Kelvin Elphick1, William Frost1, Marjan Samiepour1,2, Takahide Kubota3,4, Koki Takanashi3,4,5, Hiroaki Sukegawa6, Seiji Mitani6,7, Atsufumi Hirohata1. 1. Department of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York, UK. 2. Seagate Technology,1 Disc Drive, Springtown Industrial Estate, Londonderry, Northern Ireland. 3. Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. 4. Center for Spintronics Research Network, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. 5. Center for Science and Innovation in Spintronics, Core Research Cluster, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. 6. Research Center for Magnetic and Spintronic Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan. 7. Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Abstract
Heusler alloys are theoretically predicted to become half-metals at room temperature (RT). The advantages of using these alloys are good lattice matching with major substrates, high Curie temperature above RT and intermetallic controllability for spin density of states at the Fermi energy level. The alloys are categorised into half- and full-Heusler alloys depending upon the crystalline structures, each being discussed both experimentally and theoretically. Fundamental properties of ferromagnetic Heusler alloys are described. Both structural and magnetic characterisations on an atomic scale are typically carried out in order to prove the half-metallicity at RT. Atomic ordering in the films is directly observed by X-ray diffraction and is also indirectly probed via the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity. Element specific magnetic moments and spin polarisation of the Heusler alloy films are directly measured using X-ray magnetic circular dichroism and Andreev reflection, respectively. By employing these ferromagnetic alloy films in a spintronic device, efficient spin injection into a non-magnetic material and large magnetoresistance are also discussed. Fundamental properties of antiferromagnetic Heusler alloys are then described. Both structural and magnetic characterisations on an atomic scale are shown. Atomic ordering in the Heusler alloy films is indirectly measured by the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity. Antiferromagnetic configurations are directly imaged by X-ray magnetic linear dichroism and polarised neutron reflection. The applications of the antiferromagnetic Heusler alloy films are also explained. The other non-magnetic Heusler alloys are listed. A brief summary is provided at the end of this review.
Heusler alloys are theoretically predicted to become half-metals at room temperature (RT). The advantages of using these alloys are good lattice matching with major substrates, high Curie temperature above RT and intermetallic controllability for spin density of states at the Fermi energy level. The alloys are categorised into half- and full-Heusler alloys depending upon the crystalline structures, each being discussed both experimentally and theoretically. Fundamental properties of ferromagnetic Heusler alloys are described. Both structural and magnetic characterisations on an atomic scale are typically carried out in order to prove the half-metallicity at RT. Atomic ordering in the films is directly observed by X-ray diffraction and is also indirectly probed via the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity. Element specific magnetic moments and spin polarisation of the Heusler alloy films are directly measured using X-ray magnetic circular dichroism and Andreev reflection, respectively. By employing these ferromagnetic alloy films in a spintronic device, efficient spin injection into a non-magnetic material and large magnetoresistance are also discussed. Fundamental properties of antiferromagnetic Heusler alloys are then described. Both structural and magnetic characterisations on an atomic scale are shown. Atomic ordering in the Heusler alloy films is indirectly measured by the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity. Antiferromagnetic configurations are directly imaged by X-ray magnetic linear dichroism and polarised neutron reflection. The applications of the antiferromagnetic Heusler alloy films are also explained. The other non-magnetic Heusler alloys are listed. A brief summary is provided at the end of this review.
Spintronics has been initiated by the discovery of giant magnetoresistance (GMR) byFert et al. [1] and Grünberg et al. [2] independently. A GMR device consists of a sandwich structure of a ferromagnet (FM)/non-magnet (NM)/FM multilayer, where an external magnetic field can align the FM magnetisations in parallel to achieve a low-resistance state ascompared with a high-resistance state with antiparallel magnetisations without a field application. The first-generation spintronic devices are based on magnetoresistive (MR) junctions, which have been used very widely [3,4], e.g., a read head in a hard disk drive (HDD) [5] and a cell in a magnetic random access memory (MRAM) [6]. The critical measure of efficient magnetic transport in these devices is an MR ratio, which is defined by152170183289359360361367367384382383348349MR ratio = ΔR/R = (RAP – RP)/RP,(1)where RP and RAP represent the resistance measured for parallel and antiparallel configurations of the ferromagnet magnetisations, respectively. The MR ratio determines the signal-to-noise ratio of these devices, which directlycorresponds to the miniaturisation of them. To date, the maximum GMRratio in the current-in-plane (CIP) geometry has been reported to be 65% at 300 K in a [Co (0.8)/Cu (0.83)]60 (thickness in nm) junction [7].Similar MR changes have been demonstrated in a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) by replacing an NM layer with an oxide tunnelling barrier in a GMR junction [8]. Tunnelling magnetoresistance (TMR) at room temperature (RT) has then been achieved by Miyazaki and Tezuka [9] and by Moodera et al. [10] independently. Since then, the TMRratio has been improved veryrapidly to 81% in MTJ consisting of Co0.4Fe0.4B0.2 (3)/Al (0.6)-O/Co0.4Fe0.4B0.2 (2.5) (thickness in nm) at RT [11]. By replacing amorphous AlOx with epitaxialMgO, theoreticians have predicated over 1,000% TMRratios due to coherent tunnelling via the ∆1 band matched at an Fe/MgO interface [12,13]. Here, the TMRratio can be defined as [8]TMRratio = 2P1P2/(1-P1P2), (2)where P1(2) are effective spin polarisation of a ferromagnetic layer 1(2), respectively. For the coherent tunnelling, P1(2) can be 100%, leading to the TMRratio of infinity. Experimentally, giant TMRratios have been reported by Parkin [14] and Yuasa [15] independently. Accordingly, a TMRratio as largeas 604% has been achieved in MTJ consisting of Co0.2Fe0.6B0.2 (6)/MgO (2.1)/Co0.2Fe0.6B0.2 (4) (thickness in nm) at RT [16]. Such a drastic increase in the TMRratio has increased the areal density of HDD byalmost four times over the last decade, for example [3].As shown in Figure 1 for 1 Gbit MRAM, the junction cell diameter (fabrication rule) should be <65 nm with a resistance area product (RA) <30 Ω·µm2 and an MR ratio >100% [18]. For 10 Gbit MRAM, the cell diameter should be reduced to be <20 nm with RA < 3.5 Ω·µm2 and an MR ratio >100%. Here, low RA is required to satisfy the impedance matching [19] and low power consumption (<100 fJ/bit). A standard MRAM architecture commercially employed is one MRAM cell with a transistor attached, where a large MR ratio (>150%) is essential to maintain a signal-to-noise ratio allowing for a read-out signal voltage to be detected by a small-current application. In order to achieve these requirements, the intensive investigation has been carried out on the CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB junctions. In-plane CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB MTJs have successfully satisfied the requirement for 10 Gbit MRAM by achieving RA = 0.9 Ω·µm2 and TMR = 102% at RT [20] as shown as open triangles with a blue fit in Figure 1. For further miniaturisation of the MRAM cells and the corresponding increase in the density, a perpendicularly magnetised MTJ (p-MTJ) has been investigated to achieve the requirement for 1 Gbit MRAM with RA = 18 Ω·µm2 and TMR = 124% at RT [21]. Further improvement has been made to satisfy 10 Gbit MRAM target [22], with satisfying a TMRratio >100% and RA ~ 2 Ω·µm2. These MTJs under development are expected to replace the current-generation 256 Mbit MRAM with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy produced by Everspin [23]. Samsung shipped their new MRAM with a 28-nm fabrication rule for embedded-memory evaluation in March 2019 [24].
Figure 1.
Relationship between a MR ratio and RA of MTJs with CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB (blue triangles), nano-oxide layers (NOL, green squares) and Heusler alloys (red circles) with in-plane (open symbols) and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (closed symbols) together with that of GMR junctions with Heusler alloys (orange rhombus). The target requirements for 2 Tbit/in2 HDD read heads as well as 1 and 10 Gbit MRAM applications are shown as purple and yellow shaded regions, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Hirohata et al. [17]. Copyright 2018. MDPI AG
Relationship between a MR ratio and RA of MTJs with CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB (blue triangles), nano-oxide layers (NOL, green squares) and Heusler alloys (red circles) with in-plane (open symbols) and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (closed symbols) together with that of GMR junctions with Heusler alloys (orange rhombus). The target requirements for 2 Tbit/in2 HDD read heads as well as 1 and 10 Gbit MRAM applications are shown as purple and yellow shaded regions, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Hirohata et al. [17]. Copyright 2018. MDPI AGFor a 2 Tbit/in2 HDD application, on the other hand, MTJ cannot be used as the requirement for RA is almost one order of magnitude smaller than that for 10 Gbit MRAM [25]. One attempt is a nano-oxide layer (NOL) developed by Toshiba, which restricts a current path perpendicular to a GMR stack by oxidising a part of the NM Cu or Al spacer layer [26]. A Co0.5Fe0.5 (2.5)/Al-NOL/Co0.5Fe0.5 (2.5) junction has demonstrated RA = 0.5 ~ 1.5 Ω·µm2 and MR = 7 ~ 10% at RT. These values are below the requirement for the 2 Tbit/in2 HDD, and hence further improvement in these junctions is crucial.For further improvement in the MR junctions to meet the requirements beyond 10 Gbit MRAM and 2 Tbit/in2 HDD, a half-metallic ferromagnet (HMF) needs to be developed to achieve 100% spin polarisation at the Fermi energy level (EF) at RT [27], leading to an infinite MR ratio using Eq. (1). The half-metallicity is induced by the formation of a bandgap δ only in one of the electron-spin bands in density of states (DOS) as schematically shown in Figure 2. There are four major types of HMFs theoretically proposed and experimentally demonstrated to date; (1) oxidecompounds (e.g., rutile CrO2 [28] and spinel Fe3O4 [29]); (2) perovskites (e.g., (La,Sr)MnO3 [30]); and, (3) magnetic semiconductors, including Zinc-blende compounds (e.g., EuO and EuS [31], (Ga,Mn)As [32] and CrAs [33]) and (4) Heusler alloys (e.g., NiMnSb [34]). Among these HMFs, magnetic semiconductors have been reported to show 100% spin polarisation in a film form due to their Zeeman splitting in two spin bands. However, their Curie temperatures (TC) are still below RT [35]. Low-temperature Andreev reflection measurements have confirmed that both rutile CrO2 and perovskite La0.7Sr0.3MnO3compounds possess almost 100% spin polarisation [36]; however, no experimental report has been proved the half-metallicity at RT to date. The Heusler alloys exhibit the half-metallicity at RT in a bulk form but not in an ex situ film form [37-39] but in an in situ film, (93 + 7/–11)% [40]. Therefore, the Heusler alloy films can be the most promising candidate for the RT half-metallicity due to their lattice constant matching with major substrates, high TC and large δ at E in general as detailed in the following sections.
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram of spin DOS for a HMF
Schematic diagram of spin DOS for a HMF
Heusler alloys
In order to employ the Heusler alloy films in spintronic devices, both advantages and disadvantages need to be considered as listed in Figure 3. Both structural and magnetic properties of the Heusler alloys can be controlled by the substitution of constituent elements of the alloyas detailed in the following sections. For example, the total spin magnetic moments, and the corresponding saturation magnetisation, can be preciselycontrolled by atomic substitution. Such controllability is useful for spin injection to minimise a stray field for the applications of an HDD read head, an MRAM cell and a magnetic racetrack memory, for instance. These properties also depend on the crystalline ordering of the Heusler alloys. For the half-metallicity, low damping constants and high Curie temperature, the perfect crystalline ordering needs to be achieved. Any departure from theoretical prediction on these properties can be attributed to disordering of the alloys. These magnetic properties are important for spin injection, accumulation, operation and detection in spintronic devices. Both structural and magnetic properties of the Heusler alloys are also depend on the lattice matching with substrates and seed layers. A low coercivity and large activation volume can be achieved by removing strain induced by lattice mismatch between them. These magnetic properties are again important for spin transport in devices.
Figure 3.
List of advantages and disadvantages of the Heusler-alloy usage in spintronic devices [41]. The width of the links represents the importance. Reprinted with permission from Hirohata et al. [17]. Copyright 2016
List of advantages and disadvantages of the Heusler-alloy usage in spintronic devices [41]. The width of the links represents the importance. Reprinted with permission from Hirohata et al. [17]. Copyright 2016
Crystalline structures
Since the initial discovery of ferromagnetism in a ternaryCu2MnAlalloy, consisting of non-magnetic (NM) elements, by Heusler in 1903 [42], the Heusler alloys have been investigated intensively for various applications, including spintronic devices [37-39,41], magnetic refrigeration [43] and shape memory [44]. The Heusler alloys are categorised into two distinct groups by their crystalline structures; (1) half Heusler alloys with the form of XYZ in the C1 structure and (2) full Heusler alloys with the form of X2YZ in the L21 structure as schematically drawn in Figure 4(a,b), respectively. Here, X and Y atoms are transition metals, while Z is either a semiconductor or an NM metal [see Figure 5] [34,45]. The unit cell of the L21 structure consists of four face-centred cubic (fcc) sublattices, while that of the C1 structure is formed by removing one of the X sites. In the Heusler alloys, the half-metallicity is known to be fragile against atomic disorder. For the L21 structure, when the Y and Z atoms replace their sites (Y-Z disorder) and eventually occupy their sites absolutely at random, the alloy transforms into the B2 structure [see Figure 4(c)]. Similarly, the X-Y disorder occurs to lead to the D03 structure as shown in Figure 4(d). The mixture of X-Y and X-Z disorder forms the B32a structure [see Figure 4(e)]. In addition, X-Y and X-Z disorder finally forms the A2 structure as shown in Figure 4(f).
Figure 4.
Crystalline structures of both (a) half- and (b) full- Heusler alloys; C1 and L21 structures, respectively. Atomically disordered structures, (c) D03, (d) B2, (e) B32a and (f) A2, are also shown. Data taken from Refs. [38,45,46]
Figure 5.
