Literature DB >> 33825128

Do data from mechanical Turk subjects replicate accuracy, response time, and diffusion modeling results?

Roger Ratcliff1, Andrew T Hendrickson2.   

Abstract

Online data collection is being used more and more, especially in the face of the COVID crisis. To examine the quality of such data, we chose to replicate lexical decision and item recognition paradigms from Ratcliff et al. (Cognitive Psychology, 60, 127-157, 2010) and numerosity discrimination paradigms from Ratcliff and McKoon (Psychological Review, 125, 183-217, 2018) with subjects recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT). Along with these tasks, we collected data from either an IQ test or a math computation test. Subjects in the lexical decision and item recognition tasks were relatively well-behaved, with only a few giving a significant number of responses with response times (RTs) under 300 ms at chance accuracy, i.e., fast guesses, and a few with unstable RTs across a session. But in the numerosity discrimination tasks, almost half of the subjects gave a significant number of fast guesses and/or unstable RTs across the session. Diffusion model parameters were largely consistent with the earlier studies as were correlations across tasks and correlations with IQ and age. One surprising result was that eliminating fast outliers from subjects with highly variable RTs (those eliminated from the main analyses) produced diffusion model analyses that showed patterns of correlations similar to the subjects with stable performance. Methods for displaying data to examine stability, eliminating subjects, and implementing RT data collection on AMT including checks on timing are also discussed.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Across-session variability; Diffusion decision model; Mechanical Turk data; Response time and accuracy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825128      PMCID: PMC8641698          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01573-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  2 in total

1.  Gender Differences in Emotional Connotative Meaning of Words Measured by Osgood's Semantic Differential Techniques in Young Adults.

Authors:  Robert M Chapman; Margaret N Gardner; Megan Lyons
Journal:  Humanit Soc Sci Commun       Date:  2022-04-06

2.  Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Ana Baciero; Pablo Gómez; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.