few patients with comorbid CKD or CAD were present in each therapeutic group, we have presented the overall results instead of group-wise data. Among patients with comorbid CKD, 13.3% of the patients achieved the SBP goal and 40.0% of the patients achieved the DBP goal; among patients with comorbid CAD, 43.6% of the patients achieved the SBP goal and 61.8% of the patients achieved the DBP goal according to the ESC/ESH 2018 guidelines. Data for patients with comorbid stroke were minimal and hence are not presented.

Fig. 4

Proportion of patients with essential hypertension and diabetes who achieved individualized blood pressure goals after therapy with telmisartan according to ESC/ESH 2018 guidelines. SBP target was ≤ 130 mmHg and DBP target was ≤ 80 mmHg. AHD antihypertensive drug, DBP diastolic blood pressure, ESC/ESH European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension, SBP systolic blood pressure

Fig. 5

Proportion of patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia who achieved individualized blood pressure goals after therapy with telmisartan. SBP target was < 140 mmHg and DBP target was < 90 mmHg. AHD antihypertensive drug, DBP diastolic blood pressure, SBP systolic blood pressure

In patients aged ≤ 45 years, patients on telmisartan + 3 AHDs were most successful in achieving the SBP goal (50.0%), while patients on telmisartan + 2 AHDs and telmisartan + 3 AHDs were most successful in achieving the DBP goal (both 50.0%). In patients aged ≥ 65 years, the highest proportion of patients achieving SBP goals was observed in the telmisartan + 1 AHD group (36.9%), and the highest proportion of DBP goal achievers was observed in the telmisartan + 3 AHDs group (27.3%) (Online Resource 2).

Discussion

Telmisartan has been reported to have high affinity for angiotensin II type 1 receptor [22], high lipophilicity and tissue distribution [22], and a long half-life (24 h) [23], thus providing long-lasting antihypertensive effects. Commonly observed side effects include headache, dizziness, malaise/fatigue, cough, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, bronchitis, tachycardia, and sleep disorders [24, 25].

The current study is one of the first in India to evaluate the effectiveness of an AHD using EMR data. The study provides updated evidence regarding the effectiveness of telmisartan among Indian patients with essential hypertension in a real-world setting. The major advantages of the current study compared with previous studies within India are its large sample size and coverage of physicians throughout the nation, thus increasing generalizability. In the current study, the majority of patients with hypertension (90.6%) were prescribed telmisartan as monotherapy or in combination with one additional AHD. However, the current study did not analyze specific AHDs or classes that were prescribed in combination with telmisartan. Usage of telmisartan as mono- or add-on therapy decreased overall mean SBP and DBP by 11.6 mmHg and 7.5 mmHg, respectively. As the availability of studies that used electronic medical records or databases to evaluate the effectiveness of telmisartan in patients with hypertension were limited, we could not compare the current study’s results with others.

The 2019 IGH-IV guidelines recommend telmisartan as one of the drugs of choice to treat hypertension in patients with comorbid diabetes and metabolic syndrome [10]. This recommendation is supported by previous evidence of the efficacy and safety of telmisartan in these populations. Multiple studies have reported that telmisartan monotherapy or in combination with other AHDs significantly reduces and normalizes BP in adults with hypertension and comorbid diabetes and/or metabolic syndrome [26-29]. Moreover, a recent meta-analysis reported that telmisartan was superior to other ARBs in improving insulin resistance and reducing fasting blood glucose and insulin levels [30], probably due to the pleiotropic effects of telmisartan on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ [31]. Other benefits of usage of telmisartan as mono- or combination therapy include improvement of lipid levels [27, 29], visceral fat reduction [32], and improvement in proteinuria/albuminuria or prevention of progression of proteinuria/albuminuria [33]. The aforementioned studies suggest that telmisartan is a good candidate for managing hypertension in patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, or renal disease.

Limitations

The retrospective design of the study is a major limitation. Second, the sample size in a few subgroups was quite small due to the stringent inclusion criteria. However, larger sample sizes can be incorporated in future studies to validate the findings obtained in the current study. BP was measured at various centers using different methods instead of a uniform protocol, which may have caused variation in the measurements. Unlike clinical trials, wherein drug administration is conducted under medical supervision, patients were responsible for administering the prescribed medication themselves at the specified time. Therefore, it is possible that a few patients may have not adhered to the given prescription, resulting in a low therapeutic effect. Also, it is possible that the effect of telmisartan on some parameters were not evident due to the short duration between visits 1 and 2 (≥ 30 days). In the combination groups (i.e. telmisartan + other AHDs), the use of different AHDs may have differing effects on BP reduction. However, we did not perform matching across these groups to adjust for this effect. Finally, as the objective was to evaluate only the effectiveness of telmisartan, we did not assess the safety and tolerability of telmisartan in the study. Also, the EMR database does not capture adverse events or clinical outcomes such as mortality, hospitalization, and cardiovascular outcomes.

Conclusion

This study is one of the first EMR-based studies conducted in India that reports the effectiveness of telmisartan, either as monotherapy or in combination with other AHDs, in reducing SBP and DBP in Indian patients with essential hypertension. We observed that telmisartan prescribed as mono- or add-on therapy during routine clinical practice significantly reduced blood pressure in Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension and comorbid diabetes or dyslipidemia as well. These results suggest that telmisartan may be a good candidate for controlling BP in Indian patients with essential hypertension and comorbidities.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 539 kb)

We evaluated the effectiveness of telmisartan prescribed to Indian patients with hypertension during routine clinical practice in India.

Telmisartan was found to be effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension and comorbid diabetes or dyslipidemia during routine clinical practice in India.