| Literature DB >> 33826020 |
Sherif W Ayad1, Tarek H El Zawawy2, Mohamed I Lotfy2, Ahmed M Naguib2, Ahmed M El Amrawy2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Significance of totally occluded culprit coronary artery in patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is underestimated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence and impact of totally occluded culprit artery on in-hospital and 6 months follow-up outcomes of NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary total occlusion; Electrocardiography; Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
Year: 2021 PMID: 33826020 PMCID: PMC8026781 DOI: 10.1186/s43044-021-00160-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Egypt Heart J ISSN: 1110-2608
Baseline characteristics of the studied populations
| | 56.54 ± 9.437 | 59.09 ± 9.686 | 57.53 ± 9.57 | |||
| Male | 98 | 87.5% | 302 | 77.8% | 400 (80%) | |
| Female | 14 | 12.5% | 86 | 22.2% | 100 (20%) | |
| | 8 | 7.14% | 30 | 7.74% | 228 (45.6%) | |
| | 28 | 25% | 162 | 41.7% | ||
| 56 | 50% | 244 | 62.9% | 300 (60%) | ||
| | 62 | 55.3% | 172 | 44.3% | 234 (46.8%) | |
| | 18 | 16.1% | 30 | 7% | 48 (9.6%) | |
| 44 | 39.3% | 120 | 30.9% | 164 (32.8%) | ||
| 4 | 3.6% | 36 | 9.3% | 40 (8%) | ||
| 24 | 21% | 70 | 18% | 94 (18.8%) | ||
| 4 | 3.6% | 32 | 8.2% | 36 (7.2%) | ||
| 8 | 7.1% | 56 | 14.4% | 64 (12.8%) | ||
| Min.—Max. | 12–72 | 12–72 | MW | |||
| Mean ± SD. | 27.11 ± 10.651 | 28.73 ± 11.956 | ||||
| Median | 24 | 24 | ||||
| | 102 | 91.07% | 362 | 93.3% | MW | |
| | 6 | 5.4% | 18 | 4.6% | ||
| | 4 | 3.6% | 8 | 2.1% | ||
χ2 value for Chi square, t Student t-test, MW Mann-Whitney test, FEP Fisher’s exact significance
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Baseline ECG, echocardiography, and laboratory results of both groups
| Group 1 ( | Group 2 ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | ||
| Normal | 64 | 57.1 | 238 | 61.3 | |
| ST depression | 30 | 26.8 | 66 | 17.0 | |
| T-wave inversion | 8 | 12.5 | 56 | 14.4 | |
| Q waves | 2 | 1.8 | 22 | 5.7 | |
| Bundle branch | 2 | 1.8 | 6 | 1.5 | |
| Min.–Max. | 9.0–15.0 | 11.0–16.0 | t | ||
| Mean ± SD. | 13.20 ± 1.66 | 13.36 ± 1.44 | |||
| Median | 13.0 | 13.25 | |||
| Min.–Max. | 0.60–3.20 | 0.60–1.70 | MW | ||
| Mean ± SD. | 1.03 ± 0.50 | 0.95 ± 0.23 | |||
| Median | 0.90 | 0.95 | |||
| | 92.0000 | 35.0000 | |||
| | (5.0–125) | (5.5–116) | |||
| | 7.5000 | 1.5000 | * | ||
| | (0.5–35) | (0.5–45) | |||
| | |||||
| Min-Max (%) | 35–75 | 30–70 | |||
| Mean ± SD (%) | 58.64 ± 7.44 | 59.19 ± 7.616 | |||
| Median (%) | 60 | 60 | |||
| 52 | 46.4% | 140 | 36.1% | ||
| No | 92 | 82.1% | 310 | 79.9% | MW |
| Mild | 20 | 17.9% | 62 | 16% | |
| Moderate | 0 | 0% | 12 | 3.1% | |
| Severe | 0 | 0% | 4 | 1.5% | |
χ2 value for Chi square, t Student t-test, MW Mann-Whitney test
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
GRACE risk score and TIMI risk score at admission of the studied population
| Group 1 ( | Group2 ( | Test of significance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | |||
