Literature DB >> 33827525

Prostatic urethral lift (UroLift): a real-world analysis of outcomes using hospital episodes statistics.

Toby Page1, Rajan Veeratterapillay2, Kim Keltie2,3, Julie Burn2, Andrew Sims2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine real-world outcomes of prostatic urethral lift (UroLift) procedures conducted in hospitals across England.
METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort was identified from Hospital Episode Statistics data including men undergoing UroLift in hospitals in England between 2017 and 2020. Procedure uptake, patient demographics, inpatient complications, 30-day accident and emergency re-attendance rate, requirement for further treatment and catheterization were captured. Kaplan-Meier and hazard analysis were used to analyse time to re-treatment.
RESULTS: 2942 index UroLift procedures from 80 hospital trusts were analysed; 85.3% conducted as day-case surgery (admitted to hospital for a planned surgical procedure and returning home on the same day). In-hospital complication rate was 3.4%. 93% of men were catheter-free at 30 days. The acute accident and emergency attendance rate within 30 days was 12.0%. Results of Kaplan Meier analysis for subsequent re-treatment (including additional UroLift and endoscopic intervention) at 1 and 2 years were 5.2% [95% CI 4.2 to 6.1] and 11.9% [10.1 to 13.6] respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis of UroLift shows that it can be delivered safely in a day-case setting with minimal morbidity. However, hospital resource usage for catheterization and emergency hospital attendance in the first 30 days was substantial, and 12% required re-treatment at 2 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPH; LUTS; Prostatic urethral lift; Urinary retention; UroLift

Year:  2021        PMID: 33827525     DOI: 10.1186/s12894-021-00824-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Urol        ISSN: 1471-2490            Impact factor:   2.264


  1 in total

1.  Three year results of the prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study.

Authors:  Claus G Roehrborn; Daniel B Rukstalis; Jack Barkin; Steven N Gange; Neal D Shore; Jonathan L Giddens; Damien M Bolton; Barrett E Cowan; Anthony L Cantwell; Kevin T McVary; Alexis E Te; Shahram S Gholami; William G Moseley; Peter T Chin; William T Dowling; Sheldon J Freedman; Peter F Incze; K Scott Coffield; Fernando D Borges; Prem Rashid
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.344

  1 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Office-Based Procedures for BPH.

Authors:  Bruce Gao; Steven Lu; Naeem Bhojani; Kevin C Zorn; Bilal Chughtai; Dean Elterman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Salvage versus primary holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: trends, outcomes and safety analysis.

Authors:  Adri M Durant; Jonathan Moore; Sandeep Voleti; Sarah Wu; Lanyu Mi; Gopal Narang; Scott Cheney; Mitchell Humphreys
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.