Periodic table showing typical X (blue colour), Y (pink colour) and Z (green colour) elements in Heusler compounds. Data are taken from Refs. [38,45,46]
Crystalline structures of both (a) half- and (b) full- Heusler alloys; C1 and L21 structures, respectively. Atomically disordered structures, (c) D03, (d) B2, (e) B32a and (f) A2, are also shown. Data taken from Refs. [38,45,46]Periodic table showing typical X (blue colour), Y (pink colour) and Z (green colour) elements in Heusler compounds. Data are taken from Refs. [38,45,46]Recent studies propose the other classes of Heusler-alloy family, such as inverse [47,48] and equiatomic quaternaryHeusler alloys [49,50]. The form of inverse Heusler alloys can be described as XYXZ for which one of X atom in the L21 structure replaces with Y atom. Similarly, the form of equiatomic quaternary Heusler alloy can be described as XX’YZ for which one of X atom in the L21 structure changes to the 4th element, X’. Interestingly, some of inverse Heusler alloys and equiatomic quaternaryHeusler alloysalso exhibit half-metallic electronic structure as well as electronic structure of spin gapless semiconductor (see Section 9.2).Due to the complicated crystalline structures of the Heusler alloysas described above, they require very high temperature (typically >1000 K in the bulk form and >650 K in the thin-film form) for their crystalline ordering as shown in Figure 6 [51]. This fact hinders the use of Heusler alloy films to be used in spintronic devices. Recently, layer-by-layer crystallisation has been reported along the Heusler alloy (110) plane to reduce the crystallisation energy, resulting in the annealing temperature, by over 50% [52]. A similar crystallisation process has been demonstrated at a higher temperature to uniformlycrystallise the Heusler alloy films [53]. Further reduction has been achieved using a W(110) seed layer, allowing over 80% B2 ordering by annealing at 355 K for 2 min [54]. Such layer-by-layer crystallisation can open a way for the implementation of a Heusler alloy film into spintronic devices.
Figure 6.
Crystalline ordering temperature of full-Heusler bulk alloys with respect to the element X. Experimental data are taken from Refs. [37,55,56]
Crystalline ordering temperature of full-Heusler bulk alloys with respect to the element X. Experimental data are taken from Refs. [37,55,56]Most of crystallised Heusler alloys possess their lattice constants within the range of those of major substrates, clearly indicating the possibilities of epitaxial growth. Co-based full Heusler alloys especially hold excellent match with both GaAs(001) and MgO(001) substrates. The lattice constant can be precisely engineered to a required value by substituting a constituent element of the Heusler alloy X with a different atom as indicated as lines in Figure 7, and also by substituting the other elements Y or Z with the other atoms as categorised in Figure 7 with retaining the element X (e.g., Co2(Cr,Fe)Al). Such a crystallographical engineering approach is a powerful method to control the spin DOS in a unit cell to achieve robust half-metallicity at RT.
Figure 7.
Lattice constant distribution of both (a) half- and (b) full-Heusler bulk alloys with respect to the element X. Experimental data are used from Refs. [41,45,57,58] and calculated data are taken from Refs. [59,60,61]. Lattice constants of major substrates are also shown as references
Lattice constant distribution of both (a) half- and (b) full-Heusler bulk alloys with respect to the element X. Experimental data are used from Refs. [41,45,57,58] and calculated data are taken from Refs. [59,60,61]. Lattice constants of major substrates are also shown as references
Magnetic properties
The Curie temperature TC of the Heusler alloys falls typically within the range between 200 and 1200 K as shown in Figure 8. TC can also be further tuned to be well above RT by the atomic substitution as described in the previous section, achieving required spontaneous magnetisation at RT for the applications.
Figure 8.
Curie temperature distribution of both (a) half- and (b) full-Heusler bulk alloys with respect to the element X. Experimental data are used from Refs. [41,45,57,58,61,62,66.] and calculated data are taken from Refs. [63–64]
Curie temperature distribution of both (a) half- and (b) full-Heusler bulk alloys with respect to the element X. Experimental data are used from Refs. [41,45,57,58,61,62,66.] and calculated data are taken from Refs. [63-64]The robustness of the half-metallicity depends on the size and definition of the bandgap δ formed in one electron-spin band in the vicinity of Fermi energy level EF. δ is formed by the strong d-band hybridisation between the two transition metals of X and Y, according to ab initio calculations [67]. Typically, δ of 0.4 ~ 0.8 eV is expected to be formed at 0 K [38]. At a finite temperature, however, the bandgap becomes smaller and the edge definition of δ becomes broader. δ has been measured by detecting photon absorption of circularly polarised infrared light with energycorresponding to δ [64,68].The origin of δ in the Heusler alloys is attributed to the strong d-band hybridisation of the two elements X and Y. According to the calculations by Galanakis et al. [69], the local DOS in the vicinity of E is dominated by the d-states, forming an energygap between the higher degenerate of bonding hybridised states in the valence band and the lower degenerate of antibonding states in the conduction band. For the half-Heusler alloys [Figure 9(a)], the gap is formed between the hybridised states of the elements X and Y, i.e., between the three-fold degenerate (t2) in the bonding states and the two-fold degenerate (e) in the antibonding states. Therefore, most of the half-Heusler alloys possess an indirect bandgap between the valence band minimum at the Γ point and the conduction maximum at the X point. For the full Heusler alloys, on the other hand, the d-band hybridisation between the elements X plays a very important role, although these atoms occupy the second-nearest neighbour sites [see Figure 4(b)]. As shown in Figure 9(b), the X–X hybridisation initially forms both bonding and antibonding states for both t2 and e. The two bonding states among these four X–X orbitals then hybridise with the Y degenerates, developing both bonding and antibonding degenerates with a very largegap in between. The two X–X antibonding states, however, cannot couple with the Y degenerates, maintaining the small gap across EF, which defines the bandgap for the full-Heusler alloys. This can provide either a direct bandgap at the Γ point or an indirect bandgap between the Γ and X points.
Figure 9.
Schematic illustrations of the origin of the minority bandgap in (a) half- and (b) full-Heusler alloys (NiMnZ and Co2MnZ as examples, respectively). d1, d2, d3, d4 and d5 represent d2 and d22 orbitals, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Galanakis et al. [69]. Copyright 2006. The Institute of Physics Publishing
Schematic illustrations of the origin of the minority bandgap in (a) half- and (b) full-Heusler alloys (NiMnZ and Co2MnZas examples, respectively). d1, d2, d3, d4 and d5 represent d2 and d22 orbitals, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Galanakis et al. [69]. Copyright 2006. The Institute of Physics PublishingIn the Heusler alloys, total spin magnetic moments per formula unit (f.u.) Mt have been reported to follow the generalised Slater-Pauling curve by Galanakis et al., which is represented as M = Z – 18 (half-Heusler) and Z – 24 (full-Heusler), where Z is the total number of valence band electrons as shown in Figure 10 [67,69]. This behaviour enables us to preferentiallycontrol the magnetic properties, the spin DOS at EF in particular, continuously by substituting the Y atoms with the other transition metals as listed in Figure 5. Even though there are almost 3,000 possible combinations to form ternaryHeusler alloys, there are about a few tens of alloys reported to become the HMFs according to theoretical calculations to date [see Tables 1 and 2]. For example, a Co2CrAlalloy has been theoretically calculated to become a HMF [70]; however, TC has been reported to be around RT (334 K) for bulk [71]. In order to increase TC, the substitution of the Cr atoms with the Fe atoms has been successfully reported experimentally [72,73], proving the spin engineering bycrystallographical manipulation.
Figure 10.
Total spin magnetic moments per unit cell (Mt/f.u.) as a function of the total number of valence electrons in the unit cell for major Heusler alloys. The lines represent three different forms of the generalised Slater-Pauling curves. Reprinted with permission from Skaftouros et al. [74]. Copyright 2006. The American Physical Society
Total spin magnetic moments per unit cell (Mt/f.u.) as a function of the total number of valence electrons in the unit cell for major Heusler alloys. The lines represent three different forms of the generalised Slater-Pauling curves. Reprinted with permission from Skaftouros et al. [74]. Copyright 2006. The American Physical SocietyList of major magnetic properties of half-metallic half-Heusler alloys. Italic and roman letters correspond to calculated and experimental values, respectively. * indicates calculated total magnetic moments per formula unit, while the others are calculated spin magnetic moments per formula unitList of major magnetic properties of full-Heusler alloys. Italic and roman letters correspond to calculated and experimental values, respectively. * indicates calculated total magnetic moments per formula unit, while the others are calculated spin magnetic moments per formula unit. Spin-polarisation values with † and †† are estimated at RT and 2 K, respectively, by using Jullière’s formula [8]. Several non-half-metallic full Heusler alloys are also shown in brackets as references
Ferromagnetic Heusler alloys
Half-Heusler alloy films
Since the pioneering theoretical prediction on the half-metallicity of a NiMnSb half-Heusler alloy [34], this alloy has been intensively investigated to confirm its half-metallicity experimentally. As listed in Table 1, the magnetic moment per formula unit and the bandgap δ are calculated as 3.99 μB/f.u. and 0.5 eV [69], respectively. The corresponding spin polarisation is calculated to be 99.3% [75]. For a bulk single crystal, the NiMnSballoy has indeed been measured to show almost 100% spin polarisation at EF by means of spin-polarised positron-annihilation [76,77]. Both ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) co-sputtering [78] and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [79] techniques are employed to grow epitaxial films, which are characterised mostly by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and magnetocrystalline anisotropy measurements. However, the spin polarisation is found to be only 28% at 0.4 K estimated from TMR [79]. For the NiMnSb film grown in a similar manner, the surface spin polarisation P is measured to be only ~58% [36]. This large departure from the bulk property can be explained by the presence of the atomic disorder at the emptysites [80]. δ for the minority spins at EF is reported to vanish with an atomic disorder of more than 7%. In addition, the surface state is very fragile due to the reduced symmetry and the surface reconstruction [81,82]. On the contrary, epitaxialNiMnSb (100) films grown on Mo(100) buffers on MgO(111) substrates have shown (67 ± 9) to 100% spin polarisation at the MnSb terminated surface, which is much higher than that of 50% for polycrystalline samples measured by angle-resolved X-ray photoemission [83]. A study on epitaxialNiMnSb(001) growth on MgO(001) hasalso been performed with using a V(001) buffer layer by Turban et al. [84]. They find the Stransky-Krastanov growth mode under the optimised growth temperature of 620 K. The corresponding magnetic moment is estimated to be (3.9 ± 0.2) μB/f.u., which agrees almost perfectly with the calculations [34,69].
Table 1.
List of major magnetic properties of half-metallic half-Heusler alloys. Italic and roman letters correspond to calculated and experimental values, respectively. * indicates calculated total magnetic moments per formula unit, while the others are calculated spin magnetic moments per formula unit
Half Heusler alloys
Magnetic moment [μB/f.u.]
δ [eV]
TC [K]
P [%]
Refs.
Calculation
Experiment
NiMnSb
4.00 [34]
3.85 (bulk) [45,88]
0.5 [69]
900~1112 [100]
99.3 [82]
[78,79,82,85–87,90–95]
3.9910 [75]
3.6 (poly) [89]
0.5 [83]
730 (bulk) [45]
58 ± 2 [36]
3.991 [69]*
3.9 ± 0.2 [84]
0.55 [61]
~ 44 [89]
3.96 [70,87]
4.01 ± 0.02 [87,90]
~ 100 [76,77]
PtMnSb
4.00 [34]
4.14 (bulk) [45]
582 (bulk) [45]
[92,96]
3.997 [69]*
3.97 (bulk) [88]
[99]
FeMnSb
1.930 [97]* [69]*
0.436 [60]
99.3 [75]
2.000 [98]
CoMnSb
2.949 [67]* [69]*
4.0 (bulk) [45]
~ 1 [69]
671~815 [100]
99.0 [75]
[88]
3.000 [99]
3.00 [61]
490 (bulk) [45]
3.03 [61]
CoTiSb
0.95 [101]
0.82 [69]
1.03 [102]
NiTiSb
0.0 [101]
0.14 [69]
330 (bulk) [70]
FeVSb
0.36 [69]
0.38 [63]
CoZrSb
0.83 [69]
EpitaxialNiMnSb(001) growth on GaAs(001) has been studied systematically by van Roy et al. [85]. The films are grown at RT (300 K) to avoid interfacial Mn2As mixing between NiMnSb and GaAs, which may introduce a magnetically dead layer. The lattice constant is slightly enhanced to 0.5904 ~ 0.5909 nm ascompared with the bulk value (0.5903 nm) due to the small lattice mismatch with GaAs. Stoichiometric epitaxialNiMnSb films are also grown on GaAs(111)B [86]. These results clearly indicate that the presence of the vacancysites in the half-Heusler alloy [see Figure 4(a)] does not contradict high chemical ordering under preciselycontrolled deposition. Theyalso find that these films contain very small point defect concentrations: 1.1% Mn planer defects appear in a 1 nm thick region in the vicinity of the NiMnSb/GaAs:B interface, which agrees very well with calculations that the half-metallicity can be recovered within less than 6 atomic planes (≤0. 7 nm) [91]. For the NiMnSb interfaces, the lattice mismatch is calculated to induce strain: 2% lattice expansion reduces δ by 0.25 eV, while 2% lattice compression increases δ by 0.5 eV [88], and the −2 to +3% lattice expansion maintains the half-metallicity [87].Besides the possible disappearance of the half-metallicity due to the atomic disorder and the interfacial mixing, which can be overcome by the optimised growth as mentioned above, the surface spin polarisation is calculated with respect to the interfaces, the crystalline orientations and the terminated lattice planes. For the NiMnSb(001) surfaces, the Ni-terminated surface compresses the distance between the topmost Ni atoms and the subsurface MnSb layers by 10% (P = 42%), while the MnSb-terminated surface reduces the distance between the topmost Mn and the subsurface Ni layers by 3.5% and expands that between the topmost Sb and the subsurface Ni layers by 7.3% (P = 84%) [94]. The NiMnSb(111) surfaces, on the other hand, show much larger surface deformation: The Ni-terminated surface shows 23% and 18% reduction in the Ni-Sb and Ni-Mn distances, respectively, reducing the corresponding P significantly. For the case of a NiMnSb/InP interface, the Mn surface is calculated to increase the spin moment up to 4.0 μB, inducing the corresponding spin polarisation of about 74%, while the Ni/P interface reduces the spin polarisation down to 39% for the first two interfacial layers [95].Similar argument can be applied for the other half-Heusler alloy films. PtMnSb films are deposited on Al2O3(0001) [96,99] and MgO(001) [103] by sputtering to form spin-valve structures, showing <1% giant magnetoresistance (GMR) at RT. This small GMRratio mayalso be due to the emptysite disorder at the interfaces. Calculations suggest the decrease in the surface spin polarisation depends on the terminated layers; P ~ 46% and 22% for the MnSb and Pt termination, respectively, [92]. The other half-Heusler alloy of CoMnSb shows a similar decrease in the surface spin polarisation and the bandgap by the strain: +2% and – 2% lattice deformation shifts δ by – 0.8 eV and + 0.9 eV, respectively [94].