| Low (1–108) | 64 | 57.3 | 232 | 59.8 | ||
| Intermediate (109–140) | 40 | 35.7 | 114 | 31.9 | ||
| High (141–372) | 8 | 7 | 32 | 8.3 | ||
| Low (0–2) | 20 | 17.8 | 80 | 20.6 | ||
| Intermediate (3–5) | 82 | 73.3 | 268 | 69.1 | ||
| High (>5) | 10 | 8.9 | 40 | 10.3 | ||
χ2 value for Chi square, MC Monte Carlo test
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Procedural characteristics of the studied population
| Group 1 | Group 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of diseased vessels | |||||
| One vessel CAD | 32 | 28.6% | 160 | 41.2% | X2p=0.218 |
| Two vessel CAD | 52 | 46.4% | 154 | 39.7% | |
| Three vessel CAD | 28 | 25% | 74 | 19.1% | |
| Culprit vessel | |||||
| LAD | 24 | 21.4% | 206 | 53.1% | X2p=<0.001 |
| LCX | 62 | 55.4% | 154 | 25.8% | |
| RCA | 26 | 23.2% | 74 | 21.1% | |
| Site of the lesion | |||||
| Proximal | 28 | 50% | 95 | 48.9% | X2p=0.23 |
| Mid | 20 | 35.7% | 74 | 37.2% | |
| Distal | 8 | 14.3% | 25 | 13.9% | |
| TIMI pre procedure | |||||
| 0 | 112 | 100% | 0 | 0 % | X2p =<0.001 |
| I | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 % | |
| II | 0 | 0% | 64 | 16.5% | |
| III | 0 | 0% | 324 | 83.5% | |
| Use of GP IIa–IIIb antagonists | 26 | 23% | 14 | 3 | |
| Collaterals | 82 | 73.2% | 18 | 4.6% | X2p =<0.01 |
| TIMI III post procedure | 110 | 98.2% | 384 | 98.9% | |
| Syntax score | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 11.68 ± 6.05 | 6.79 ± 3.24 | MWp =0.12 | ||
| Median | 10 | 7.0 | |||
| Min–Max | 4.0–24.0 | 4.0–22.0 | |||
| Residual syntax score | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 1.27 ± 2.67 | 0.66 ± 2.35 | MWp=0.07 | ||
| Median | 0 | 0 | |||
| Min–Max | 0–15 | 0–20 | |||
χ2 value for Chi square, MW Mann-Whitney test
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
In-hospital outcomes of the studied population
| Group 1 ( | Group 2 ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | ||
| 10 | 8.9 | 4 | 1 | *FE | |
| AF | 4 | 3.5 | 2 | 0.5 | |
| VF | 6 | 5.4 | 2 | 0.5 | |
| 4 | 3.5 | 16 | 0.04 | FE | |
| 6 | 5.4 | 2 | 0.5 | FE | |
| Major | 2 | 1.8 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Minor | 4 | 3.6 | 2 | 0.5 | |
| 8 | 7.1 | 20 | 5.1 | FE | |
| 10 | 8.9 | 16 | 4.1 | FE | |
| 4 | FE | ||||
| 2 | 1.8 | 2 | 0.01 | FE | |
| 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | 1.8 | 0 | 0 | FE | |
| 2 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.01 | FE | |
p Fisher’s exact significance
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Six months follow-up outcomes of the studied population
| Group 1 ( | Group 2 ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | ||
| 6 | 5.4 | 18 | 4.6 | ||
| 2 | 1.8 | 6 | 0.02 | FE | |
| 2 | 1.8 | 8 | 0.02 | FE | |
| 2 | 1.8 | 4 | 0.01 | FE | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | 1.8 | 6 | 0.02 | FE | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
p Fisher’s exact significance
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier estimates of MACCE between the two groups at 6 months