Literature DB >> 33826716

Machine Learning for the Prediction of Molecular Markers in Glioma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anne Jian1,2, Kevin Jang1,3, Maurizio Manuguerra4, Sidong Liu1,5, John Magnussen1,6, Antonio Di Ieva1,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Molecular characterization of glioma has implications for prognosis, treatment planning, and prediction of treatment response. Current histopathology is limited by intratumoral heterogeneity and variability in detection methods. Advances in computational techniques have led to interest in mining quantitative imaging features to noninvasively detect genetic mutations.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning (ML) models in molecular subtyping gliomas on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: A systematic search was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines to identify studies up to April 1, 2020. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. Diagnostic performance estimates were obtained using a bivariate model and heterogeneity was explored using metaregression.
RESULTS: Forty-four original articles were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation in training datasets were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.91) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.91), respectively, and 0.83 to 0.85 in validation sets. Use of data augmentation and MRI sequence type were weakly associated with heterogeneity. Both O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation and 1p/19q codeletion could be predicted with a pooled sensitivity and specificity between 0.76 and 0.83 in training datasets.
CONCLUSION: ML application to preoperative MRI demonstrated promising results for predicting IDH mutation, MGMT methylation, and 1p/19q codeletion in glioma. Optimized ML models could lead to a noninvasive, objective tool that captures molecular information important for clinical decision making. Future studies should use multicenter data, external validation and investigate clinical feasibility of ML models. © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Genetic markers; Glioma; MRI; Machine learning; Radiomics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33826716     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

1.  T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch sign in lower grade gliomas: correlation with pathological and molecular findings.

Authors:  Shinji Yamashita; Hideo Takeshima; Yoshihito Kadota; Minako Azuma; Tsuyoshi Fukushima; Natsuki Ogasawara; Tomoki Kawano; Mitsuru Tamura; Jyunichiro Muta; Kiyotaka Saito; Go Takeishi; Asako Mizuguchi; Takashi Watanabe; Hajime Ohta; Kiyotaka Yokogami
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 2.  Application of artificial intelligence and radiomics in pituitary neuroendocrine and sellar tumors: a quantitative and qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Kelvin Koong; Veronica Preda; Anne Jian; Benoit Liquet-Weiland; Antonio Di Ieva
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Efficient Prediction of Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Meningiomas on MRI: From Traditional Radiological Findings to a Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Yanjie Zhao; Jianfeng Xu; Boran Chen; Le Cao; Chaoyue Chen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Effect of 3D Slicer Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Guidance with Mobile Phone Virtual Reality Technology on Brain Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Xiaodong Li; Xueping Leng; Bo Zhong; Yanhong Liu; Liang Liu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.009

Review 5.  Preoperative Diagnosis and Molecular Characterization of Gliomas With Liquid Biopsy and Radiogenomics.

Authors:  Carmen Balana; Sara Castañer; Cristina Carrato; Teresa Moran; Assumpció Lopez-Paradís; Marta Domenech; Ainhoa Hernandez; Josep Puig
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 6.  Gaps and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence Applications for Pediatric Oncology in European Research: A Systematic Review of Reviews and a Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Eugenio Tozzi; Francesco Fabozzi; Megan Eckley; Ileana Croci; Vito Andrea Dell'Anna; Erica Colantonio; Angela Mastronuzzi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Brain Tumor Imaging: Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Muhammad Afridi; Abhi Jain; Mariam Aboian; Seyedmehdi Payabvash
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.875

8.  Use of deep learning in the MRI diagnosis of Chiari malformation type I.

Authors:  Kaishin W Tanaka; Carlo Russo; Sidong Liu; Marcus A Stoodley; Antonio Di Ieva
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.995

9.  Application of artificial intelligence in glioma researches: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Dewei Zhang; Weiyi Zhu; Jun Guo; Wei Chen; Xin Gu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

10.  Visualization of tumor heterogeneity and prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status for human gliomas using multiparametric physiologic and metabolic MRI.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Hiroyuki Tatekawa; Jingwen Yao; Catalina Raymond; Richard Everson; Kunal Patel; Sergey Mareninov; William H Yong; Noriko Salamon; Whitney B Pope; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.