| Literature DB >> 33828633 |
Sebastiano Campisi1, Cameron Beevers2, Ali Nasrallah2, C Richard A Catlow2, Carine E Chan-Thaw1, Maela Manzoli3, Nikolaos Dimitratos4, David J Willock2, Alberto Roldan2, Alberto Villa1.
Abstract
A combination of experimental spectroscopies (UV-vis and Fourier-transform infrared) and computational modeling was used to investigate the coordination of small ligands (aminopropanol andEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33828633 PMCID: PMC8016172 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces ISSN: 1932-7447 Impact factor: 4.126
Figure 1Experimental UV–vis spectra of H2PdCl4 in solution at pH 3 (black), computed UV–vis spectra of [PdCl4]2–, [Pd2Cl6]2–, and [PdCl3H2O]−. Inset: Structures of PdCl42–, (A); Pd2Cl62–, (B); and [PdCl3(H2O)]−, (C). Color code: Pd: cyan; Cl: green; O: red; and H: light gray.
Figure 3UV–vis spectra of H2PdCl4 in solution (blue), in the presence of the capping agent AP (green), Pd with AP reduced (black).
Energy Change of Reaction (ΔEr) for the Formation of Pd2Cl62– and [PdCl3H2O]− from PdCl4
| products | Δ |
|---|---|
| Pd2Cl62– | –252 |
| [PdCl3(H2O)]− | –215 |
Figure 2UV–vis spectra of H2PdCl4 in solution (blue) in the presence of the capping agent PD (green), Pd with PD reduced (black).
Figure 4UV–vis spectra of PdCl42– sol in the presence of the capping agent AP (green) and computed TD-DFT spectrum of PdCl3AP (blue dashed). Inset: (A), PdCl3AP– lowest energy geometry; (B), [PdCl3AP]− with the Pd–N localized bonding orbital and the centroids for the Pd–N and Pd–Cl bonds. Color code: Pd: lilac; Cl: green; O: red; N: blue; C: dark gray; H: white; and localized orbital centroids: translucent yellow.
Energy Change of Reaction for the Potential Products of the Reaction between PdCl4 and AP
| potential products | Δ |
|---|---|
| PdCl2OHAP (cis) | –207 |
| PdCl2OHAP (trans) | –188 |
| PdCl3AP | –305 |
| PdCl2AP2 | –295 |
Figure 5(A) FT-IR spectra of PD and Pd–PD (top). (B) FT-IR spectra of AP and Pd–AP (bottom).
Figure 6Optimization of two different conformations of the AP adsorbate in the gas phase: (A) all trans, (B) conformation with internal H-bond.
Vibrational Frequencies and Assignments of the FT-IR Bands
| vibrational frequency (cm–1) | assignment (vibrational mode) |
|---|---|
| 3361 | –OH stretching |
| 2939 and 2924 | –CH symm and asymm stretchings |
| 1656 | –OH bending |
| 1469 | –CH2 bending |
| 1423 | C–O stretching |
| 1379 | C–H bending |
| 3456 | –OH stretching |
| 2949 and 2888 | –CH symm and asymm stretchings |
| 1642 | –OH bending |
| 1473 | –CH2 bending |
| 1405 | C–O stretching |
| 1362 | C–H bending |
| 3483 and 3442 | –NH symm and asymm stretching |
| 3274 | –OH stretching |
| 2924 and 2852 | –CH symm and asymm stretchings |
| 1605 | –OH bending |
| 3360 | –OH stretching |
| 3229 and 3137 | –NH symm and asymm stretching |
| 2933 and 2883 | –CH symm and asymm stretching |
| 1586 | –OH bending |
Adsorption Energies of the Different Configurations of 3-Aminopropan-1-ol on Pd(100) and Pd(111) Surfaces
| configuration | energy of adsorption/kJ mol–1 | N–Pd or O–Pd distance/Å |
|---|---|---|
| Pd(111) surface | ||
| nitrogen binding | –145 | 2.15 |
| oxygen binding | –95 | 2.34 |
| Pd(100) surface | ||
| nitrogen binding (O up) | –127 | 2.16 |
| nitrogen binding (O down) | –149 | 2.15 |
| oxygen binding | –86 | 2.32 |
Figure 7Adsorption of the AP adsorbate on the Pd(111) surface with the nitrogen binding to the surface.
Figure 10Adsorption of the AP adsorbate on Pd(100) with the oxygen binding to the surface.
Figure 11IR spectra for the most stable conformations: (A) nitrogen binding of the aminopropanol on the Pd(100) surface (B) nitrogen binding of the aminopropanol on the Pd(111) surface (C) plots A and B overlaid with the experimentally obtained IR spectrum, (D) oxygen binding on the Pd(111) and Pd(100) surfaces overlaid with the experimentally obtained IR spectrum.