Literature DB >> 33828141

Proteomic comparison between different tissue preservation methods for identification of promising biomarkers of urothelial bladder cancer.

Alberto Valdés1,2, Athanasios Bitzios1, Eszter Kassa1, Ganna Shevchenko1, Alexander Falk1, Per-Uno Malmström3, Anca Dragomir4,5, Ulrika Segersten3, Sara Bergström Lind6.   

Abstract

Samples in biobanks are generally preserved by formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding (FFPE) and/or optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT)-embedding and subsequently frozen. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based analysis of these samples is now available via developed protocols, however, the differences in results with respect to preservation methods needs further investigation. Here we use bladder urothelial carcinoma tissue of two different tumor stages (Ta/T1-non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), and T2/T3-muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)) which, upon sampling, were divided and preserved by FFPE and OCT. Samples were parallel processed from the two methods and proteins were analyzed with label-free quantitative MS. Over 700 and 1200 proteins were quantified in FFPE and OCT samples, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicates that the preservation method is the main source of variation, but also tumors of different stages could be differentiated. Proteins involved in mitochondrial function were overrepresented in OCT data but missing in the FFPE data, indicating that these proteins are not well preserved by FFPE. Concordant results for proteins such as HMGCS2 (uniquely quantified in Ta/T1 tumors), and LGALS1, ANXA5 and plastin (upregulated in T2/T3 tumors) were observed in both FFPE and OCT data, which supports the use of MS technology for biobank samples and encourages the further evaluation of these proteins as biomarkers.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828141     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  38 in total

Review 1.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics and network biology.

Authors:  Ariel Bensimon; Albert J R Heck; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Proteome, phosphoproteome, and N-glycoproteome are quantitatively preserved in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and analyzable by high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Paweł Ostasiewicz; Dorota F Zielinska; Matthias Mann; Jacek R Wiśniewski
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Comprehensive proteome analysis of fresh frozen and optimal cutting temperature (OCT) embedded primary non-small cell lung carcinoma by LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Shingo Sakashita; Paul Taylor; Ming S Tsao; Michael F Moran
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 4.  Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications.

Authors:  John R Yates; Cristian I Ruse; Aleksey Nakorchevsky
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Parallel Proteomic Workflow for Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Tissue Samples Preserved by Different Methods.

Authors:  Aleš Holfeld; Alberto Valdés; Per-Uno Malmström; Ulrika Segersten; Sara Bergström Lind
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Filter-Aided Sample Preparation: The Versatile and Efficient Method for Proteomic Analysis.

Authors:  J R Wiśniewski
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Social network architecture of human immune cells unveiled by quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Jan C Rieckmann; Roger Geiger; Daniel Hornburg; Tobias Wolf; Ksenya Kveler; David Jarrossay; Federica Sallusto; Shai S Shen-Orr; Antonio Lanzavecchia; Matthias Mann; Felix Meissner
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 25.606

8.  Inhibition of protein carbamylation in urea solution using ammonium-containing buffers.

Authors:  Shisheng Sun; Jian-Ying Zhou; Weiming Yang; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.365

9.  A novel strategy based on histological protein profiling in-silico for identifying potential biomarkers in urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  M Ulrika Segersten; E Karolina Edlund; Patrick Micke; Manuel de la Torre; Hans Hamberg; Asa E L Edvinsson; Sandra E C Andersson; Per-Uno Malmström; H Kenneth Wester
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Applications of mass spectrometry for quantitative protein analysis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Carine Steiner; Axel Ducret; Jean-Christophe Tille; Marlene Thomas; Thomas A McKee; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Alexander Scherl; Pierre Lescuyer; Paul Cutler
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.984

View more
  2 in total

1.  An Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis towards the Identification of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Key Biomarkers for Urinary Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Michail Sarafidis; George I Lambrou; Vassilis Zoumpourlis; Dimitrios Koutsouris
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Proteomics for Early Detection of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Clinically Useful Urine Protein Biomarkers.

Authors:  Jae-Hak Ahn; Chan-Koo Kang; Eun-Mee Kim; Ah-Ram Kim; Aram Kim
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.