Literature DB >> 33828692

The rhythm of cognition - Effects of an auditory beat on oculomotor control in reading and sequential scanning.

Elke B Lange1, Aleks Pieczykolan2, Hans A Trukenbrod3, Lynn Huestegge2.   

Abstract

Eye-movement behavior is inherently rhythmic. Even without cognitive input, the eyes never rest, as saccades are generated 3 to 4 times per second. Based on an embodied view of cognition, we asked whether mental processing in visual cognitive tasks is also rhythmic in nature by studying the effects of an external auditory beat (rhythmic background music) on saccade generation in exemplary cognitive tasks (reading and sequential scanning). While in applied settings background music has been demonstrated to impair reading comprehension, the effect of musical tempo on eye-movement control during reading or scanning has not been investigated so far. We implemented a tempo manipulation in four steps as well as a silent baseline condition, while participants completed a text reading or a sequential scanning task that differed from each other in terms of underlying cognitive processing requirements. The results revealed that increased tempo of the musical beat sped up fixations in text reading, while the presence (vs. absence) of the auditory stimulus generally reduced overall reading time. In contrast, sequential scanning was unaffected by the auditory pacemaker. These results were supported by additionally applying Bayesian inference statistics. Our study provides evidence against a cognitive load account (i.e., that spare resources during low-demand sequential scanning allow for enhanced processing of the external beat). Instead, the data suggest an interpretation in favor of a modulation of the oculomotor saccade timer by irrelevant background music in cases involving highly automatized oculomotor control routines (here: in text reading).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reading; background music; visual sequential scanning

Year:  2018        PMID: 33828692      PMCID: PMC7886406          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.11.2.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  46 in total

1.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times.

Authors:  S N Yang; G W McConkie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  When the brain plays music: auditory-motor interactions in music perception and production.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Joyce L Chen; Virginia B Penhune
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Multiple resources and mental workload.

Authors:  Christopher D Wickens
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading.

Authors:  Ralph Radach; Lynn Huestegge; Ronan Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-21

6.  The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception.

Authors:  Niko A Busch; Julien Dubois; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Saccadic Suppression Is Embedded Within Extended Oscillatory Modulation of Sensitivity.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Ready, set, reset: stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Entrainment of neural oscillations as a modifiable substrate of attention.

Authors:  Daniel J Calderone; Peter Lakatos; Pamela D Butler; F Xavier Castellanos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.