Literature DB >> 33827705

Adaptation of a quality improvement approach to implement eScreening in VHA healthcare settings: innovative use of the Lean Six Sigma Rapid Process Improvement Workshop.

James O E Pittman1,2,3,4, Borsika Rabin5,6,7, Erin Almklov5, Niloofar Afari5,8,9, Elizabeth Floto10, Eusebio Rodriguez9, Laurie Lindamer5,8,9,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed a comprehensive mobile screening technology (eScreening) that provides customized and automated self-report health screening via mobile tablet for veterans seen in VHA settings. There is agreement about the value of health technology, but limited knowledge of how best to broadly implement and scale up health technologies. Quality improvement (QI) methods may offer solutions to overcome barriers related to broad scale implementation of technology in health systems. We aimed to develop a process guide for eScreening implementation in VHA clinics to automate self-report screening of mental health symptoms and psychosocial challenges.
METHODS: This was a two-phase, mixed methods implementation project building on an adapted quality improvement method. In phase one, we adapted and conducted an RPIW to develop a generalizable process guide for eScreening implementation (eScreening Playbook). In phase two, we integrated the eScreening Playbook and RPIW with additional strategies of training and facilitation to create a multicomponent implementation strategy (MCIS) for eScreening. We then piloted the MCIS in two VHA sites. Quantitative eScreening pre-implementation survey data and qualitative implementation process "mini interviews" were collected from individuals at each of the two sites who participated in the implementation process. Survey data were characterized using descriptive statistics, and interview data were independently coded using a rapid qualitative analytic approach.
RESULTS: Pilot data showed overall satisfaction and usefulness of our MCIS approach and identified some challenges, solutions, and potential adaptations across sites. Both sites used the components of the MCIS, but site 2 elected not to include the RPIW. Survey data revealed positive responses related to eScreening from staff at both sites. Interview data exposed implementation challenges related to the technology, support, and education at both sites. Workflow and staffing resource challenges were only reported by site 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Our use of RPIW and other QI methods to both develop a playbook and an implementation strategy for eScreening has created a testable implementation process to employ automated, patient-facing assessment. The efficient collection and communication of patient information have the potential to greatly improve access to and quality of healthcare.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic screening; Implementation; Quality improvement; RPIW; eScreening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33827705     DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00132-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Implement Sci Commun        ISSN: 2662-2211


  8 in total

1.  A Framework for Disseminating Clinical Best Practices in the VA Health System.

Authors:  Shereef M Elnahal; Carolyn M Clancy; David J Shulkin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  VA eScreening program: Technology to improve care for post-9/11 veterans.

Authors:  James O E Pittman; Elizabeth Floto; Laurie Lindamer; Dewleen G Baker; James B Lohr; Niloofar Afari
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2017-02

3.  Application of lean methods improves surgical clinic experience.

Authors:  John H T Waldhausen; Jeffrey R Avansino; Arlene Libby; Robert S Sawin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Enhancing outreach for persons with serious mental illness: 12-month results from a cluster randomized trial of an adaptive implementation strategy.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Daniel Almirall; David E Goodrich; Zongshan Lai; Kristen M Abraham; Kristina M Nord; Nicholas W Bowersox
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.

Authors:  Byron J Powell; Thomas J Waltz; Matthew J Chinman; Laura J Damschroder; Jeffrey L Smith; Monica M Matthieu; Enola K Proctor; JoAnn E Kirchner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update).

Authors:  Jamie Ross; Fiona Stevenson; Rosa Lau; Elizabeth Murray
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Using implementation facilitation to foster clinical practice quality and adherence to evidence in challenged settings: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mona J Ritchie; Louise E Parker; Carrie N Edlund; JoAnn E Kirchner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Implementing eScreening technology in four VA clinics: a mixed-method study.

Authors:  James O E Pittman; Niloofar Afari; Elizabeth Floto; Erin Almklov; Susan Conner; Borsika Rabin; Laurie Lindamer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.