| Literature DB >> 33829256 |
Michael Wierer1, Julia Werner2, Jana Wobst2,3, Adnan Kastrati2,3, Ganildo Cepele2, Redouane Aherrahrou4, Hendrik B Sager2,3, Jeanette Erdmann5,6, Martin Dichgans7, Veit Flockerzi8, Mete Civelek4, Alexander Dietrich9, Matthias Mann1, Heribert Schunkert2,3, Thorsten Kessler2,3.
Abstract
AIMS: In-stent restenosis is a complication after coronary stenting associated with morbidity and mortality. Here, we sought to investigate the molecular processes underlying neointima formation and to identify new treatment and prevention targets. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Genetics; Proteomics; Restenosis; Vascular remodelling
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33829256 PMCID: PMC8104955 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J ISSN: 0195-668X Impact factor: 29.983
Figure 2Pathway analysis of regulated proteins at each timepoint. (A, B) Unpaired Student’s t-test results of injured vs. sham-treated femoral arteries at three (A) and 14 days (B) after vessel injury. Blue dots indicate significantly regulated proteins (false discovery rate <0.01, s0 = 1). (C, D) Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis (Fisher’s exact test) of significantly regulated proteins. Colours of the dots correspond to the P-values, size represents fraction of regulated proteins of the GO set (C), or fraction of annotated proteins of regulated proteins (D). d, day(s); FDR, false discovery rate.
Figure 3Time-resolved analysis of extracellular matrix remodelling upon vessel injury. () Analysis of variance significantly regulated proteins that are also annotated as core extracellular matrix proteins.17,18 Heatmap represents z-scored average protein intensities. (B–D) Protein intensities of selected core matrisomal (B, C), or matrisome-associated (D) proteins. P-values were derived from unpaired Student’s t-test statistics. d, day(s); LFQ, label-free quantitation.
Figure 4Regulation of proteins involved in cell migration during neointima formation. (A) Volcano plot with Student’s t-test analysis as in with significantly regulated proteins annotated for the GOBP terms ‘migration’ or ‘regulation of migration’ marked in dark blue. (B) Correlation of average protein fold differences between injured and sham-treated femoral arteries at Day 3 vs. Day 14. Proteins significantly regulated at either Day 3 or Day 14 are marked in pale blue, proteins annotated for migration terms in dark blue as in (A). (C, D) Protein intensities of selected proteins involved in cell migration. Unpaired Student’s t-test. Proteins depicted in (D) were exclusively detected under injury conditions. d, day(s); FDR, false discovery rate; GOBP, gene ontology biological process; inj, injured; LFQ, label-free quantitation; NI, not injured.
Figure 7Effect of TRPC6 genotype on smooth muscle cell migration and restenosis. (A) Location of rs2513192 at the TRPC6 locus. (B) Association of the single nucleotide polymorphism rs2513192 with TRPC6 expression (https://gtexportal.org/home/, accessed on 13 November 2018).35 (C) Association of rs2513192 genotype with human aortic smooth muscle cell proliferation after stimulation with platelet-derived growth factor in n = 149 donors from the Systems Genetics Resource at the University of California, Los Angeles (https://systems.genetics.ucla.edu/). (D) Measurement of restenosis by angiographic follow-up. (E, F) Risk of restenosis after coronary stenting in homozygous AA lesions (E) and patients (F) compared with GG or AG lesions/patients (χ2 test). Data are in per cent. chr, chromosome; kb, kilobases.