Literature DB >> 33825902

EGFR Amplification in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Giovanni Randon1, Rona Yaeger2, Jaclyn F Hechtman3, Paolo Manca1, Giovanni Fucà1, Henry Walch4,5, Jeeyun Lee6, Elena Élez7, Jenny Seligmann8, Benedetta Mussolin9, Filippo Pagani1, Marco Maria Germani10,11, Margherita Ambrosini1, Daniele Rossini10,11, Margherita Ratti12, Francesc Salvà7, Susan D Richman8, Henry Wood8, Gouri Nanjangud13, Annunziata Gloghini14, Massimo Milione14, Alberto Bardelli9,15, Filippo de Braud1,6, Federica Morano1, Chiara Cremolini10,11, Filippo Pietrantonio1,16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EGFR amplification occurs in about 1% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) but is not routinely tested as a prognostic or predictive biomarker for patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Herein, we aimed to characterize the clinical and molecular landscape of EGFR-amplified mCRC.
METHODS: In this multinational cohort study, we compared clinical data of 62 patients with EGFR-amplified vs 1459 EGFR nonamplified mCRC, as well as comprehensive genomic data of 35 EGFR-amplified vs 439 EGFR nonamplified RAS/BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumor samples. All statistical tests were 2-sided.
RESULTS: EGFR amplification was statistically significantly associated with left primary tumor sidedness and RAS/BRAF wild-type status. All EGFR-amplified tumors were MSS and HER2 nonamplified. Overall, EGFR-amplified samples had higher median fraction of genome altered compared with EGFR-nonamplified, RAS/BRAF wild-type MSS cohort. Patients with EGFR-amplified tumors reported longer overall survival (OS) (median OS = 71.3 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 50.7 to not available [NA]) vs EGFR-nonamplified ones (24.0 months; 95% CI = 22.8 to 25.6; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.44; P < .001; adjusted HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.69; P < .001). In the subgroup of patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC exposed to anti-EGFR-based therapy, EGFR amplification was again associated with better OS (median OS = 54.0 months, 95% CI = 35.2 to NA, vs 29.1 months, 95% CI = 27.0 to 31.9, respectively; HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.76; P = .002).
CONCLUSION: Patients with EGFR-amplified mCRC represent a biologically defined subgroup and merit dedicated clinical trials with novel and more potent EGFR-targeting strategies beyond single-agent monoclonal antibodies.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825902      PMCID: PMC8562951          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  25 in total

1.  Flexible regression models with cubic splines.

Authors:  S Durrleman; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Glioblastoma-derived epidermal growth factor receptor carboxyl-terminal deletion mutants are transforming and are sensitive to EGFR-directed therapies.

Authors:  Jeonghee Cho; Sandra Pastorino; Qing Zeng; Xiaoyin Xu; William Johnson; Scott Vandenberg; Roel Verhaak; Andrew D Cherniack; Hideo Watanabe; Amit Dutt; Jihyun Kwon; Ying S Chao; Robert C Onofrio; Derek Chiang; Yuki Yuza; Santosh Kesari; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS.

Authors:  T Yoshino; D Arnold; H Taniguchi; G Pentheroudakis; K Yamazaki; R-H Xu; T W Kim; F Ismail; I B Tan; K-H Yeh; A Grothey; S Zhang; J B Ahn; M Y Mastura; D Chong; L-T Chen; S Kopetz; T Eguchi-Nakajima; H Ebi; A Ohtsu; A Cervantes; K Muro; J Tabernero; H Minami; F Ciardiello; J-Y Douillard
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  EGFR Amplification Induces Increased DNA Damage Response and Renders Selective Sensitivity to Talazoparib (PARP Inhibitor) in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Shaofang Wu; Feng Gao; Siyuan Zheng; Chen Zhang; Emmanuel Martinez-Ledesma; Ravesanker Ezhilarasan; Jie Ding; Xiaolong Li; Ningping Feng; Asha Multani; Erik P Sulman; Roel G Verhaak; John F de Groot; Tim P Heffernan; W K Alfred Yung; Dimpy Koul
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  F Mosele; J Remon; J Mateo; C B Westphalen; F Barlesi; M P Lolkema; N Normanno; A Scarpa; M Robson; F Meric-Bernstam; N Wagle; A Stenzinger; J Bonastre; A Bayle; S Michiels; I Bièche; E Rouleau; S Jezdic; J-Y Douillard; J S Reis-Filho; R Dienstmann; F André
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Amphiregulin Expression Is a Predictive Biomarker for EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Combined Analysis of Three Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Arndt Stahler; Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik P Modest; Ingrid Ricard; Clemens Giessen-Jung; Christine Kapaun; Boryana Ivanova; Florian Kaiser; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Nicolas Moosmann; Andreas Schalhorn; Martina Stauch; Alexander Kiani; Swantje Held; Thomas Decker; Markus Moehler; Jens Neumann; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Acquired RAS or EGFR mutations and duration of response to EGFR blockade in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Beth O Van Emburgh; Sabrina Arena; Giulia Siravegna; Luca Lazzari; Giovanni Crisafulli; Giorgio Corti; Benedetta Mussolin; Federica Baldi; Michela Buscarino; Alice Bartolini; Emanuele Valtorta; Joana Vidal; Beatriz Bellosillo; Giovanni Germano; Filippo Pietrantonio; Agostino Ponzetti; Joan Albanell; Salvatore Siena; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Clara Montagut; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Negative Hyperselection of Patients With RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Received Panitumumab-Based Maintenance Therapy.