Full-Heusler alloy films
Co-based full-Heusler alloys
Co2MnZ
A pioneering work on the growth of full-Heusler-alloy films has been carried out for a Co2MnGe/GaAs(001) hybrid structure by Ambrose et al. [104]. They obtain an epitaxialCo2MnGe film with a slightly enhanced lattice constant ascompared with bulk. The magnetic moment is estimated to be 5.1 μB/f.u., which almost perfectly agrees with the bulk value [see Table 2]. For this alloy, calculations suggest that the strong reduction in the magnetic moment may occur near the Co2MnGe/GaAs interface due to the Co-As and Co-Ga bonding [105].
Table 2.
List of major magnetic properties of full-Heusler alloys. Italic and roman letters correspond to calculated and experimental values, respectively. * indicates calculated total magnetic moments per formula unit, while the others are calculated spin magnetic moments per formula unit. Spin-polarisation values with † and †† are estimated at RT and 2 K, respectively, by using Jullière’s formula [8]. Several non-half-metallic full Heusler alloys are also shown in brackets as references
Full Heusler alloys
Magnetic moment [μB/f.u.]
δ [eV]
TC [K]
P [%]
Refs.
Calculation
Experiment
Co2MnAl
4.09 [106]
4.01 (bulk) [45]
0.306 [109]
693 (bulk) [45]
42 [110]†
[112]
4.10 [107]
58 [111]†
[113]
3.970 [67]
60 [62]
[114]
4.020 [108]
4.036 [69,97] *
Co2MnSi
5.00 [106]
5.07 (bulk) [45]
0.419 [109]
740 ~ 857 [100]
54 ± 3 [117]
[114]
4.96 [115]
5.10 ± 0.04 (bulk) [116]
0.81 [121]
985 (bulk) [45]
35 [122]†
4.940 [67]
4.95 ± 0.25 [117]
690 [57]
89 [122]††
5.0 [116]
4.7 [118]
900 [62]
56 [62]
5.008 [69,97] *
5.0 [119]
5.1 [120]
Co2MnGa
4.14 [106]
4.05 (bulk) [45]
694 (bulk) [45]
~ 50 [123]
[124]
4.21 [107]
700 [62]
60 [62]
3.72 [115]
4.058 [67]
Co2MnGe
5.00 [106]
5.11 (bulk) [45]
0.210 [109]
905 (bulk) [45]
58 [62]
[105]
4.84 [115]
4.93 (bulk) [125]
~ 0.5 [106]
900 [62]
[126]
4.941 [67]
5.1 [104]
5.0 [120]
5.012 [69,97] *
Co2MnSn
5.03 [106]
5.08 (bulk) [45]
0.174 [109]
829 (bulk) [45]
60 [62]
[114]
4.78 [115]
800 [62]
4.984 [67]
5.0 [116,120]
5.043 [108]
5.089 [69,97] *
Co2CrAl
2.99 [106]
1.55 (bulk) [45]
0.18 [87]
334 (bulk) [45]
~ 100 [87]
[131]
2.955 [67]
1.5 ~ 3 [129]
0.75 [127]
330 [130]
~97 [131]
[132]
3.007 [108]
0.53 [130]
0.18 [128]
600 [62]
~98 [128]
[133]
3.0 [87]
16 [132]†
[134]
2.999 [69] *
62 [62]
[135]
2.96 ~ 3.01 [127]
2.970 [128]
Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al
3.7 [131]
3.4 (bulk) [136]
~ 0.4 [127]
750 (bulk) [136]
~ 90 [141]
3.65 (bulk) [137]
665 ± 2 (bulk) [137]
~ 95 [128]
2.04 [73]
18 [73]†
3.5 [129]
25 [137]†
3.1 [132]
29 [132]†
3.2 (RT) (bulk) [138]3.49 (bulk) [139]
3.3 [140]
2.26 (RT) [38]
(Co2FeAl)
4.996 [106]
4.9 [129]
0.1 [127]
1170 (bulk) [61]
~ 30 [141]
[131]
4.98 [107]
4.8 [130]
46 [132]†
[132]
4.98 [67]
5.29 [139]
59 [62]
[135]
4.996 [69]*
4.811 [128]
Co2CrGa
3.01 [106]
3.01 (bulk) [141]
495 (bulk) [141]
95 [141]
61 [62]
Co2FeSi
5.28 [142]
0.35 [142]
1109 [143]
16 [145]
[150]
5.48 [143]
0.10 [143]
1100 [144]
57 ± 1 [147]
[151]
6.0 [144]
~ 0,15 [144]
1100 [62]
42 [148]
[153]
5.97 ± 0.05 [144]
74 [148]
[154]
6.00 [145]
60 [62]
[155]
5.5 [146]
5.73 [147]
4.36 ± 0.55 [148]
5.56 [148]
4.8 [149]
Co2FeGa
1100 [62]
58 [62]
Co2FeGe
1000 [62]
58 [62]
Co2NiGa
3.21 (bulk) [45]
670 [57]
Co2TiAl
1.00 [156]
0.438 [156]
135 (bulk) [157]
126 [66]
Co2TiSi
2.00 [156]
0.800 [156]0.62 [143]0.64 [157]
Co2TiGa
1.00 [156]
0.157 [156]
Co2TiGe
2.00 [156]
0.602 [156]
Co2TiSn
1.85 [115]
1.93 (bulk) [45]
0.478 [156]
359 [115]
57 [62]
1.784 [67]
1.92 (bulk) [158]
0.0123 [159]
359 (bulk) [45]
2.00 [156]
~ 350 (bulk) [159]
1.68 [158]
364 [62]
Co2VAl
48 [62]
Co2VSi
3 [[143]
0.68 [143]
566 [[143]
Co2ZrAl
194 [66]
Co2ZrSn
1.64 [158]
1.64 (bulk) [158]
Co2NbSn
1.08 [158]
0.94 (bulk) [158]
(Co2TiSb)
1.73 [156]
0.567 [156]
Co2FeGa
5.15 [115]
> 1100 [115]
(Ni2MnAl)
~ 350 [160]
(Ni2MnGa)
~ 320 [161]
[164]
~ 350 [162]
~ 340 [163]
(Ni2MnGe)
~ 320 [163,165,166]
(Ni2MnIn)
~ 170 (B2) [166]
318 (L21 and B2) [167]
34 [167]††
[168]
320 ~ 323 [66]
(Ni2MnSb)
334 [66]
(Ni2MnSn)
344 [66]
(Cr2MnP)
0.102
240
[169]
(Cr2MnAs)
0.096
250
[169]
Cr2MnSb
0.036
342
[169]
(Cr2MnBi)
–0.011
320
[169]
(Fe2VAl)
56 [62]
(Pd2MnSb)
247 [66]
(Pd2MnSn)
189 [66]
Consequently, systematic search has been widely performed over Co2Mn-based full Heusler alloys to realise the half-metallicity at RT; Co2MnAl [110-114], Co2MnSi [115-117,118-120,122], Co2MnGa [123,124] and Co2MnSn [114]. For Co2MnAl, an epitaxial film has been grown on a Cr buffer layer by UHV sputtering with the crystalline relationship of Co2MnAl(001)[110]||Cr(001)[110]||MgO(001)[100] but with the B2 structure [112]. For Co2MnSi, the L21 structure has been deposited using both UHV dc magnetron sputtering [117,118,120,122] and MBE techniques [119]. Some of these films are used as electrodes in MTJ and recently show largeTMRratios at low temperature, which is discussed in Sec. 4.3.Calculations imply that the strain induced in the unit cell can control the half-metallicity in the Co2MnZalloys assimilarly discussed for the half-Heusler alloys in Sec. 3.1. For Co2MnSi for example, the lattice compression of 4% increases δ by 23%, and a similar behaviour is expected for the other alloys [121]. Calculations also show that ± 2% change in the lattice constant preserves the half-metallicity in the Co2MnZalloys [69].
Co2(Cr,Fe)Al
Block et al. have presented large negative magnetoresistance (MR) at RT in a quaternary full Heusler Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Alalloy [136], which firmly proves the controllability of the spin DOS of the Heusler alloys by substituting their constituent elements. They report – 30% MR at RT for a pressed powder compact, which acts as a series of MTJs. As a result, a great amount of attempts has been made to utilise this alloy system to achieve a large MR ratio at RT due to the half-metallicity [73,129,132,137]. However, an epitaxial film is deposited on a MgO(001) substrate with the crystalline relationship of Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al(001)[100]||MgO(001)[110], showing only 2% GMR at RT (4% at 15 K) [129].The influence of the atomic disorder on the half-metallicity for the Co2Cr1-FeAl full Heusler alloys hasalso been systematically studied by Shirai et al. using first principles calculations [131,132,141]. In the Co2CrAlalloys, the atomic disorder between Cr and Al, which eventuallydeforms the crystalline structure from L21 into B2 at a disorder level of 0.5, maintains the very high spin-polarisation P of 97% for L21 and 93% for B2 [131]. The Co-Cr type disorder, however, destroys the half-metallicityrapidly: P falls to zero at a disorder level of 0.4 and the magnetic moment Mt reduces down to 2.0 μB/f.u. at the full disorder. For the Fe substitution x with Cr, P is calculated to stay above 90% up to x = 0.35. Similarly, in the Co2Cr1-FeAlalloys, the CrFe-Al type disorder preserves both P and Mt to be above 80% and 3.7 μB/f.u., respectively, up to the disorder level of 0.5, while the Co-CrFe disorder eliminates P at the disorder level of 0.3 [132]. These findings may explain the decrease in the estimated Mt in the earlier study [73].Strain also affects the half-metallicity in the Co2CrAlalloy according to calculations [72]. P stays ~ 100% in the lattice strain range between – 1 to + 3%, and is even higher than 90% under +10% strain. δ is also robust against the strain and can be maximised under +3% strain. P also remains ~100% against the tetragonal distortion in the range of ± 2%, which is a great advantage for the epitaxial growth study on major substrates.Experimentally, stoichiometric epitaxialCo2Cr1-FeAl films are directly grown on a GaAs(001) substrates using three-source co-evaporation with an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) MBE technique, resulting in polycrystallineCo2CrAl/GaAs and epitaxialL21Co2FeAl(001)/GaAs(001) hybrid structures [130]. The Co2FeAl film grown at 673 K forms an almost perfect L21 structure for the thickness above 7.5 nm, of which crystalline relationship is Co2FeAl(001)<110>||GaAs(001)<110> with showing strong uniaxial anisotropyalong the [1-10] direction with a magnetic moment of 4.8 μB/f.u. Even though the TMRratio for this film is only 9% at RT, the growth condition for this Heusler alloy system has been successfully optimised. For intermediate states, e.g., x = 0.4, the A2 structure appears below the thickness of 1.2 nm [2 monolayers (MLs)], followed by the formation of the B2 and then the L21 structures above 2.0 nm (3.5 MLs).
Ni-based full-Heusler alloys
Even though Ni2MnZ alloys are not predicted to become HMFs by calculations, detailed studies on epitaxial growth on GaAs and InAs have been reported by Palmstrøm [57]. By employing a Sc0.3Er0.7As buffer layer on GaAs(001), both Ni2MnAl [160] and Ni2MnGa [161-164] films are epitaxially grown. Although Ni2MnGa films are also epitaxially grown directly on GaAs(001) with the crystalline relationship of Ni2MnGa(001)[100][010]||GaAs(001)[100][010], no strong in-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy is observed in their magnetisation curves [164]. Ni2MnGe(001)/GaAs(001) [163,165] and Ni2MnIn(001)/InAs(001) [166] hybrid structures are additionally fabricated for evaluation. Their interfaces are reported to be very sensitive to the growth temperature: Interfacial mixture occurs at the growth temperature of 373 K, while a large number of planer defects are formed at 433 K for Ni2MnGe/GaAs [163]. All these films are slightly tetragonally elongated along the plane normalascompared with the bulk values due to the minor lattice mismatch with the semiconductor substrates, and eventually the Ni2MnIn film on InAs transforms into the B2 structure. First principles calculations demonstrate that a broad energy minimum of tetragonalNi2MnGa can explain stable pseudomorphic growth of Ni2MnGa on GaAs despite a nominal 3% lattice mismatch [161]. An antiferromagnetic (AF) phase of the Ni-based full-Heusler alloys is discussed in Sec. 5.2.
Major characterisations techniques of ferromagnetic Heusler alloys
X-ray diffraction
For the structural analysis on the Heusler alloys, XRD is the most commonly used technique. XRD analysis predominantly focuses on both superlattice peaks, (111) and (200), and the principal peak (220). The appearance of all three peaks corresponds to the formation of the C1 or L21 structures in the Heusler-alloy films, while the disappearance of the (111) peak represents the formation of the B2 structure and the disappearance of the two superlattice peaks indicates the formation of the A2 structure for the full-Heusler alloys. For the L21 structure of the X2YZ full-Heusler alloys, the structure amplitudes of the XRD (111), (200) and (220) peaks are given by F (111) = 4 | f
Y – f
Z |, F (200) = 4 | 2 f
X – (f
Y + f
Z) | and F (220) = 4 | 2 f
X + (f
Y + f
Z) |, respectively, where f
M (M = X, Y and Z) are the average scattering factors for the M atoms [162]. The principal reflection (220) satisfies the relationship (h + k + l)/2 = 2 n (h, k and l: Miller indices, and n: an integer number), and is not affected by the atomic disorder. When the disorder occurs absolutelyrandomly among the M atoms, the magnitude of the first two superlattice peaks are reduced by the factor S2, where S is the degree of long range ordering described with the number of the X atoms on the L21-ordered X sites n
X as S = {n
X – n
X (A2)}/{n
X (L21) – n
X (A2)} (S = 1 for the L21 structure). When the Y-Z disorder occurs, the second superlattice peak (200) with (h + k + l)/2 = 2 n + 1 is not affected, while the first peak with h, k and l are all odd is reduced by a factor of (1–2a) S2, where a is a disorder parameter defined as the fraction of the Y atoms occupying the Z sites (a = 0.5 for the B2 structure). By applying the structure amplitudes F(h k l), the XRD peak intensity I(h k l) can be calculated as follows: I (h k l) = | F (h k l) | 2
p {(1 + cos 2 2θ)/sin 2
θ cos θ} (p: multiplicity factor) [171]. For the polycrystallineCo2CrAlalloy for instance, the peak intensityratio normalised by the principal (220) reflection is calculated to be I (111): I (200): I (220) = 5: 6: 100, while it is 7: 5: 100 for the polycrystallineCo2FeAlalloy [130]. Comparison of these calculated values with experimental observations provides a measure of the atomic ordering in the Heusler alloy samples, however, cannot be applied directly to the epitaxial films.Takamura et al. demonstrated a quantitative analysis method of atomic disorders in Co2FeSi Heusler alloy using XRD. It is capable to evaluate all the atomic disorders for the exchanges X, Y and Z atoms in full-Heusler X2YZ. Such technique relies on the use of different atomic scattering factors (fCo and fFe) of Co and Fe for Co K source. Hence, superlattice diffraction intensities for Co K can reflect the D03 disorder [172]. A physical model proposed by Niculescu et al. was used so that the disorder parameters can be expressed in terms of , and . These parameters represent the quantitative disorder of B2 (atom mixing between Fe and Si), A2 (atom mixing between Co and Si) and D03 (atom mixing between Co and Fe) disorder, respectively [173].
Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy
Gabor et al. studied the correlation between the structural, electronic and magnetic properties of Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 epitaxial films [174]. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed to determine the crystalline structures of the films. Bright field images show that the sample has homogeneous roughness and thickness. Single-crystalline B2 structure is confirmed by the selected area diffraction pattern. In 2006, Sakuraba et al. illustrated the correction between the crystallinity of Heusler alloy films and the TMRratios [111]. Epitaxial and polycrystallineCo2MnAl films were imaged using bright field cross-sectional TEM. It is important to mention that the interfacial roughness between the Co2MnAl and AlO is greatly reduced for the epitaxialCo2MnAl film. Electron diffraction patterns show the disordered B2. Temperature-dependant MR measurements were also performed from 10 to 300 K. In general, epitaxialCo2MnAl shows about 15% higher MR ratio than the polycrystallineCo2MnAl, confirming the importance of the crystalline ordering on the spin polarisation and the corresponding MR ratios. Yamada et al. demonstrated the interface crystallinity of Co2FeSias a function of growth temperature [175]. Two-dimensional epitaxial structure is observed at the growth temperature of 333, 403 and 473 K. However, at 403 and 473 K single-crystal phases are observed using cross-sectional TEM. Nanobeam diffraction confirms the phases may be CsCl- and/or CaF2-type silicides such as nonmagnetic CoSi, FeSi and/or CoSi2 [176].These studies demonstrated structural characterisation on Heusler thin film samples using a cross-sectional TEM method. It also reveals the chemical distributions and crystalline ordering of the Heusler alloy films. However, some Heusler alloys form multiple phases instead of a single ordering structure, and their ratio is difficult to estimate.
Electrical resistivity
As the other macroscopic measure to assess the half-metallicity, electrical resistivity is commonly measured as a function of temperature, ρ (T). In general, the temperature dependence of the resistivity can be written as ρ (T) = ρ (4 K) + c T , where m is an exponent factor. In a conventional FM metal, since one-magnon scattering (or electron-electron scattering) dominates the resistivity at low temperature, m becomes 2 theoretically [177]. For HMF, due to the 100% spin polarisation, the one-magnon scattering is suppressed by the factor of exp (– δ/kB
T) (δ is energy bandgap for the minority spins at EF and kB is Boltzmann constant), leading to typically m = 1.5 at low temperature. At a finite temperature, spin fluctuation activates the minority band and unconventional one-magnon scattering starts to happen, which is described as m = 3.Experimentally, ρ (T) of an epitaxialNiMnSb film follows a T
1.55 law below 100 K as listed in Table 3, which clearly indicates the absence of spin-flip electron diffusion due to the half-metallicity [84]. For the full-Heusler alloys, on the other hand, ρ (T) is observed to be almost constant at low temperature, while m is measured to be m = 1.5 and (1.2 ± 0.1) at a finite temperature below RT in single-crystalCo2MnGe [104] and polycrystallineCo2MnGa films [124], respectively. Co2CrAl bulk similarly shows m = 3.15 at low temperature but 1.33 above 35 K [134]. EpitaxialCo2FeAl films show m = 2.6 below 50 K but 1.3 above 100 K [129], and m = 4.2 below 30 K but 1.5 above 115 K [130]. For Co2MnSi films [117], a relationship of ρ (T) = T
2 + T
4.5 is reported, which mayconsist of an electron-electron scattering term T
2 and a two-magnon scattering term T
4.5. Such a departure from the ideal law observed in the full-Heusler alloys, especially at low temperature, is mainly attributed to the presence of grain boundaries in the films, for the case of the polycrystalline films in particular [116].
Table 3.
List of exponent factors in the temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity ρ (T) = ρ (4 K) + c T for both half- and full-Heusler alloys. The residual resistivities (RRR) ρ (T)/ρ (4 K) are also shown
m at low temperature
m at high temperature
RRR
Refs.
Theory
1.5 (HMF)2.0 (conventional FM)
3.0 (non-rigid band)4.5 (rigid band)
[177]
NiMnSb
1.55 (< 100 K)
epi-C1b-MBE film/V seed/MgO(001) sub. [84]
Co2MnGe
0 (< 50 K)
~ 1.5 (> 50 K)
~ 1.28
epi-B2-MBE film/GaAs(001) sub. [101]
Co2MnGa
0 (< 100 K)
(1.2 ± 0.1) (> 200 K)
1.15 ~ 1.7
poly-(B2)-MBE film/GaAs(001) sub. [124]
2.1 (< 60 K)
1.31
2.47
Bulk [178]
Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al
2.6 (< 50 K)
1.3 (> 100 K)
epi-(B2)-sputtered film/MgO(001) sub. [129]
Co2CrAl
3.15 (< 35 K)
1.33 (> 35 K)
1.1
L21-bulk [134]
< 1
poly-B2-MBE film/GaAs(001) sub, [130]
Co2FeAl
2.6 (< 50 K)
1.3 (> 100 K)
epi-(B2)-sputtered film/MgO(001) sub. [129]
4.2 (< 30 K)
1.5 (> 115 K)
1.3
epi-L21-MBE film/GaAs(001) sub. [130]
Co2MnSi
6.5
single-crystal bulk [116]
2.22 (> 75 K)
1.367
L21-bulk [179]
2 (< 100 K)
4.5 (> 100 K)
1.41
poly-L21-sputtered film/a-Al2O3(0001) sub. [117]
Co2FeSi
3.5 (< 70 K)
1.65 (> 70 K)
1.5
epi-L21-sputtered film/MgO(001 sub. and Al2O3(11–20) sub. [149]
Co2TiAl
2 (< 100 K)
4.2
L21-bulk [157]
List of exponent factors in the temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity ρ (T) = ρ (4 K) + c T for both half- and full-Heusler alloys. The residual resistivities (RRR) ρ (T)/ρ (4 K) are also shownThe residual resistivityratio (RRR), ρ (300 K)/ρ (4 K), can also be used to characterise the bulk properties of the half-metallic films. For Co2MnGa [124] and Co2CrAl [130], the normalised resistivity ρ (T)/ρ (4 K) has been reported to decrease monotonically with increasing T, providing RRR to be less than 1, which is common for a highly resistive material, such as an intrinsic semiconductor. For most of the Heusler films, RRR is obtained to be approximately 1.3, e.g., 1.28 for a single-crystalCo2MnGe film [104] and 1.3 for epitaxialL21Co2FeAl film [130], which is much smaller than that observed for a Co2MnSi bulk single crystal (6.5) [116] and for Co2TiAl bulk (4.2) [157]. Since a very large RRR is reported for the bulk single crystal due to the improvement of the crystallinity of the alloy at low temperature, small RRRs for the Heusler films may indicate the stable crystallinity against temperature change. Bycomparing RRR with the ρ (T), an epitaxial Heusler alloy film without grain boundaries is expected to show the ideal ρ (T) behaviour.
X-ray magnetic circular dichroism
As a direct method to estimate the element specific magnetic moments per atom, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) has been exploited. XMCD measurements are performed at the L2 and L3 absorption edges of the constituent elements of the Heusler alloys, which represent the X-ray-induced excitation from the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 core levels into the valence d states, respectively [180]. A magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the sample films, realising the magnetisation of the samples to be aligned parallel (or antiparallel) to the incident circularly polarised X-rays. These two configurations provide the corresponding X-ray absorption spectra, both of which are measured by the total electron yield method, revealing the difference in the population between up and down spin electrons. The difference in absorption cross-sections represents the XMCD signals as a result. Since the orbital part of the atomic wavefunction interacts with the circularly polarised X-rays [181], which indirectly interact with the spins of the atoms through the spin–orbit interaction [182], non-zero XMCD signals can be observed in the vicinity of the L2 and L3 edges. By applying the sum rules [181-183] after relevant background subtraction, element specific spin magnetic moments per atom m
spin are estimated as listed in Table 4.
Table 4.
List of element-specific magnetic moments per atom for both half- and full-Heusler alloys
List of element-specific magnetic moments per atom for both half- and full-Heusler alloys
Bulk properties
For NiMnSb [84], Co2MnGa [124], Co2MnSi [149] and Co2FeSi [196], mspin for both Co and Y atoms show good agreement with theoretical calculations as listed in Table 4. On the contrary, for Co2(Cr,Fe)Al, mspin for Co maintains the good agreement, while that for Y (Cr and Fe) decreases significantlyascompared with the calculations. For the latter cases, the enhancement in morb is reported in general. It should be emphasised that the morb for Co in the epitaxial films is observed to be twice as largeas the calculation [130]. Similar enhancement in morb for Co hasalso been reported in a Co2MnGe bulk sample [125]. Such enhancement in morb for the transition metals X and Y suggests that the spin-orbit coupling in the Heusler alloys are very strong and may be the main reason to induce the half-metallicity.
Heusler alloy/tunnel barrier interfaces
Because the XMCD measurement is sensitive to the surface of the sample, typically probing within 10 nm from the surface, the measurement always suffers from the overlap of the surface signals with the bulk signals. For films, the asymmetry and dislocation in the vicinity of the interfaces between the Heusler alloy layers and the capping layers, which are usually deposited to prevent oxidation, reduce mspin. The samples can be capped with 3 ~ 4 nm oxide layers to mimic the interface between a FM Heusler alloy layer and an oxide tunnelling barrier. In 20 nm Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al with a 3 nm MgO epitaxial capping layer, the X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectra for both Cr and Fe possess minor splits in the peaks, corresponding to the oxidation of these elements [130]. For Co, on the other hand, no peak splitting is observed and the spin moment per atom is estimated to be 1.09 μB, which almost agrees with the calculated value (0.96 μB) [138]. For 20 nm Co2FeAl with a 4 nm cap, the spin moment per Co atom also show more than 80% of the calculated value, while that of Fe only satisfy less than 50% of the calculation [135]. These results suggest that the epitaxialL21Co2Cr1-FeAl films suffer from element selective oxidation at the interface with an oxide tunnel barrier and selective atomic disorder for Fe and Al, resulting in the decrease in the spin magnetic moments for Cr and Fe.An epitaxialL21Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al film has been prepared onto Al2O3(11–20) and MgO(001) substrates with an Fe buffer layer by sputtering [192]. For both cases, the spin moment for Co only shows about 15% decrease ascompared with the theoretical calculations [144], while that for Cr and Fe shows almost 90% and 30% decrease. This decrease is also attributed to the atomic disorder between Co and Cr/Fe atoms.Elmers et al. have reported the orbital magnetic moment per spin, r = morb/(mspin + mdipole), to be (0.14 ± 0.02) for Co and (0.06 ± 0.02) for Fe in the Co2FeAl bulk samples [138,139]. For the L21 epitaxialCo2FeAl films, by neglecting the magnetic dipole term, mdipole, r is estimated to be (0.098 ± 0.007) and (0.069 ± 0.005) for Co and Fe, respectively [135]. These values imply that Co does not show any enhancement in morb, while Fe shows similar enhancement as the bulk. Even so, it should be emphasised that morb for Co in the epitaxial films is observed to be twice as largeas the calculation (see Table 4). Similar enhancement in morb for Co has been reported in a Co2MnGe bulk sample [125]. Such enhancement in morb for the transition metals X and Y suggests that the spin-orbit coupling in the Heusler alloys are very strong and maybe the main reason to induce the half-metallicity. For sputtered Co2MnAl film with the atomically disordered B2 structure, the Gilbert damping constant is found to be small byferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurement (see more details in Sec. 4.8), indeed indicating weak spin–orbit interaction for the disordered phases [113]. The large spin–orbit interaction in the Heusler alloys hasalso been suggested from a largeAMR effect observed in polycrystallineCo2MnGa film, as largeas 6% at RT (8% at 1.6 K) [124].
Heusler alloy/substrate interfaces
Total (spin and orbital) moments of L21Co2MnGa films epitaxially grown on GaAs(001) by MBE has been systematically investigated to specifically observe the difference between the bulk and interface regions [189]. They have maintained almost the same thickness for their capping layers (1.5 ~ 1.7 nm) for these samples with changing the Heusler layer thickness to be 5.3, 7.6 and 9.7 nm. For the first sample, they observe that the total moments for Co are less than 20% of the calculation (and also observation for bulk), while that for Mn is less than one-third of the calculation and bulk. For the last sample, on the other hand, they find slight recovery in the Mn total moment up to over 50% of the calculation and bulk. A similar tendency hasalso been found in off-stoichiometric samples. These results strongly suggest the presence of a magnetic dead layer in the Heusler alloy films near the GaAs interface.EpitaxialL21 sputtered Co2FeSi(110) on an Al2O3(11–20) substrate has been investigated by XMCD to reveal the thickness dependence of the element-specific magnetic moments [192]. They observe approximately 80% of the calculated spin moments for both Co and Fe atoms with the film thickness larger than 10 nm. In the vicinity of the Al2O3 interface, a 0.8 nm thick magnetic dead layer is also found to be formed at RT.
