Literature DB >> 3382932

A linguistic deficit resulting from right-hemisphere damage.

E I Schneiderman1, J D Saddy.   

Abstract

The ability of right-brain-damaged (RBD) subjects to correctly insert a word into a well-formed stimulus sentence was tested. Subjects also performed three evaluative tasks designed to establish their degree of general cognitive impairment. The performance of RBD subjects on these tasks was compared to that of left-brain-damaged (LBD) and non-brain-damaged (NBD) subjects. Although RBD subjects outperformed LBD subjects on the language-related evaluative tasks, the RBD group was significantly more impaired on a subset of the insertion task. This subset included items which required reassignment of the syntactic status of elements in the stimulus sentence in order for the insertion to be carried out. The results of this study permit refinement of the common characterization of RBD individuals as rigid in their interpretation of meaning and indicate right-hemisphere involvement in aspects of the grammar previously thought to be inaccessible to it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3382932     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90123-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory.

Authors:  C J Fiebach; M Schlesewsky; G Lohmann; D Y von Cramon; A D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Age-related shifts in hemispheric dominance for syntactic processing.

Authors:  Michelle Leckey; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  It's All in the Family: Brain Asymmetry and Syntactic Processing of Word Class.

Authors:  Chia-lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-05-11

4.  Grammatical number agreement processing using the visual half-field paradigm: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Laura Kemmer; Seana Coulson; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Hemispheric differences in the organization of memory for text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.