Literature DB >> 33827037

Effects of rTMS on the brain: is there value in variability?

Mitchell R Goldsworthy1, Brenton Hordacre2, John C Rothwell3, Michael C Ridding2.   

Abstract

The ability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to non-invasively induce neuroplasticity in the human cortex has opened exciting possibilities for its application in both basic and clinical research. Changes in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation has so far provided a convenient model for exploring the neurophysiology of rTMS effects on the brain, influencing the ways in which these stimulation protocols have been applied therapeutically. However, a growing number of studies have reported large inter-individual variability in the mean MEP response to rTMS, raising legitimate questions about the usefulness of this model for guiding therapy. Although the increasing application of different neuroimaging approaches has made it possible to probe rTMS-induced neuroplasticity outside the motor cortex to measure changes in neural activity that impact other aspects of human behaviour, the high variability of rTMS effects on these measurements remains an important issue for the field to address. In this review, we seek to move away from the conventional facilitation/inhibition dichotomy that permeates much of the rTMS literature, presenting a non-standard approach for measuring rTMS-induced neuroplasticity. We consider the evidence that rTMS is able to modulate an individual's moment-to-moment variability of neural activity, and whether this could have implications for guiding the therapeutic application of rTMS.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor evoked potential; Neuroimaging; Neuroplasticity; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Variability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33827037     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  4 in total

1.  Facilitation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Response to a Modified 30 Hz Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Protocol in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Katarina Hosel; François Tremblay
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-12

2.  Decoding personalized motor cortical excitability states from human electroencephalography.

Authors:  Sara J Hussain; Romain Quentin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Qingqing Zhao; Hong Li; Yu Liu; Haonan Mei; Liying Guo; Xianying Liu; Xiaolin Tao; Jiang Ma
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Adding a Second iTBS Block in 15 or 60 Min Time Interval Does Not Increase iTBS Effects on Motor Cortex Excitability and the Responder Rates.

Authors:  Ilya Bakulin; Alfiia Zabirova; Dmitry Sinitsyn; Alexandra Poydasheva; Dmitry Lagoda; Natalia Suponeva; Michael Piradov
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.