Literature DB >> 33828122

An order independent algorithm for inferring gene regulatory network using quantile value for conditional independence tests.

Sayyed Hadi Mahmoodi1, Rosa Aghdam2,3, Changiz Eslahchi4,5.   

Abstract

In recent years, due to the difficulty and inefficiency of experimental methods, numerous computational methods have been introduced for inferring the structure of Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs). The Path Consistency (PC) algorithm is one of the popular methods to infer the structure of GRNs. However, this group of methods still has limitations and there is a potential for improvements in this field. For example, the PC-based algorithms are still sensitive to the ordering of nodes i.e. different node orders results in different network structures. The second is that the networks inferred by these methods are highly dependent on the threshold used for independence testing. Also, it is still a challenge to select the set of conditional genes in an optimal way, which affects the performance and computation complexity of the PC-based algorithm. We introduce a novel algorithm, namely Order Independent PC-based algorithm using Quantile value (OIPCQ), which improves the accuracy of the learning process of GRNs and solves the order dependency issue. The quantile-based thresholds are considered for different orders of CMI tests. For conditional gene selection, we consider the paths between genes with length equal or greater than 2 while other well-known PC-based methods only consider the paths of length 2. We applied OIPCQ on the various networks of the DREAM3 and DREAM4 in silico challenges. As a real-world case study, we used OIPCQ to reconstruct SOS DNA network obtained from Escherichia coli and GRN for acute myeloid leukemia based on the RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The results show that OIPCQ produces the same network structure for all the permutations of the genes and improves the resulted GRN through accurately quantifying the causal regulation strength in comparison with other well-known PC-based methods. According to the GRN constructed by OIPCQ, for acute myeloid leukemia, two regulators BCLAF1 and NRSF reported previously are significantly important. However, the highest degree nodes in this GRN are ZBTB7A and PU1 which play a significant role in cancer, especially in leukemia. OIPCQ is freely accessible at https://github.com/haammim/OIPCQ-and-OIPCQ2 .

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828122     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87074-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  44 in total

1.  Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data.

Authors:  N Friedman; M Linial; I Nachman; D Pe'er
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles.

Authors:  T R Hughes; M J Marton; A R Jones; C J Roberts; R Stoughton; C D Armour; H A Bennett; E Coffey; H Dai; Y D He; M J Kidd; A M King; M R Meyer; D Slade; P Y Lum; S B Stepaniants; D D Shoemaker; D Gachotte; K Chakraburtty; J Simon; M Bard; S H Friend
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Advantages and limitations of current network inference methods.

Authors:  Riet De Smet; Kathleen Marchal
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Revealing strengths and weaknesses of methods for gene network inference.

Authors:  Daniel Marbach; Robert J Prill; Thomas Schaffter; Claudio Mattiussi; Dario Floreano; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A review on the computational approaches for gene regulatory network construction.

Authors:  Lian En Chai; Swee Kuan Loh; Swee Thing Low; Mohd Saberi Mohamad; Safaai Deris; Zalmiyah Zakaria
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  NARROMI: a noise and redundancy reduction technique improves accuracy of gene regulatory network inference.

Authors:  Xiujun Zhang; Keqin Liu; Zhi-Ping Liu; Béatrice Duval; Jean-Michel Richer; Xing-Ming Zhao; Jin-Kao Hao; Luonan Chen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Gene network inference and visualization tools for biologists: application to new human transcriptome datasets.

Authors:  Daniel Hurley; Hiromitsu Araki; Yoshinori Tamada; Ben Dunmore; Deborah Sanders; Sally Humphreys; Muna Affara; Seiya Imoto; Kaori Yasuda; Yuki Tomiyasu; Kosuke Tashiro; Christopher Savoie; Vicky Cho; Stephen Smith; Satoru Kuhara; Satoru Miyano; D Stephen Charnock-Jones; Edmund J Crampin; Cristin G Print
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  How to infer gene networks from expression profiles.

Authors:  Mukesh Bansal; Vincenzo Belcastro; Alberto Ambesi-Impiombato; Diego di Bernardo
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference.

Authors:  Daniel Marbach; James C Costello; Robert Küffner; Nicole M Vega; Robert J Prill; Diogo M Camacho; Kyle R Allison; Manolis Kellis; James J Collins; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  IPCA-CMI: an algorithm for inferring gene regulatory networks based on a combination of PCA-CMI and MIT score.

Authors:  Rosa Aghdam; Mojtaba Ganjali; Changiz Eslahchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.