Andreev reflection
Soulen et al. have first applied Andreev reflection to measure the spin-polarisation P of FM materials [36], and afterwards, this technique has been widely used to measure P of the Heusler alloysas listed in Tables 1 and Tables 2. This technique is based on the spectroscopic measurement in an FM/insulator/superconductor tunnelling junction developed by Tedrow and Meservey [198]. For the Andreev reflection, a superconducting point contact is used instead of a superconducting film, which allows to achieve spin-polarised electron injection into an FM film with forming a coherent pair with an oppositely spin-polarised electron in FM, while reflecting an Andreev hole back to the superconductor. This process occurs in addition to the conventional ohmic response at the interface. HMF with P = 100%, however, cannot offer the coherent pair when the majority spin is injected from the point contact due to the absence of the minority spins at EF. Although this is a very powerful technique to measure P directly, the estimated P typically reflects the spin DOS in the vicinity of the surface.Shigeta et al. have reported the spin polarisation of Ru2-FeCrSiHeusler alloys using the Andreev reflection [199]. Apart from determination of the spin polarisation, it also shows the structural ordering of RuFeCrSi depends on the Fe and Rucontent. For 0.1 ≤ x < 1.8, the L21 ordering is confirmed, whilst for x = 1.8, the crystalline structure becomes B2 [200,201]. The spin polarisation of x = 1.5 and 1.7 is measured to be P = 53 and 52%, respectively. Shigeta et al. also determined the spin polarisation of Co2FeSi, which is integrated with superconductor NbN on a MgO substrate. The average spin polarisation of Co2FeSi is reported to be (52 ± 2)%. Similar study on the other Co-based Heusler alloy, bulk Co2FeGa with the L21 ordering, is reported by Zhang et al. [178]. XRD measurement is undertaken for the bulk sample. The spin polarisation is measured to be P = 59%. Recent study hasalso reported spin polarisation of (54 ± 2)% at clean Co2FeSi/Nb interface in CPP-GMR-type junctions [202].
Bandgap measurements
Resolving the true bandgap of the half-metallic Heusler alloys was long a significant challenge due to the spin-dependent nature of the gap. The gapcould only be estimated by Andreev reflection (see Section 4.5), which are limited by the interfacial quality. Alhuwaymel et al. successfully showed a new technique for determining the spin bandgap using circularly polarised infrared (IR) radiation [68]. By sweeping the IR energy spectrum with an applied magnetic field both anti- and parallel to the polarisation of the radiation, the minority and majority bands can be probed independently. An absorption peak will be observed in only one orientation as the spin-polarised electrons which were excited by this radiation were absorbed by the bandgap of the Heusler alloy, in this case the full-Heusler alloysCo2FeSi [68] and Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 [203], with values of ~94 and ~110 meV were found, respectively.Similarly, light absorption spectroscopy has been used by Schmitt et al. on thermoelectric materials such as ZrNiSn half-Heusler alloys [204]. By varying the composition, such as via Sc-doping the semi-conducting nature of the minatory band can be switched from p- to n-type and the resulting bandgap observed. This highlighted several discrepancies with ab initio calculations due to hole/electron contributions, where a value of 0.13 eV compared to the theoretical value of 0.5 eV. These discrepancies are also in observed in the method of Alhuwaymel et al., as well as the work of Aliev et al. [205], suggesting that there is much to be done in the true determination of half-metallic bandgaps.
Gilbert damping constant
Gilbert damping constant α is the friction coefficient of magnetisation motion, which affects the switching speed of magnetisation reversal process. From a technological point of view, small α is required to reduce the switching current density Jc for the current-induced magnetisation switching process, because Jc is proportional to α [206]. According to the torque-correlation model proposed by Kambersky [207], α is proportional to the density of states, DOS, at EF. Therefore, it is expected that half-metallic materials which have an energygap in one spin channel exhibit relatively small α. In experiments, α can be evaluated using ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) [208], or time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect (TR-MOKE) [209]. Table 5 is a summary of reported values of α in experiments for Heusler alloys. Many of those presented relatively small α of less than 0.01. Mizukami et al. discussed correlation between the calculated DOS and the experimentally determined relaxation frequency G (= γαMs, where γ and Ms are gyromagnetic ratio and saturation magnetisation, respectively) for Co2FeAl films with changing the degree of order for the B2 phase, SB2: G and the number of DOS at EF exhibited similar trend on SB2 suggesting that the Gilbert damping is small half-metallic materials for which DOS is small at the EF [210]. Similar discussion has been done for other compositions such asCoFeGe0.5 [211], Co2(Fe,Mn)Si [212], Co2Mn(Al,Si) [212], Co2MnSi [213], CoFeMnSi [214] and so on. Recently, quite small α of less than 0.001 has been experimentally demonstrated for Co2MnSi films [213,215], which is done by improving the degree of L21 order possibly resulting in the improvement of the half-metallic property. The small α of the Heusler alloy films is suitable for reducing Jc of the current-induced magnetisation switching phenomena as well as for applying to a channel layer of spin-wave propagation experiments [216,217].
Table 5.
List of Gilbert damping constant α reported for Heusler alloy films
Material
Structure
Thickness(nm)
α
Method
Reference
Co2MnSi
L21
30
0.005
FMR
[212,218]
5
0.03
30
0.002
TR-MOKE
[219]
Co1.9Mn1.1Si
L21
30
0.0007
FMR
[213]
10
0.0007
FMR
[215]
Co2FeSi
L21
30
0.022
FMR
[212,218]
3
0.02
[220]
20
0.0018
FMR
[221]
Co1.75Fe1.25Si
L21
20
0.0012
FMR
[221]
Fe2CoSi
L21
20
0.0019
FMR
[221]
Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si
L21
30
0.004
FMR
[212,218]
3
0.013
[220]
CoFeGe0.5
B2
50
0.0025
FMR
[211]
Co2FeAl
L21
50
0.001
FMR
[210]
140
0.005
FMR
[222]
B2
50
0.003
FMR
[223]
B2 and A2
1
~0.015
TR-MOKE
[224]
Ni2MnSn
L21
40
0.0075
FMR
[225]
CoFeMnSi
L21
10
0.0027
FMR
[214]
List of Gilbert damping constant α reported for Heusler alloy films
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is based on the interaction between the spin of a nucleus with the surrounding fields, such as external magnetic field, neighbouring nuclei, surrounding electrons of the nucleus, and surrounding electrons of neighbouring atoms [226,227]. NMR is a good probe to characterise the local information of Heusler alloys. Because the shape of resonance spectrum is sensitive to the change of hyperfine field reflecting the local environment. Chemical degree of order as well as the chemicalcomposition can be quantitatively evaluated using NMR: e.g., Wurmehl et al. carried out an NMR study on Co2Mn1-FeSiHeusler alloys with several Fecomposition x in the bulk samples, and quantitatively evaluated the chemical ordering especially focusing on the distribution of Fe-Mn atoms using spin-echo NMR of 55Mn nuclei [228]. The chemical ordering between Fe and Mn is not easy to characterise using, e.g., laboratory X-rays because the atomic numbers of those are close each other, thus NMR is useful for characterising Heusler alloys which often consists of atoms with similar atomic numbers. For further detail of NMR study on Heusler alloys, review articles are found in refs. [229,230].
Mössbauer spectroscopy
Mössbauer spectroscopy is a spectroscopic technique on resonant absorption of γ-ray by nuclei in solids, which provides information of local electronic states of the material. Experimental studies on Heusler alloys using Mössbauer spectroscopy have been reported since 1960’s, in which bulk samples containing Sn or Fe, e.g., Co2MnSn [231], Fe3Sn [232], were selected, because 57Fe and 119Sn isotopes are suitable for NMR measurements in laboratories. Heusler alloys of films forms have been also studied using Mössbauer spectroscopy in the last decade, which revealed local magnetic properties of ternary- and quarterly-Heusler alloy films quantitatively [233-235]. Mössbauer spectroscopy can be also applied for studies of interfaces in layered film samples, which is useful for optimisation of spintronic devices, because magnetic properties at the interface sensitivelyaffect the spin-dependent transport in MTJs or CPP-GMR junctions. Tanaka et al. fabricated layered film samples consisting of a MgO/Co2FeGe structure for MTJ application, using molecular beam epitaxy technique. Theycontrolled the metallic termination layer at the interface: Co-termination or 57Fe-Ge termination, and discussed hyperfine-field distribution at the 57Fesites [236]. Similar study hasalso been done for metallic-layered filmsconsisting of a Co2FeGe/Ag structure for CPP-GMR junctions. The dependence on the deposition temperature of Co2FeGe layer was discussed for the degree of order at the Co2FeGe/Ag interface, which is consistent with the CPP-GMRratios using similar sample structures [237]. Review articles of Refs. [230,238] are to be referred for further detailed studies on Heusler alloys using Mössbauer spectroscopy.
Applications of ferromagnetic Heusler alloys
Spin injection
In order to achieve highly efficient spin injection from an FM film into a semiconductor or an NM metal, two distinct approaches have been proposed theoretically; spin injection from FM with almost 100% spin polarisation, such as HMF and DMS, in a diffusive regime [19], and that through a tunnel barrier in a ballistic regime [239]. For the former case, the Heusler alloy is one of the best candidates due to their good lattice matching with major semiconductors and their high TCas discussed above. Diffusive spin injection holds a key to realise the spin-polarised three-terminal devices, such as a spin-polarised field-effect transistor [240] and a lateral spin-valve [241] at RT.A NiMnSb(111)/CdS(111) interface is suggested to suppress the spin-flip electron transport at EF [94], indicating the possible use of the NiMnSb film as a spin-filter to inject a spin-polarised electron current into the semiconductor. A similar effect is expected even for the electron transport in the (110) orientation in a non-half-metallic Ni2MnIn/InAs interface, resulting in P ~ 80% [168]. At this interface, only the electron spins within an energy of kBT ≈ 1/40 eV at EF in Ni2MnIn are travelled into InAs. EF must be close to the conduction band of InAs for the spins to fill these unoccupied states. Since the conduction minimum occurs at the Γ point, the transmittances for the minority spins are calculated to depend on the crystalline directions; 0.75, 0.82 and 0.99 for the [100], [110] and [111] directions, respectively. For the majority spins, on the other hand, the transmittances are calculated to be 0.19, 0.19 and 0.39 for the corresponding directions, respectively, since large spin-orbit scattering is expected at the interface to change the in-plane momentum to match an available state in InAs.For the case of the Co2CrAl/III–V semiconductor interfaces, the half-metallicity is calculated to be preserved for certain interfacialcombinations. For Co2CrAl/GaAs interfaces, the half-metallicity is preserved for the Co/As interface on the GaAs(001) surface and for Al/As on GaAs(110), while it is demolished for CrAl/As on GaAs(001) [132]. For Co2CrAl/InP interfaces, the Cr spin moment is calculated to be enhanced for both the CrAl/In and CrAl/P interfaces (P ~ 63% and 65%, respectively), while it is decreased for both the Co/In and Co/P interfaces (P ~ 56% and ~ 74%, respectively), even though the Cr spin moment is almost the same as the bulk value for both cases [133].Experimentally, spin injection has been reported in a Co2.4Mn1.6Ga/InGaAs quantum well (QW) structure [123]. Although P is measured to be ~50% by the Andreev reflection, the injected electron spin polarisation is estimated to be 13% at 5 K, which is smaller than that for an Fe/InAs QW. It is therefore essential to fabricate a sharp Heusler alloy/semiconductor interface with a relevant band matching as theoretically proposed in order to achieve highly efficient spin injection.In a lateral spin-valve structure, Co2FeSi has been used as an FM injector into Cu, achieving 27% spin injection efficiency [242]. This is the highest efficiency reported to date based on the optimised fabrication technique.
Anisotropic magnetoresistance effect
A recent theoretical work predicts that a sign of an anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR) ratio of half-metallic materials is negative [243]. An AMRratio effect has been systematically investigated in Co2MnZ and Co2FeZ (Z = Al, Si, Ge and Ga) epitaxial films [244]. The sign of an AMRratio is negative when the total valence electron number is between 28.2 and 30.3, while that is positive when the total valence electron number is below 28.2 and above 30.3. These findings indicate that EF overlaps with the valence or conduction band edges of half-metallic gap with the valence electron number to be either ∼ 28.2 or 30.3, respectively. Half-Heusler NiMnSb epitaxial films also show a negative AMRratio [245,246]. Recently, a further study has been achieved by Sato et al. on epitaxialCo(Mn0.44Ga0.56)100- thin films. The Cocomposition of x wascontrolled between 47.4 and 52.6 at%. The corresponding AMRratios were measured by changing the electric current relative to the magnetic field directions between 5 and 300 K. The results show that the sign of the AMRratios changes according to the current directions. The maximum AMRratio is obtained at x = 49.7 at% [247]. AMR can be used as a way to optimise a composition of half-metallic Heusler alloys for the RT half-metallicity. The magnitude of the negative AMRratio gradually increases with shifting EF away from the gap edges.
Giant magnetoresistive junctions
In-plane magnetic anisotropy
Half-Heusler alloys
GMR junctions with FM Heusler alloy films have been studied over the last decades to achieve the requirement for the next-generation magnetic storage and memory [248] as shown in Figure 1. Both current-in-plane (CIP) and current-perpendicular-to-the-plane (CPP) GMR have been investigated with [NiMnSb/Cu]10, [NiMnSb/Cu]10, NiMnSb/Cu/Ni0.80Fe0.20 (or NiMnSb/FeMn) and NiMnSb/Cu/Ni0.80Fe0.20 (or NiMnSb/FeMn) [249,250]. The former multilayers show a CPP-GMRratio of 4.5% at 4.2 K. The latter spin-valves show a CPP-GMRratio of 7.2% at 4.2 K.Similar progress can be found for the GMR junctions with the half-Heusler alloy films. PtMnSb films are deposited on Al2O3(0001) by sputtering to form a spin-valve structure, PtMnSb(111)/CuMnSb(111)/PtMnSb(111)/MnFe, showing 0.47% GMR at RT [96]. This small GMRratio may be due to the emptysite disorder and interfacial defects. As discussed in Sec. 3.1, the terminations and crystalline directions of the Heusler alloy films can control the effective spin polarisation, which needs to be optimised in a junction. Recently, a CPP-GMRratio of 8% at RT (21% at 4 K) has been reported in fully epitaxialNiMnSb (20)/Ag (5)/NiMnSb (7) (thickness in nm) junctions with the (001) orientation [246]. The junctions achieve RA = (26 ± 1)×10−3 Ω·μm2. By repeating two sets of epitaxialGMR junctions, consisting of NiMnSb (9)/Ag (5)/NiMnSb (3)/Ag (5)/NiMnSb (9) (thickness in nm), further increase in the CPP-GMRratio up to 11% (41% at 4 K) has been reported by using a dual spacer [251]. Here, RA is found to be reduced to 3.9 × 10−3 Ω·μm2, which is favourable for device applications as mentioned above.