Authors:  Federica Morano; Salvatore Corallo; Sara Lonardi; Alessandra Raimondi; Chiara Cremolini; Lorenza Rimassa; Roberto Murialdo; Alberto Zaniboni; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Gianluca Tomasello; Patrizia Racca; Matteo Clavarezza; Vincenzo Adamo; Federica Perrone; Annunziata Gloghini; Elena Tamborini; Adele Busico; Antonia Martinetti; Federica Palermo; Fotios Loupakis; Massimo Milione; Giovanni Fucà; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Filippo de Braud; Filippo Pietrantonio
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation.

Authors:  Gro Nilsen; Knut Liestøl; Peter Van Loo; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Marianne B Eide; Oscar M Rueda; Suet-Feung Chin; Roslin Russell; Lars O Baumbusch; Carlos Caldas; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Ole Christian Lingjaerde
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The genomic landscape of response to EGFR blockade in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Bertotti; Eniko Papp; Siân Jones; Vilmos Adleff; Valsamo Anagnostou; Barbara Lupo; Mark Sausen; Jillian Phallen; Carolyn A Hruban; Collin Tokheim; Noushin Niknafs; Monica Nesselbush; Karli Lytle; Francesco Sassi; Francesca Cottino; Giorgia Migliardi; Eugenia R Zanella; Dario Ribero; Nadia Russolillo; Alfredo Mellano; Andrea Muratore; Gianluca Paraluppi; Mauro Salizzoni; Silvia Marsoni; Michael Kragh; Johan Lantto; Andrea Cassingena; Qing Kay Li; Rachel Karchin; Robert Scharpf; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Salvatore Siena; Luis A Diaz; Livio Trusolino; Victor E Velculescu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Negative Ultraselection of Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild-Type, Microsatellite-Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Anti-EGFR-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Giovanni Randon; Giulia Maddalena; Marco Maria Germani; Chiara Carlotta Pircher; Paolo Manca; Francesca Bergamo; Mirella Giordano; Caterina Sposetti; Aldo Montagna; Guglielmo Vetere; Luca Zambelli; Cosimo Rasola; Alessandra Boccaccino; Filippo Pagani; Margherita Ambrosini; Marco Massafra; Gabriella Fontanini; Massimo Milione; Matteo Fassan; Chiara Cremolini; Sara Lonardi; Filippo Pietrantonio
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2022-04

2.  Custom multi‑tumor next‑generation sequencing panel for routine molecular diagnosis of solid tumors: Validation and results from three‑year clinical use.

Authors:  Sandy Chevrier; Astrid Brasselet; Marion Carnet; Angélique Chevriaux; Anne Gibeaud; Marine Jourdain; Hugo Mananet; Caroline Truntzer; Françoise Beltjens; Céline Charon-Barra; Laurent Arnould; Juliette Albuisson; Anthony Comte; Valentin Derangère; Vincent Goussot; Romain Boidot
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 3.  Tumor Biomarker Testing for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Canadian Consensus Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Irene S Yu; Francine Aubin; Rachel Goodwin; Jonathan M Loree; Cheryl Mather; Brandon S Sheffield; Stephanie Snow; Sharlene Gill
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.485

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.