Merylin Monaro1, Chema Baydal Bertomeu2, Francesca Zecchinato3, Valentina Fietta3, Giuseppe Sartori3, Helios De Rosario Martínez2,4. 1. Department of General Psychology, Università degli Studi di Padova, via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy. merylin.monaro@unipd.it. 2. Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia, Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Ed. 9C. Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain. 3. Department of General Psychology, Università degli Studi di Padova, via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy. 4. CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales Y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Zaragoza, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present review is intended to provide an up-to-date overview of the strategies available to detect malingered symptoms following whiplash. Whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) represent the most common traffic injuries, having a major impact on economic and healthcare systems worldwide. Heterogeneous symptoms that may arise following whiplash injuries are difficult to objectify and are normally determined based on self-reported complaints. These elements, together with the litigation context, make fraudulent claims particularly likely. Crucially, at present, there is no clear evidence of the instruments available to detect malingered WADs. METHODS: We conducted a targeted literature review of the methodologies adopted to detect malingered WADs. Relevant studies were identified via Medline (PubMed) and Scopus databases published up to September 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-two methodologies are included in the review, grouped into biomechanical techniques, clinical tools applied to forensic settings, and cognitive-based lie detection techniques. Strengths and weaknesses of each methodology are presented, and future directions are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the variety of techniques that have been developed to identify malingering in forensic contexts, the present work highlights the current lack of rigorous methodologies for the assessment of WADs that take into account both the heterogeneous nature of the syndrome and the possibility of malingering. We conclude that it is pivotal to promote awareness about the presence of malingering in whiplash cases and highlight the need for novel, high-quality research in this field, with the potential to contribute to the development of standardised procedures for the evaluation of WADs and the detection of malingering.
OBJECTIVE: The present review is intended to provide an up-to-date overview of the strategies available to detect malingered symptoms following whiplash. Whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) represent the most common traffic injuries, having a major impact on economic and healthcare systems worldwide. Heterogeneous symptoms that may arise following whiplash injuries are difficult to objectify and are normally determined based on self-reported complaints. These elements, together with the litigation context, make fraudulent claims particularly likely. Crucially, at present, there is no clear evidence of the instruments available to detect malingered WADs. METHODS: We conducted a targeted literature review of the methodologies adopted to detect malingered WADs. Relevant studies were identified via Medline (PubMed) and Scopus databases published up to September 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-two methodologies are included in the review, grouped into biomechanical techniques, clinical tools applied to forensic settings, and cognitive-based lie detection techniques. Strengths and weaknesses of each methodology are presented, and future directions are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the variety of techniques that have been developed to identify malingering in forensic contexts, the present work highlights the current lack of rigorous methodologies for the assessment of WADs that take into account both the heterogeneous nature of the syndrome and the possibility of malingering. We conclude that it is pivotal to promote awareness about the presence of malingering in whiplash cases and highlight the need for novel, high-quality research in this field, with the potential to contribute to the development of standardised procedures for the evaluation of WADs and the detection of malingering.
Authors: S D Ferrara; V Ananian; E Baccino; P Banczerowski; D Bordignon; R Boscolo-Berto; R Domenici; J Gorriz Quevedo; M Graw; W Hell; C Hernandez Cueto; P J T Knudsen; S Masiero; M Montisci; G A Norelli; V Pinchi; R Raudys; J S Raul; V Sterzik; E Tessitore; J Tuusov; P Vanezis; Y Vermylen; D N Vieira; G Viel; A Viero; E Villanueva; R Zoia Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 2.686