Full-Heusler alloys
In 2001, a GMR junction, consisting of Co2MnGe (6)/V (1.6)/Co2MnGe (3)/Fe (0.3)/ZnSe (50)/GaAs(001) (thickness in nm) have been fabricated and measured along the two [110] directions [252]. The corresponding GMRratio is measured to be less than 1%. Since then, a series of GMR junctions have been designed and evaluated, especially utilising an epitaxial film to achieve high crystalline ordering. Epitaxial films are typically deposited on a MgO(001) substrate with the crystalline relationship Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al(001)[100]||MgO(001)[110] or a Ag seed layer. For a CIPconfiguration, a multilayer of a [Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al (10)/Cu (2.5)/Fe0.1Co0.9 (8.1)] stack (thickness in nm) has been used with showing only 2% GMR at RT (4% at 15 K) [129]. Co-Fe-Al has then been used to show up to 3.3% CPP-GMRratio at RT [253,254], followed byCo2MnSi with a Cr spacer with the CPP-GMRratio of 2.4% and RA of 19 × 10−3 Ω·μm2 [255]. By replacing the Cr spacer with Cu to minimise the interfacial atomic diffusion and mixing, the CPP-GMRratio is increased to 8.6% at RT (30.7% at 6 K) [256]. In parallel, the Ag spacer has been commonly used, achieving a CPP-GMRratio of 6.9 (14)% at RT (6 K) using Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5/Ag/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 [257]. Further enhancement has been reported for a CPP configuration, e.g., Co2MnSi (8.8)/Ag (5)/Co2MnSi (8.8) (thickness in nm) with a GMRratio and RA of 28.8% and 3.1 × 10−2 Ω·μm2 at RT, respectively [258], and Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 (2.5)/Ag (5)/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 (2.5) (thickness in nm) with a GMRratio and RA to be 34% (80% at 14 K) and 1.5 × 10−2 Ω·μm2 at 290 K, respectively [259].In 2011, a large CPP-GMRratio of 42% has been reported using Co2FeGe0.5Ga0.5/Ag/Co2FeGe0.5Ga0.5 junctions [260], followed by the increase to 59.6 (200)% at RT (10 K) with a AgZn spacer [261]. Theoretically, a larger GMRratios are expected, e.g., 90% and ~60% for L21- and B2-Co2MnAl/Ag/Co2MnAl junctions, respectively [262]. A Co2Fe0:4Mn0:6Si/Ag/Co2Fe0:4Mn0:6Si junction with the L21 ordering shows further increase in the CPP-GMRratio of 74.8% with RA of (67.6 ~ 369.2)×10−3 Ω·μm2. Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si/Ag/Co2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si shows a 58 (184)% GMRratio at RT (30 K) [263,264]. Further improvement has been achieved by sandwiching the Ag spacer with NiAlasCo2Fe(Ga0.5Ge0.5)/NiAl/Ag/NiAl/Co2Fe(Ga0.5Ge0.5), showing the GMRratio of 82 (285)% at RT (10 K) and RA of 4 × 10−2 Ω·μm2 [265]. This is the largest GMRratio reported to date, indicating that further improvement in the GMR should be achievable bycontrolling the interfacial smoothness without atomic defects in the junction to meet the roadmap produced by the IEEE Magnetics Society [39].
Alternative spacers
A L12 Ag3Mg spacer has been used in a CPP-GMR junction with epitaxialCo2Fe0.4Mn0.6Si Heusler alloy films with <3% lattice matching [266]. The maximum RA and the GMRratio are reported to be 25 × 10−3 Ω·μm2 and 63%, respectively, at RT. A review on CPP-GMR junctions with Heusler alloys can be found in Ref [267]. The counterpart approach from MTJ is described in Section 5.4.1(iii). Further reduction in RA has been achieved with In-Zn-O and 0.2 ~ 0.6 nm thick Ag insertion, which is similar to nano-oxide layer (NOL) structures demonstrated by Toshiba [268], showing RA ~ 0.1 Ω·µm2 and an MR ratio of 32% [269].
Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy
Since the discovery of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) at an Fe/MgO interface [16,270-271], MgO layer insertion has been widely used to induce PMA, which is, however, not applicable for a GMR junction. Mn-based binaryHeusler alloys are alternative choices [272]. Recently, a body-centred cubic (bcc) seed layer has been used to minimise the interfacial mixing with fcc Heusler alloy layer [273]. For a bcc vanadium seed layer, X-ray analysis shows that 25-nm-thick vanadium introduces a strong (110) orientation in the Co2FeSi Heusler alloy. The B2-texture of the Co2FeSi is found to match that of the vanadium proving that the texture is defined by the seed layer. Reduction of the Co2FeSi thickness is found to result in a reduction in the strength of the in-plane anisotropy, as expected from the cubic nature. Since the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) is induced at the interface between Co2FeSi and V, a second vanadium interface is added and found to increase the observed PMA. Further reduction in the thickness of the Co2FeSi layer lead to an increase in the PMA where 4-nm-thick Co2FeSi exhibited a strong PMA (see Table 6).
Table 6.
List of measured saturation magnetisation (MS) and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) for major Heusler alloys
Heusler Alloys
MS (emu/cm3)
PMA (erg/cm3)
Refs.
Mn3Ga
500
1.5 × 107
[274]
Mn2.5Ga
250
1.2 × 107
[275]
Co2FeAl/MgO
1000
(2 ~ 3)×106
[276]
1100
3.1 × 106
[277]
731
1.9 × 106
[278]
Co2FeAl/MgAl2O4
1200
4.2 × 106
[279]
V/Co2FeSi
700
1.75 × 103
[273]
W/WOx/Co2FeSi
400
4.00 × 103
[280]
W/Co2FeSi
600
–
[281]
List of measured saturation magnetisation (MS) and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) for major Heusler alloysFor further improvement in PMA, tungsten is selected due to the lower bulk resistivity of 5.6 × 10−6 Ω·cm [282], which is almost a half of that of vanadium (1.9 × 10−5 Ω·cm) [283]. High-temperature growth at 673 K is applied for tungsten, providing the (110) surface orientation as well [280,281]. The magnetisation of the W/Co2FeSi sample is measured to be 400 emu/cm3 with the perpendicular anisotropy of 8 × 105 erg/cm3 as summarised in Table 6. Since the crystalline plane induced by the bcc seed layers is (110), which is a favourable orientation to promote the layer-by-layer crystallisation, low-temperature crystallisation has been demonstrated with PMA [281]. Samples consisting of W (10)/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 (12.5)/W (1.2)/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 (2.5)/Ta (2) (thickness in nm) have been deposited at 355 K for 2 min. MS reaches ~1060 emu/cm3, which is almost 85% of the theoretically predicted value, and it is ideal for device implementation due to the low-temperature crystallisation. A GMR junction with an Ag spacer unfortunately shows only 0.03% at RT, which requires further optimisation for device implementation.
Magnetic tunnel junctions
As shown in Figure 11(a), TMRratios have not been increased over 10 years since the report by Ikeda et al. with coherent tunnelling using a MgO barrier [16]. Great efforts have hence been devoted for the increase in the TMRratios with half-metallic Heusler alloy filmsas detailed below.
Figure 11.
(a) Recent progress in TMR ratios with different junctions. (b) Temperature dependence of TMR ratios for MTJs with Co-based full Heusler alloy films. Experimental data are taken from Refs. [292] for Co2MnGe/MgO/CoFe, [293], for Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al/MgO/CoFe, [118] for Co2MnSi/Al-O/CoFe, [148] for Co2MnSi/Al-O/NiFe, [294] for Co2MnSi/Al-O/CoFe and Co2MnSi/MgO/CoFe, [290] for Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5/MgO/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 and [295] for Co2Mn1.30Si0.84/MgO/Co2Mn1.30Si0.84 as well as NiFe/Al-O/NiFe, [14] for CoFe/MgO/CoFe and [296] for CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB
(a) Recent progress in TMRratios with different junctions. (b) Temperature dependence of TMRratios for MTJs with Co-based full Heusler alloy films. Experimental data are taken from Refs. [292] for Co2MnGe/MgO/CoFe, [293], for Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al/MgO/CoFe, [118] for Co2MnSi/Al-O/CoFe, [148] for Co2MnSi/Al-O/NiFe, [294] for Co2MnSi/Al-O/CoFe and Co2MnSi/MgO/CoFe, [290] for Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5/MgO/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 and [295] for Co2Mn1.30Si0.84/MgO/Co2Mn1.30Si0.84 as well as NiFe/Al-O/NiFe, [14] for CoFe/MgO/CoFe and [296] for CoFeB/MgO/CoFeBAn epitaxial half Heusler NiMnSb film has been first used as an electrode in MTJ, showing 9% TMR at RT [77]. Apart from this pioneering work, veryfew studies were performed on MTJ with half-Heusler alloys.(a) Co An epitaxial full Heusler Co2FeAl film with the L21 structure is also applied for MTJ but shows only 9% TMR at RT [130]. The small TMRratios may be caused by the selective oxidation at the interface between the Heusler films and the oxide barriers according to XMCD measurements [38]. Recently, an epitaxialL21Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al film sputtered onto a MgO(001) substrate has been adopted for a fully epitaxial MTJ with the structure of Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al/MgO/CoFe, showing 42% at RT (74% at 55 K) [140]. Even though this film possesses the epitaxial relationship Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al(001)[100]||MgO(001)[110], the magnetic moment is estimated to be 3.3 μB/f.u., which is smaller than the calculation (3.7 μB/f.u.) [141]. This indicates that the film contains an atomically disordered phase, which mayalso be suggested from the decrease in the TMRratios below 55 K. Further optimisation results in the TMRratio to become 109% at RT and 317% at 4 K with RA ~ 3 × 104 Ω·µm2 [284]. The TMRratios have further been increased to 330% at RT (700% at 10 K) with RA = 1 × 103 Ω·µm2 in MTJ with Co2FeAl/MgO/Co0.75Fe0.25 by utilising the Δ1-band connection between Co2FeAl and MgO [285]. Using a MgAl2O4 barrier instead of MgO to maintain the Δ1-band connection and to make better lattice matching with B2-Co2FeAl, TMRratios are found to be increased to 342% at RT (616% at 4 K) with RA = 2.5 × 103 Ω·µm2 [286]. The departure of the TMRratios from theoretically predicted almost infinity mayalso be due to the interfacialatomic disorder, due to the presence of a light element of aluminium segregated from the matrix.For polycrystalline sputtered full Heusler MTJs, on the other hand, much smaller TMRratios have been reported. MTJ with the structure of Co2Cr0.6Fe0.4Al/AlOx/CoFe shows 16% TMR at RT [73], which is later improved up to 19% at RT by the barrier optimisation [132]. By introducing a MgO underlayer, (001)-textured polycrystalline MTJs on a thermally oxidised Si substrate have been reported. MTJ with the structure of Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5/MgO/Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 shows 125% at RT and 196% at 7 K [287]. Later, an improved TMR of 175% was reported at RT using a Co2FeAl/MgO/CoFe structure [288].By replacing a half of Al with Si in Co2FeAl to stabilise the crystallisation, MTJs with an oriented MgO barrier for which TMRratios of 175% have been achieved at RT when using B2-Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5 [280]. Using L21-Co2FeAl0.5Si0.5, the TMRratios of 386% at RT and 832% at 9 K with RA = 80 × 103 Ω·µm2 has been reported later [290]. The decrease in the TMRratio with increasing temperature is much faster than the temperature dependence of the magnetisation T3/2, suggesting that a small fraction of atomically disordered phases cannot be ignored in the spin-polarised electron transport at finite temperatures [see Figure 11(b)] [291]. The elimination of such disordered interfacial phases improves the TMRratios further and realises the half-metallicity at RT.Theoretical calculations also suggest that the interface states within the half-metallic bandgap at the half-metal/insulator interfaces prevent the highly spin-polarised electron transport [296]. This is because the tunnelling rate is slower than the spin-flip rate, and therefore the interface states for the minority spins are effectivelycoupled to the metallic spin reservoir of the majority spin states. In order to avoid the spin-flip scattering, a sharp interface without the interface states is crucially required. Ležaić et al. discussed that the spin polarisation of half-metallic Heusler alloys can reduce significantly at temperatures much lower than their Curie temperatures even in bulk due to the change in hybridisation by spin fluctuation [297]. The other theoretical calculations revealed that an exchange stiffness constant of an interface at Co-based Heusler alloys and a MgO barrier is significantly smaller than that of bulk [298]. Such a situation leads to serious reduction of an effective spin-polarisation at finite temperatures due to enhanced thermal fluctuation of spin moments, inducing the large temperature dependence of a TMRratio [299]. In addition, large lattice mismatch between Co-based Heusler alloys and MgO, typically 5 ~ 7% for (001) growth, can easily introduce many misfit dislocations at the interface, which can cause suppression of the coherent tunnelling and increase the spin-flip scattering contribution [300]. Thus, introducing a larger exchange stiffness material at the interface, e.g., ultrathin Co-Fe [301], and a smaller lattice-constant barrier, e.g., MgAl2O4 [302], can be a possible solution to improve an RT TMRratio. These recent theoretical studies suggest that the elimination of interfacial states formed by lattice mismatch and atomic mixing can minimise the temperature dependence of the TMRratios.(b) CoSimilarly, an MTJ with Co2MnAl/Al-O/CoFe shows 40% TMR at RT [110], followed by the further improvement up to 61% at RT (83% at 2 K) [131]. All of these Heusler films in the MTJs have been reported to be B2 structure. Bycomparing the TMRratios at RT with those at low temperature, the ratios are found to show very weak temperature dependence assimilarly observed for a conventionalmetallic MTJ as shown in Figure 11.An MTJ with an epitaxialL21-Co2MnSi film has been reported to show very largeTMRratios of 70% at RT and 159% at 2 K with RA = 106 Ω·µm2 [122]. These values are the largest TMRratios obtained in MTJ employing a Heusler alloy film and Al-O barrier. This is purely induced by the intrinsic P of the Heusler electrodes. These MTJs with a highly ordered Co2MnSi film show strong temperature dependence on the contrary to the less-ordered MTJs as discussed above; 33% at RT and 86% at 10 K [118], and 70% at RT and 159% at 2 K [122]. Such a rapid decrease in the TMRratio with an increasing temperature is similar to that observed in MTJs with Co2(Cr,Fe)Al.By replacing Al-O with MgO, a fully epitaxial MTJ, consisting of Co2MnSi/MgO/Co2MnSi, has been reported to achieve much higher TMRratios, 217% at RT (753% at 2 K) [294] and 236% at RT (1,135% at 4 K), but with larger RA of 3 × 107 Ω·µm2 [303]. Further improvements in the TMRratio to be 354% at RT (1,995% at 4 K) have been achieved in the same system [304], followed by 366% at RT (2,110% at 4 K) with RA = 108 Ω·µm2 [305]. Partial substitution of Mn with Fe in these MTJs to form Co2Mn0.73Fe0.27Si, TMRratios are increased to 429% at RT (2,610% at 4 K) with RA = 7 × 107 Ω·µm2 [306], which is the largest TMRratio reported in a MTJ to date. A similar MTJ with Co2MnGe/MgO/Co2MnGe has been fabricated to show similar TMRratios of 220% (650% at 4 K), but with largeRA of 2.2 × 106 Ω·µm2 [307]. The other Heusler alloys, such as CeFeMnSi, show much steeper temperature dependence of the TMRratios, 101 and 521% at RT and 10 K, respectively [308]. The majority spin band with the ∆1 symmetry near EF is calculated to be significantly modified by the Mn-Fe swapping disorder, opening an additional path for tunnelling and reducing the TMRratio with elevating temperature. Such interfacial disorder mayalso be responsible for the strong temperature dependence.(iii) Alternative tunnelling barriers For the RA reduction, alternative tunnelling barriers have been investigated. CuIn0.8Ga0.2Se2 semiconducting barrier with almost perfect lattice matching with Co2FeGa0.5Ge0.5 shows MR ratios of 40 and 100% at RT and 8 K, respectively, with RA of 0.3 ~ 3 Ω·µm2 [309]. A CuGaSe2 barrier shows MR ratios of 100 and 246% at RT and 30 K, respectively, with the RA < 1 Ω·µm2 [310].
