Literature DB >> 33828793

You read best what you read most: An eye tracking study.

Uroš Nedeljković1, Kata Jovančić1, Nace Pušnik2.   

Abstract

At the threshold of the digital era, Zuzana Licko was of the opinion that familiar letterforms owe legibility to centuries-long exposure and that all new, prototypically unmatching forms would be equally legible if used as frequently. This paper examined the legibility in the context of familiarity - is it affected by the time of exposure to a particular typeface or a typeface's universal structure. We ran repeated measures tests with exposure period in-between. The experiment was conducted using for this purpose designed typefaces as stimuli, and the eye-tracking on-screen reading technology. The results confirmed that one's familiarity with a typeface influences one's reading speed. The universal letter structure, recognised by Frutiger as the prototype skeleton, is the constant that a priori provides legibility. On the other hand, the period of exposure to uncommon letterforms also has a positive impact on legibility. Therefore, considering that the period of familiarity with the humanist letterforms has been continuous since their establishment, the maxim from the dawn of the digital era can be regarded as valid.

Entities:  

Keywords:  art perception; eye tracking; familiarity; font tuning effect; reading; region of interest; typography

Year:  2020        PMID: 33828793      PMCID: PMC7963459          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.13.2.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  14 in total

Review 1.  Letter processing and font information during reading: beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design.

Authors:  Thomas Sanocki; Mary C Dyson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Font tuning associated with expertise in letter perception.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Alan C N Wong; William G Hayward; Olivia S Cheung
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Features for identification of uppercase and lowercase letters.

Authors:  Daniel Fiset; Caroline Blais; Catherine Ethier-Majcher; Martin Arguin; Daniel Bub; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

4.  Personal values as selective factors in perception.

Authors:  L POSTMAN; J S BRUNER; E McGINNIES
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1948-04

5.  The interaction of need, set, and stimulus-structure in a cognitive task.

Authors:  L POSTMAN; R S CRUTCHFIELD
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1952-04

6.  Readability of mixed type forms.

Authors:  M A TINKER; D G PATERSON
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1946-12

7.  Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: font-specific, schematic tuning.

Authors:  T Sanocki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Size, style, and vertical spacing in the legibility of small typefaces.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1972-04

9.  Letter differentiation and rate of comprehension in reading.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1965-10

10.  Size and case of type as stimuli in reading.

Authors:  A I Rudnicky; P A Kolers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.