Literature DB >> 33825913

Impact of Valve Type (Ross vs. Mechanical) on Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Young Adults with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Daniel Beacher1,2, Peter Frommelt3,4, Cheryl Brosig3,4, Jian Zhang5, Pippa Simpson5, Viktor Hraska6,4, Salil Ginde3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of aortic valve replacement (AVR) type on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescents and young adults is unclear, but may vary depending on need for anticoagulation or re-intervention. We sought to determine the differences in HRQOL following AVR with either the Ross procedure or mechanical AVR in this young population.
METHODS: Patients 14-35 years old and at least 1 year post-AVR were included. HRQOL was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Valve-specific concerns regarding anticoagulation and reoperation were also assessed. Clinical outcome data were obtained by chart review.
RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled: 24 (47%) Ross and 27 (53%) mechanical AVR. Ross patients were younger at time of AVR (16 vs. 22 years, p < 0.01) and study enrollment (23.7 vs 29.5 years, p < 0.01). Median follow-up from AVR to study enrollment was similar (5.4 years for Ross vs. 5.6 years for mechanical, p = 0.62). At last follow-up, clinical outcomes including cardiac function, functional class, and aortic valve re-intervention rates were similar between groups, although mechanical valve patients had more bleeding events (p = 0.012). SF-36 scores were generally high for the entire cohort, with no significant difference between groups in any domain. Mechanical AVR patients reported more concern about frequency of blood draws (p < 0.01). Concern for reoperation was similar between both groups.
CONCLUSION: Despite more bleeding events and concern about the frequency of blood draws, adolescents and young adults with mechanical AVR reported similarly high levels of HRQOL compared to those following Ross AVR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congenital heart disease; Mechanical aortic valve replacement; Quality of life; Ross procedure; Surgical aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825913     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02589-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  19 in total

1.  Quality of life in aortic valve replacement: pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses.

Authors:  A Nötzold; M Hüppe; C Schmidtke; P Blömer; T Uhlig; H H Sievers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  National Practice Patterns and Early Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Children and Teens.

Authors:  Jennifer S Nelson; Timothy M Maul; Peter D Wearden; Sara K Pasquali; Jennifer C Romano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Quality of life after aortic valve surgery: replacement versus reconstruction.

Authors:  Diana Aicher; Annika Holz; Susanne Feldner; Volker Köllner; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  General anxiety of adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease is comparable with that in healthy controls.

Authors:  Jan Müller; John Hess; Alfred Hager
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  EMPoWARed: Edmonton pediatric warfarin self-management study.

Authors:  M E Bauman; M P Massicotte; S Kuhle; S Siddons; A A K Bruce
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Quality of life assessment in children commencing home INR self-testing.

Authors:  Sophie Jones; Paul Monagle; Elizabeth Manias; Aisha A K Bruce; Fiona Newall
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Quality of life and cognitive function in Fontan patients, a population-based study.

Authors:  Lars Idorn; Annette S Jensen; Klaus Juul; Dorthe Overgaard; Niels P Nielsen; Keld Sørensen; Jesper I Reimers; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Quality of life in children participating in a non-selective INR self-monitoring VKA-education programme.

Authors:  Pascal Amedro; Fanny Bajolle; Helena Bertet; Radhia Cheurfi; Dominique Lasne; Erika Nogue; Pascal Auquier; Marie-Christine Picot; Damien Bonnet
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.340

Review 9.  Outcome after aortic valve replacement in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan R G Etnel; Lisa C Elmont; Ebru Ertekin; M Mostafa Mokhles; Helena J Heuvelman; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Peter L de Jong; Willem A Helbing; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Quality of life after aortic valve repair is similar to Ross patients and superior to mechanical valve replacement: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Pavel Zacek; T Holubec; M Vobornik; J Dominik; J Takkenberg; J Harrer; J Vojacek
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.