Binary Heusler alloys
By replacing Y atoms with X atoms, binaryHeusler alloys can be formed. For example, Mn3Ga shows ferrimagnetic (FI) behaviour in the tetragonal D022-phase with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, as schematically shown in Figure 12(a). The FI Mn3Ga has been reported to possess a large uniaxial anisotropy of 1 × 107 erg/cm3 [311] and high Curie temperature of ~770 K [312]. Mn3Ga has been used in an MTJ, consisting of Mn3Ga/MgO/CoFe and has shown 9.8% TMR at 300 K with the perpendicular anisotropy of 1.2 × 107 erg/cm3 [313].
Figure 12.
(a) The FI structure of D022 Mn3Ga or D022 Mn3Ge exhibiting overall c-axis anisotropy but with some in-plane component indicated by small circles. (b) FM structure of L10 MnGa with Mn atoms coupled ferromagnetically [314]. Reprinted with permission from Hirohata et al. [279]. Copyright 2018. MDPI AG
(a) The FI structure of D022 Mn3Ga or D022 Mn3Ge exhibiting overall c-axis anisotropy but with some in-plane component indicated by small circles. (b) FM structure of L10 MnGa with Mn atoms coupled ferromagnetically [314]. Reprinted with permission from Hirohata et al. [279]. Copyright 2018. MDPI AGThe TMRratio has then been improved by tailoring the interface using Co to be 40% at RT for the MTJ, consisting of Mn0.62Ga0.38 (30)/Mg (0.4)/MgO (1.8)/CoFeB (1.2) (thickness in nm) [315,316]. Similar efforts have been devoted on polycrystalline MTJ consisting of Mn3Ge/MgO/CoFeB, which shows a negative TMRratio of – 35 and – 75% at 300 and 3 K, respectively, and low RA of 10 Ω·µm2 [317].
MgO insertion
By inserting Co2MnSi between Mn-Ga and MgO, the perpendicular anisotropy of the Mn-Ga layer can induce perpendicular anisotropy in the half-metallic Co2MnSi layer, which is expected to achieve a largeTMRratio. Experimentally, TMRratios of 10% at RT and 65% at 10 K have been achieved [318], which is smaller than the Mn-Ga/MgO/Mn-Ga junctions, as above. Additionally, the Co2MnSi magnetisation is in tilted states during the reversal process, which causes the TMRcurves to be not well defined.Similar to the CoFeB/MgO/CoFeB systems, perpendicular anisotropy has been induced by attaching a MgO tunnel barrier. In a p-MTJ, consisting of Co2FeAl/MgO/Co0.2Fe0.6B0.2, a TMRratio of 53% has been reported at RT [277]. By inserting a 0.1-nm-thick Fe (Co0.5Fe0.5) layer between the MgO and Co0.2Fe0.6B0.2 layers, the TMRratio wassignificantly enhanced to 91% (82%), due to the improved interface. The corresponding RA is 1.31 × 105 Ω·µm2. By further improving the MTJ quality, consisting of Co2FeAl (1.2)/MgO (1.8)/Fe (0.1)/CoFeB (1.3) (thickness in nm), it has been reported to show TMR = 132% and RA = 1 × 106 Ω·µm2 at RT [319].By substituting some of Mg atoms, a MgAl2O4 [320] and MgGa2O4 [321] barrier can be formed, of which lattice constant matches perfectly with the Heusler alloy films. These spinel barriers show their corresponding TMRratios with respect to their thickness. The height of MgGa2O4 is found to be much lower than that of MgAl2O4. A Co2FeAl/MgAl2O4 epitaxial heterojunction with perpendicular anisotropy has been investigated for the understanding of the origin of the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy [322]. The strong anisotropy at the interface is attributed to (1) the reduced in-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy due to the lattice-matching and (2) the promoted hybridization between Fe and O orbitals due to the Al re-distribution near the interface.
PMA seed layer
A perpendicularly magnetised seed layer hasalso been used to induce perpendicular anisotropy onto the Heusler alloy films. For example, MTJ stack with L10-CoPt/Co2MnSi/MgO/FePt has been demonstrated [323], assimilarly reported in a conventionalCoFeB/MgO/CoFeB junctions.
Antiferromagnetic Heusler alloys
For an HDD read head and an MRAM cell, an AF layer has been traditionally used to pin one of the FM magnetisations to achieve a well-defined antiparallel magnetisation configuration. Additionally, AF spintronics has been widely studied based on spin polarisation induced by flowing an electricalcurrent in an AF layer [324]. For these spintronic applications, an IrMn3 alloy has been predominantly used due to its corrosion resistance and robustness against device fabrication processes in nanometre-scale in both thickness and in-plane dimensions. However, due to the scarcity of Ir as a platinum group metal, the price of IrMn3 has risen over 10 times in the last decade [325].For the development of a replacement for IrMn3, RT antiferromagnetism needs to be achieved. However, the majority of the AF materials have their Néel temperature TN near or below RT. Some oxides (e.g., NiO) and sulphides (e.g., CuFeS2) have TN > RT but they have very poor corrosion resistance and hence cannot be used in a device. Manganesealloys (e.g., NiMn and PtMn) and nitrides (e.g., MnN and MnSiN2) also have TN > RT. However, NiMn has poor corrosion resistance and PtMn has very high crystallisation temperature, indicating that they cannot be used in a device either. Therefore, there is strong demand for a new AF Heusler alloy to be developed.A list of major AF and compensated ferrimagnetic (CF) Heusler alloys is shown in Table 7. In Heusler alloys, half-Heusler alloys have low Néel temperatures in general. For example, CuMnSb [326], NdBiFe [327] and GdPdBi [328] have their TN to be 55, 2.18 and 13 K, respectively. These are not suitable for Ir-Mn replacement in spintronic devices due to their low TN < RT and due to the use of rare materials in the latter two alloys. Therefore, full-Heusler alloys have been focused for the development of AF films with their TN > RT.
Table 7.
List of major AF and CF Heusler alloys and their Néel temperatures (TN), Curie temperatures (TC), average blocking temperatures (), exchange biases (Hex) and their forms, bulk, epitaxial (epi.) or polycrystalline (poly.) films or calculations (calc.). Simulated results using molecular dynamics (MF) are also shown
Heusler alloys
TN [K]
TC [K]
<TB> [K]
Hex [Oe]
Forms
Refs.
CuMnSb
2
Bulk
[326]
NdBiFe
18
Bulk
[327]
GdPbBi
13
Bulk
[328]
Pt2MnGa
350
–
Bulk
[329]
Ru2MnGe
300
–
Bulk
[330]
320
Simulations
–
126
>81 (100 K)
Epi. Films
[331]
365
–
Calc.
[332]
Ru2MnSi
313
–
Calc.
335
Simulations
Ru2MnSn
296
–
Ru2MnSb
195
–
Ni2MnAl
313
–
Bulk (B2)
[333]
–
375
Bulk (L21)
245
–
Calc. (B2-I)
[334]
350
–
Calc. (B2-II)
–
368
Calc. (L21)
340372
–
Calc. (B2-I)MF Calc.
[335]
220352
–
Calc. (B2-II)MF Calc.
285
–
Calc. (B2-II)
310
–
>55 (10 K)
Epi. Films
[336]
Mn2VAl
>600
–
Bulk
[337]
>RT
–
~200
120 (4 K)20 (RT)
Epi. Films
360636
–
Calc.MF Calc.
Mn2VSi
–
<100
34 (100 K)
Poly. Films
[338]
Mn3Ga
470
–
Bulk
[339]
648
–
~400
1.5 k (RT)
Epi. Films
[340]
–
235
430 (120 K)
Poly. Films
[341]
Mn3.04Ge0.96
390
[342]
[343]
Mn3Ge
[344]
Mn2.4Pt0.6Ga
–
~90
33 k (2 K)0 (90 K)
Bulk
[345]
Mn1.8FeGa
–
~350
12 k (2 K)~300 (RT)
[351]
Mn2FeGa
[346]
Mn2.5Co0.3Ga1.2
–
>350
250 (RT)
Poly. films
MnN
660
–
388
1475 (RT)
Poly. Films
[347]
570
–
Calc.
Fe2VAl
Calc.
[348]
Poly. films
[349]
Cr2MnSb
342
Calc.
[169]
List of major AF and CF Heusler alloys and their Néel temperatures (TN), Curie temperatures (TC), average blocking temperatures (<TB>), exchangebiases (Hex) and their forms, bulk, epitaxial (epi.) or polycrystalline (poly.) films or calculations (calc.). Simulated results using molecular dynamics (MF) are also shownAs listed in Table 7, Fe2VAl, where Y and Z elements can be substituted with any other elements as listed in Figure 5, has been predicted to have a tendency to form a spin-glass (form AF ordering in Fe2.5V0.5Al) [348,349]. Mn2VAl is analogous to Fe2VAl but replaces the Fe with the very high moment Mn. These alloys can be further engineered by substituting some of Mn atoms with the other high-moment atoms to form (Co,Mn)2VAl for instance, which is analogous to the other two families with the exception that the element denoted X is now replaced by a mixture of two high moment atoms. By replacing V with Mn, low-moment-based alloys, e.g., Ni2MnAl, are anticipated to have a high compensated moment. By utilising a heavier element as a base of the Heusler alloys, Ru2MnAl is expected to have the potential advantage of having both X and Yas the high moment atoms. These families are anticipated to exhibit AF ordering. For RT antiferromagnetism, the AF phase should be stabilised by introducing larger anisotropy and larger AF grain volume. Recently, perpendicularly magnetised FM hasalso been reported to be pinned by IrMn layer [350]. Hence, the introduction of the additional tetragonal distortion into the cubic Heusler alloys may be necessary for the development of an RT AF.
Heavy-metal-based Heusler alloys
Epitaxially grown Ru2MnGe films have a very small lattice mismatch of 0.5% on a MgO(001) substrate with the relationship, Ru2MnGe[100](001)||MgO[110](001) (aRu2MnGe = 0.5985 nm, cRu2MnGe = 0.6041 nm and aMgO = 0.5957 nm). At a substrate temperature Tsub > 673 K, the formation of epitaxial films has been reported [331] with the optimum growth temperature to be Tsub = 773 K for the L21 phase formation. For an epitaxialRu2MnGe/Febilayer. The mean blocking temperature <TB> is measured to be 126 K using the York protocol [351].First principle calculations with advanced classical spin model simulations support the Ru-based bilayers to show exchangebias for the L21 phase [352]. Due to the strong FM coupling between the interface atoms, the Fe and Mn spins are oriented nearly parallel in the vicinity of their interface, and the direction of these spins is in-plane following the in-plane magnetic anisotropy. The results confirm that the Ru-based Heusler alloys should be in the L21 phase to exhibit AF behaviour. In order to increase the AF anisotropy and the resulting exchangebiasHex induced in the neighbouring FM layer, calculations suggest that tetragonal distortion (stretching) can induce large uniaxial anisotropy in Ru2MnZ due to a combined effect of symmetry breaking and spin-orbit coupling. A similar AF behaviour has been reported for the other heavy-metal-based Heusler alloys, such asPt2MnGa [340]. Therefore, for the heavy-metal-based Heusler alloys, high-moment element, e.g., Mn, is necessary to induce AF behaviour. The AF anisotropy can be increased by introducing tetragonal distortion, leading to RT AF behaviour.
Transition-metal-based Heusler alloys
Ni2MnAl films grown on MgO(001) have been reported to form the L21 and B2 phase for 873 K and RT growth, respectively [337]. Only the latter phase exhibits the exchangebias onto a neighbouring FM layer with <TB> ≤100 K. Since the Ni2MnAl layer has a number of crystalline defects causing the random distribution of crystalline boundaries, the formation of a larger grain size may be required to increase thermal stability for RT antiferromagnetism.Atomistic calculations confirm that no exchangebias occurs [353], however, a partially disordered B2 phase, a small Hex has been found, which agrees with experiments as described above. Here, the disorder leads to uncompensated spin structures along the interface. Since the corresponding magnetic anisotropy is rather low (an order of magnitude smaller than that for the Ru-based Heusler alloys), Hex is rather small and depends on the grain volume. It is furthermore rather unstable against thermal fluctuations with a maximum TB of below 100 K as agreed with the experiment. Therefore, the Heusler alloys based with a transition metal with a small magnetic moment exhibits their AF phase when the high-moment Y atoms form antiparallel configuration between their second-nearest neighbours.
