Literature DB >> 33825549

Comment on "Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research" and "Beyond the Light under the Lamppost: New Chemical Candidates for Biomonitoring in Young Children".

Terri M Mitchell1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825549      PMCID: PMC8041269          DOI: 10.1289/EHP8570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


× No keyword cloud information.
In their exhaustive attempt to identify priority chemicals to evaluate in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) trial, Pellizzari et al. (2019) consulted no fewer than 21 databases and eventually identified 155 likely candidates. However, the authors were unable to identify the chemicals U.S. children are exposed to, instead stating that “Tens of thousands of chemicals have been approved for use in the United States” (Pellizzari et al. 2019). This indicates the lack of information about the number of synthetic chemicals Americans are exposed to. The Science Selection summary of the paper by Pellizzari et al. (2019) refers to “40,000 chemicals approved for commercial use in the United States” (Seltenrich 2020). This is incorrect. Chemicals do not undergo an approval process by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They are entered into the U.S. EPA’s Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Inventory upon 90 d notice (“Premanufacture Notice”) of the intent to manufacture or import, with numerous exemptions (Table 1). Accordingly, only a fraction of the commercially available chemicals in the United States are in the TSCA Inventory.
Table 1

Exemptions to the Toxic Substances Control Act Inventory.

Category
Mixturesa
Chemicals that do not pose an unreasonable risk to health or the environmentb
Chemicals not manufactured for a “significant new use”c
Chemicals that are equivalent to chemicals for which information has previously been submitted to the EPAc
Chemicals that will not enter the environment in substantial quantities or human exposure will not be significantd
Pesticidese
Food additivese
Drugse
Cosmeticse
Devicese
Research and developmente
Test marketinge
Chemicals manufactured solely for exporte
Chemical reaction products created during storage, disposal, or end usee
Nonisolated intermediatese
Impuritiese
Chemical reaction products with other chemicalse
Byproducts not used commerciallye
Tobacco and tobacco productse
Nuclear materialse
Munitionse
Certain types of polymersf
Nanomaterials except for “discrete forms”g
Petroleum productsh
Microorganismsh
Naturally occurring chemicalsh
Chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”)h

Control of Toxic Substances—Definitions. 2018.

Control of Toxic Substances—Findings, Policy, and Intent. 2018.

Control of Toxic Substances—Manufacturing and Processing Notices. 2018.

Control of Toxic Substances—Testing of Chemical Substances and Mixtures. 2018.

Protection of Environment—Chemicals Not Subject to Notification Requirements. 2020.

Protection of Environment—Premanufacture Notice Exemptions. 2020.

Protection of Environment—Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements. 2020.

Protection of Environment—TSCA Chemical Data Reporting Requirements. 2020.

Exemptions to the Toxic Substances Control Act Inventory. Control of Toxic Substances—Definitions. 2018. Control of Toxic Substances—Findings, Policy, and Intent. 2018. Control of Toxic Substances—Manufacturing and Processing Notices. 2018. Control of Toxic Substances—Testing of Chemical Substances and Mixtures. 2018. Protection of Environment—Chemicals Not Subject to Notification Requirements. 2020. Protection of Environment—Premanufacture Notice Exemptions. 2020. Protection of Environment—Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements. 2020. Protection of Environment—TSCA Chemical Data Reporting Requirements. 2020. Testing data are not required, nor are they usually provided, for the TSCA Inventory. If the chemical is for a “significant new use,” the company must submit “information” (substituted for “test data” in 2016) (Control of Toxic Substances—Definitions 2018). The U.S. EPA has adopted predictive models to assess risk based on structural similarity (U.S. EPA 2017) even though structure alone is not predictive of toxicity (Padberg et al. 2019; Preciados et al. 2016). If the agency finds that a chemical poses an “unreasonable risk,” it may implement a phase-out up to 5 y after it publishes a final rule unless it finds an exemption (Control of Toxic Substances—Prioritization, Risk Evaluation, and Regulation of Chemical Substances and Mixtures 2018). The U.S. EPA is currently conducting risk evaluations on 33 chemicals, including chemicals that were grandfathered in when the inventory was established in 1976 (U.S. EPA 2021). The 40,000 figure referenced in the Science Selection is from a U.S. EPA press release announcing that approximately half the chemicals on the inventory have been deleted because they are no longer active in U.S. commerce (U.S. EPA 2019). According to a U.S. EPA representative, use information was provided by manufacturers, and nothing other than the press release and the database are publicly available (personal communication, Tracy Williamson). The number of chemicals formerly listed in the inventory—87,000—is often misinterpreted as the number of chemicals in use in the United States (Colborn 2004) and misconstrued as the number of synthetic chemicals Americans are exposed to. The American Chemical Society currently lists more than 167 million chemical substances worldwide in its Chemical Abstract Service Registry (https://www.cas.org/support/documentation/chemical-substances). This registry can potentially yield the best estimate of chemical exposure in the United States. Based on these and other considerations, the number and identity of synthetic chemicals Americans are exposed to is unknown. Until a factual estimate is ascertained, scientists should refrain from referring to the TSCA Inventory given that it represents only a fraction of the actual number of chemicals in commerce and distorts an understanding of the extent of chemical exposure in the United States.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Estrogenic Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Influencing NRF1 Regulated Gene Networks in the Development of Complex Human Brain Diseases.

Authors:  Mark Preciados; Changwon Yoo; Deodutta Roy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Minor structural modifications of bisphenol A strongly affect physiological responses of HepG2 cells.

Authors:  F Padberg; P Tarnow; A Luch; S Zellmer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Identifying and Prioritizing Chemicals with Uncertain Burden of Exposure: Opportunities for Biomonitoring and Health-Related Research.

Authors:  Edo D Pellizzari; Tracey J Woodruff; Rebecca R Boyles; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Paloma I Beamer; Jessie P Buckley; Aolin Wang; Yeyi Zhu; Deborah H Bennett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 11.035

Review 4.  Neurodevelopment and endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Theo Colborn
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Beyond the Light under the Lamppost: New Chemical Candidates for Biomonitoring in Young Children.

Authors:  Nate Seltenrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.