Literature DB >> 33828704

The impact of text segmentation on subtitle reading.

Olivia Gerber-Morón1, Agnieszka Szarkowska, Bencie Woll2.   

Abstract

Understanding the way people watch subtitled films has become a central concern for subtitling researchers in recent years. Both subtitling scholars and professionals generally believe that in order to reduce cognitive load and enhance readability, line breaks in twoline subtitles should follow syntactic units. However, previous research has been inconclusive as to whether syntactic-based segmentation facilitates comprehension and reduces cognitive load. In this study, we assessed the impact of text segmentation on subtitle processing among different groups of viewers: hearing people with different mother tongues (English, Polish, and Spanish) and deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing people with English as a first language. We measured three indicators of cognitive load (difficulty, effort, and frustration) as well as comprehension and eye tracking variables. Participants watched two video excerpts with syntactically and non-syntactically segmented subtitles. The aim was to determine whether syntactic-based text segmentation as well as the viewers' linguistic background influence subtitle processing. Our findings show that non-syntactically segmented subtitles induced higher cognitive load, but they did not adversely affect comprehension. The results are discussed in the context of cognitive load, audiovisual translation, and deafness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audiovisual translation; cognitive load; eye movement; line breaks; media accessibility; reading; region of interest; revisits; segmentation; subtitling

Year:  2018        PMID: 33828704      PMCID: PMC7901653          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.11.4.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  14 in total

1.  Eye movement patterns of captioned television viewers.

Authors:  C J Jensema; S el Sharkawy; R S Danturthi; R Burch; D Hsu
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  2000-07

2.  Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging.

Authors:  Pascal W M Van Gerven; Fred Paas; Jeroen J G Van Merriënboer; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel I Mayberry; Alex A del Giudice; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-11-11

4.  Reading Function and Content Words in Subtitled Videos.

Authors:  Izabela Krejtz; Agnieszka Szarkowska; Maria Łogińska
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-16

5.  The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Henrike K Blumenfeld; Margarita Kaushanskaya
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The effects of captions on deaf students' content comprehension, cognitive load, and motivation in online learning.

Authors:  Joong-O Yoon; Minjeong Kim
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  2011

8.  Viewer reaction to different television captioning speeds.

Authors:  C Jensema
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1998-10

9.  How Do Children Who Can't Hear Learn to Read an Alphabetic Script? A Review of the Literature on Reading and Deafness.

Authors:  C Musselman
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2000

10.  Subjective cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis depends on task length.

Authors:  Joshua Sandry; Helen M Genova; Ekaterina Dobryakova; John DeLuca; Glenn Wylie
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.