High-moment-metal-based Heusler alloys
As a Heusler alloy based with a transition metal with a high moment, Mn2VAl films have been grown onto MgO(001) single-crystalline substrates with forming the L21 and A2 phase for Tsub ≥ 773 and ≤673 K, respectively. By depositing polycrystallineMn2VAl/Febilayer, Hex of 120 Oe at 10 K has been measured [341], corresponding to <TB> ~75 K.Polarised neutron reflectivity (PNR) measurements confirmed the presence of an AF phase at RT in a polycrystalline A2-ordered Mn2VAl bulk sample. The Mn2VAl film deposited at 673 K is similarly found to show AF A2 phase at RT, while those deposited at RT and 873 K show the A2 phase without AF ordering and the L21 phase, respectively [336].The ordered Mn2VAlalloy has a FI ground state stabilised by a rather large V moment-oriented antiparallel to an Mn moment. According to atomistic calculations, the disorder between the V and Al atoms does not influence significantly the magnetic state ascompared to the ordered L21 state. The fully disordered A2 phase is also studied as a random three-component alloy in terms of single-site coherent potential approximation (CPA), showing NM. Only by increasing the lattice parameter by more than 8%, a spontaneous FM state has been formed. The failure of obtaining an AF ground state (in fact, a magnetic ground state) at the experimental lattice constant indicates that magnetism collapses when a homogeneous atomic disorder is supposed like with the CPA and, most possibly, atomic short-range order (e.g., clustering of Mn atoms) would stabilise the magnetic order in the system.For the Mn-based Heusler alloys, off-stoichiometric compositions have also been investigated, which confirms the robustness of the Mn-based alloys against their atomic disorder. By taking two FI Heusler alloys, Mn3Ga and Mn2PtGa, their compensation point, Mn2.4Pt0.6Ga, has been calculated and demonstrated experimentally [345].By further substituting Y elements with Mn, binaryHeusler alloys can be formed. One example is hexagonalMn3Ge [343]. Hex of up to 520 Oe is measured at the boundaries between AF and FM domains. A tetragonal Mn3Ga film has then been investigated to induce AF behaviour [339]. A bilayer of epitaxial Mn3Ga (10 nm)/Co0.9Fe0.1 (2.5 nm) is reported to show Hex of 1.5 kOe at RT. Magnetic anisotropy energy and <TB> are estimated to be 3 × 106 erg/cm3 and ~400 K, respectively. Recently, Hex of 430 Oe at 120 K in polycrystalline Mn3Ga/Co0.6Fe0.4 bilayers, confirming the applicability of such binaryHeusler alloys for a device [341]. Similar off-stoichiometric AF Heusler alloys are reported asFe2VAl [348,349] and Cr2MnSb [169].By further expanding the definition of the Heusler alloys to nitrides [330], MnN has been investigated. MnN films are grown using ultrahigh vacuum sputtering in N2 atmosphere to achieve Mn:N = 1:1. A MnN/Febilayer has been reported to show Hex of 1.4 kOe at RT with <TB> = 388 K [347]. However, the minimum thickness of MnN to induce the AF behaviour is 20 nm, which needs to be at least halved to be competitive against the 6-nm-thick Ir-Mn layer used in spintronic devices.Therefore, high-moment-metal-based Heusler alloys displayAF behaviour possibly due to the clustering of the high-moment metals even in their disordered A2 phase. Magnetic anisotropy is demonstrated to be increased by introducing tetragonal distortion into the unit cell of the alloys. Further engineering in distortion and AF domain size can increase <TB> and Hex of these alloys, allowing the replacement for Ir-Mn alloys used in spintronic devices.
Major characterisations techniques of antiferromagnetic Heusler alloys
Electrical resistivity
For the Néel temperature measurement, the temperature dependence of electrical resistivity has been utilised to determine TN by detecting its gradient change [354]. Above TN, the moment alignment becomes random in the AF materials and changes the corresponding resistivity. As an example, a single-crystal of Cr with dimensions 5 × 5 × 1 mm3 has been measured to confirm the applicability of the resistivity measurements to determine TN in a thin-film form [325]. A clear minimum of the order of µΩ is observed in the resistivity at 311 K. Measuring this change is only possible due to the low resistance of the crystal, e.g., 100-nm-thick epitaxialNi2MnAl films grown at elevating temperature [337].
X-ray magnetic linear dichroism
In order to characterise the AF materials microscopically, synchrotron radiation has been widely employed. X-ray magnetic linear dichroism (XMLD) utilises a pair of linearly polarised soft X-ray beams with perpendicular polarisation axes, which is different from a pair of circularly polarised beams used in XMCD as described in Sec. 4.4. Here, XMCD signals are proportional to the average value of a magnetic moment in a domain (), while XMLD signals are proportional to . For an AF material, is zero as MA = – MB within an AF domain in Eq. (2), resulting in no XMCD signal. However, is a finite value for an AF material, allowing AF domain imaging. For example for an Fe/NiObilayer, NiO domain structures have been observed by taking a Ni L-edge, which is stronglyaffected by the exchangecoupling between Fe and NiO (spin image), and by taking the O K-edge, which is originated from the intrinsic AF anisotropy due to the strong coupling with the Ni 3d orbital (twin image) [355]. For these domain imaging, a large uniform domain (>a few µm) is required, which makes it difficult to be used for an AF thin films.
Polarised neutron reflection
Polarised neutron reflectivity (PNR) is another synchrotron-based technique to determine magnetic properties of bulk and layered materials [356]. Due to the magnetic moment of neutron beam interacting with magnetic materials to be observed, not only layer structures, such as thickness, density, composition and interfacial roughness, but also in-plane magnetic moments can be measured. The former structural analysis is similar to X-ray reflectivity (XRR) measurements but with higher accuracy in a shorter scanning period (<1 min.). The latter magnetic information can be obtained by detecting the neutron reflection with its spins interacted with those in an AF and/or FM layers.
Applications of antiferromagnetic Heusler alloys
AF Heusler alloys are extremely attractive due to the absence of rare, expensive or toxic materials in their composition. Furthermore, they are fullycompatible with other FM and NM Heusler alloys, with small lattice mismatches, largeconduction band overlap and similar interfacial properties. Therefore, AF Heusler alloys are suitable for a wide range of applications, both for AF spintronics or as pinning layers in traditional spintronic devices.A recent work by Nayak et al. has shown experimentally the existence of the anti-skyrmion in a tetragonal Heusler alloy Mn1.4Pt0.9Pd0.1Sn with the D2d symmetry [357]. Lorentz TEM was used to observe the formation of this new class of skyrmion, which is an alternating form of the previously observed Bloch and Néel skyrmions. These structures are stable at above RT in the presence of a small field (0.2 T) and can be meta-stabilised at lower temperatures in the absence of an applied field.AF Heusler alloys have attracted great attention in the storage industryas a viable material for read/write heads and for ultra-low damping MRAM. All-Heusler GMR devices have been realised [358], these are yet to reach the necessary MR characteristics and Heusler alloy devices with non-Heusler alloy spacer layers require conditions which are not back-end-of-line (BEOL) compatible. However, many magnetoresistive properties could potentially be realised in an all-Heusler exchange-biased GMR/TMR device. The potential for half-metallic antiferromagnets [359-361] which will have lattice and energy-band matching to the rest of the device stack mean that AF Heusler alloys are an exciting avenue for device applications.AF spintronics is one of the key avenues of investigation for the improvement of spintronic devices [362,363]: Increases in device density due to zero stray fields, radiation hardness against magnetic interference and ultra-fast magnetisation dynamics. These advantages indicate that AF spintronics can exceed the potential of conventional spintronics. Heusler alloys provide an exciting avenue within this new area due to their desirable properties. More specifically, it is the compensated ferromagnetic Heusler alloys, such as Mn3Ga, which are of key interest [345,364].The D022 tetragonalHeusler alloys can be tuned compositionally to be fullycompensated. The advantages of this are that the dipole field is zero even at the atomic scale. Furthermore, with the tetragonalHeusler alloys the high TC -500 K means that the magnetic order is thermally robust. With Mn-Fe-Ga alloys exchangebias fields of greater than 3 T have been established, further paving the way for application in both ferro- and antiferromagnetic spintronics.
Non-magnetic Heusler alloys
Topological insulators
Topological insulators are one of the Dirac materials which have a topological nontrivial band structure leading to unique quantum phenomena [365]. For example, Qi et al. have studied on a topological insulator -Bi4I4 by applying high pressure in order to obtain the quasi-one-dimension [366]. Hybrid functional method has been used to calculate the electronic properties to prevent the underestimated band gap within the local density approximation or generalised gradient approximation. The simulations show a weak interaction between the along the AГYM path and strong dispersion along the BГ direction indicates a strong interaction within the chain. Therefore, quasi-1D characteristics of -Bi4I4 are confirmed. Density functional theory calculations show that electronic instability occurs at a critical pressure of 11.5 GPa. An experimental study on resistivityas a function of pressure shows a direct relationship between the resistivity and the bandgap stage (open or close). The resistivity decreases rapidly above the critical pressure and superconductivity is observed in -Bi4I4.A topological surface state has been reported in LuPtBi and YPtBi [369]. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements confirmed the formation of a topological phase with a clear Dirac point at the Г position, which has been supported by ab initio calculations. Similar properties have been reported in ZrIrZ (Z = As, Sb or Bi) [368,369]. Experimental study and theoretical calculation have been carried out to investigate the structural and magnetotransport properties of LuNiBisingle crystals [370]. Further investigation on a topological state in Heusler alloys may be required for the search for a robust topological insulator.
Spin gap-less semiconductors
Some Heusler alloys have been studied due to the unique property such as spin-gapless semiconductor (SGS). This novel material was first proposal by Wang et al. [371]. There are four possible band structures with spin gapless features as shown in Figure 13. These Heusler alloys have potential applications in spintronic devices because of their unique transport properties. For instance, almost no threshold energy is required to excite electrons from the valence to conduction band, the excited electrons have spin polarisation of 100%. Several SGS Heusler alloys such asFe2CoSi [372], Mn2CoAl [373-374] CoFeCrGa [375] and Zr2MnGa [376] have been studied.
Figure 13.
Four possible energy band structures for spin gapless semiconductors with parabolic dispersion energy against momentum [382]
Four possible energy band structures for spin gapless semiconductors with parabolic dispersion energy against momentum [382]More than 10 FeRu-based quaternaryHeusler alloys have been studied by Guo et al. [378-380]. FeRuCrSi is predicted to be a spin gap-less semiconductor with 100% spin polarisation. The total magnetic moment is calculated to be 2.0 μB [377]. Type-II ScMnVGa is a spin gap-less semiconductor in Mn-based Heusler alloys. The absence of a magnetic moment is calculated for ScMnVGa, which represents antiferromagnetic behaviour. This calculation is achieved using first principles calculations based on density functional theory [378] .Xu et al. conducted detailed analysis on the magnetic properties of stoichiometric Mn2CoAlHeusler alloys. Saturation magnetisation at 5 K of the annealed stoichiometric and Co-rich Mn2CoAl samples are measured to be 2.6 and 2.5 μB/f.u. respectively [379]. Bainsla et al. studied the magnetic behaviour of CoFeCrGa with high Curie Temperature of 620 K [380]. The saturation magnetisation of ≈ 2.1 μB/f.u. is measured under zero applied pressure [375]. This value was in good agreement of Ms = 2.0 μB based on the generalised Slater-Pauling rule [65]. Fu et al. also studied magnetic properties of CoFeMnSi [381], as it has been predicted as a half-metallic ferromagnetic material [383]. The saturation magnetisation and coercivity are measured to be 98.6 emu/g (= 3.49 μB/f.u.) and less than 25 Oe, respectively. The SGS Heusler alloys show ferromagnetic behaviour and exhibit soft magnetic behaviour.These SGS Heusler alloy films have been used as a ferromagnetic layer in MTJs. For example, CoFeCrAl acts as a ferromagnetic layer in MTJ, showing 87% TMRratio at RT [384]. Thin film sample is grown using magnetron sputtering technique, followed by post-annealing at Tanneal = 1,073 K. Cross-sectional TEM is performed to characterise the CoFeCrAl structure. Nanobeam diffraction confirms the chemical ordering of CoFeCrAlas shown in Figure 14(a) with veryfew interfacial dislocations. As discussed in Section 5.4., the TMRratio of MTJ depends on various factors at the interface between ferromagnetic and insulator layers, such as the interface roughness and lattice mismatch [12]. The smooth interface induces a reasonably largeTMRratio. The diffraction spots of CoFeCrAl(002) and (004) are obtained, indicating that the CoFeCrAl exhibits the B2 (instead of L21) ordering which agreed with the XRD data [384].
Figure 14.
Cross-sectional TEM image of MTJ consisting of CoFeCrAl/MgO/CoFe and NiCrMnSi annealed at 973 K. Nanobeam diffraction patterns are also taken to confirm the crystalline ordering. Samples were grown by Mizukami et al. See Ref. [384] for details
Cross-sectional TEM image of MTJ consisting of CoFeCrAl/MgO/CoFe and NiCrMnSi annealed at 973 K. Nanobeam diffraction patterns are also taken to confirm the crystalline ordering. Samples were grown by Mizukami et al. See Ref. [384] for detailsAs another example, NiCrMnSi is used to examine the change of crystallinity using different annealing temperatures. Figure 14(b) shows cross-sectional TEM and the corresponding fast Fourier transformation (FFT) images NiCrMnSi is deposited on a MgO(001) substrate, followed by in-situ annealing at Tsub = 973 K. Diffraction pattern is also observed as an inset in Figure 14(b), indicating NiCrMnSicrystallisation.
Conclusion and future perspectives
The structural and magnetic properties of Heusler alloy films are explained from the viewpoint of spintronic applications. The crystallographical manipulation as well as spin-structural controllability can be achieved in the films byconstituent element substitution. Recent progress in the film growth techniques enables the formation of almost perfectly ordered Heusler alloys. Localatomic disordering in the vicinity of theirs interface and surfaces prevents to achieve half-metallic electron transport at RT, which has been theoretically predicted for a bulk Heusler alloy. In order to achieve such surface asymmetry, first principles calculations and materials informatics using available databases [385],[386] have been employed to seek relevant combinations of interfacial atomic bonding, a surface termination and a crystalline orientation. Such an atomicallycontrolled Heusler film is highly required for the use as a spin source for future spintronic devices.
Authors: S Ikeda; K Miura; H Yamamoto; K Mizunuma; H D Gan; M Endo; S Kanai; J Hayakawa; F Matsukura; H Ohno Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2010-07-11 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Jaewoo Jeong; Yari Ferrante; Sergey V Faleev; Mahesh G Samant; Claudia Felser; Stuart S P Parkin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Z K Liu; L X Yang; S-C Wu; C Shekhar; J Jiang; H F Yang; Y Zhang; S-K Mo; Z Hussain; B Yan; C Felser; Y L Chen Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 14.919