Literature DB >> 33824972

Postdischarge thromboembolic outcomes and mortality of hospitalized patients with COVID-19: the CORE-19 registry.

Dimitrios Giannis1,2, Steven L Allen3,4, James Tsang1, Sarah Flint1,4, Tamir Pinhasov1,4, Stephanie Williams1,4, Gary Tan1,4, Richa Thakur1,4, Christian Leung1,4, Matthew Snyder1,4, Chirag Bhatia1,4, David Garrett1,4, Christina Cotte1,4, Shelby Isaacs1,4, Emma Gugerty1,4, Anne Davidson5,6, Galina S Marder5, Austin Schnitzer5, Bradley Goldberg3,4, Thomas McGinn1,4, Karina W Davidson1,4, Matthew A Barish7, Michael Qiu1, Meng Zhang1, Mark Goldin1,4, Miltiadis Matsagkas2, Eleni Arnaoutoglou8, Alex C Spyropoulos1,4.   

Abstract

Thromboembolic events, including venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and mortality from subclinical thrombotic events occur frequently in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) inpatients. Whether the risk extends postdischarge has been controversial. Our prospective registry included consecutive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized within our multihospital system from 1 March to 31 May 2020. We captured demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, medications, postdischarge thromboprophylaxis, and 90-day outcomes. Data from electronic health records, health informatics exchange, radiology database, and telephonic follow-up were merged. Primary outcome was a composite of adjudicated VTE, ATE, and all-cause mortality (ACM). Principal safety outcome was major bleeding (MB). Among 4906 patients (53.7% male), mean age was 61.7 years. Comorbidities included hypertension (38.6%), diabetes (25.1%), obesity (18.9%), and cancer history (13.1%). Postdischarge thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 13.2%. VTE rate was 1.55%; ATE, 1.71%; ΑCM, 4.83%; and MB, 1.73%. Composite primary outcome rate was 7.13% and significantly associated with advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 3.66; 95% CI, 2.84-4.71), prior VTE (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 2.00-4.47), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.78-2.93), chronic kidney disease (CKD; OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.47-3.0), peripheral arterial disease (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.10-3.80), carotid occlusive disease (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.30-3.14), IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4 (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.06-2.14), and coronary artery disease (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.04-2.17). Postdischarge anticoagulation was significantly associated with reduction in primary outcome (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47-0.81). Postdischarge VTE, ATE, and ACM occurred frequently after COVID-19 hospitalization. Advanced age, cardiovascular risk factors, CKD, IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4, and ICU stay increased risk. Postdischarge anticoagulation reduced risk by 46%.
© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33824972      PMCID: PMC8032474          DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020010529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality globally. Importantly, elevated rates of macrovessel thrombotic events, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and arterial thromboembolism (ATE), such as stroke and myocardial infarction (MI), have been described, especially in sick and critically ill hospitalized patients.[1-4] In addition, postmortem studies suggest that ∼60% and up to 100% of patients have unsuspected VTE or pulmonary arterial thrombosis at the time of death, with pulmonary microthrombi suggesting in situ fatal PE as an important contributor to death.[5,6] There are limited and conflicting data on the rates of thromboembolic events and death in the postdischarge period for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, with previous studies limited by small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and nonstandardized follow-up.[7,8] Antithrombotic guidelines for extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19 are also conflicting, suggesting either no routine thromboprophylaxis or an individualized approach to thromboprophylaxis using individual thrombotic and bleeding risk factors.[9-11] There have been few previous efforts to assess predictors of thrombosis or death in the postdischarge period for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, which represent a subset of medically ill patients.[12] Previous data from randomized trials suggest an elevated rate of major and fatal thromboembolic events in high-risk medically ill patients (including those with pneumonia and sepsis) within 6 weeks of hospital discharge, with a significant 28% to 38% risk reduction using extended thromboprophylaxis.[13,14] To overcome the current knowledge gap in postdischarge rates of VTE, ATE, death, and major complications in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we undertook an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective registry named CORE-19 as part of the COVID-19 Research Consortium of our health system. Our second aim was to assess clinical and laboratory risk factors, as well as relevant medications, including anticoagulants, to predict risk of thromboembolic disease or death in the postdischarge period.

Methods

This study was a prospective registry of consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection within the Northwell Health System. The Northwell Health Institutional Review Board approved our study (#20-0363) and, as described in International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, provided regulatory oversight. The study was performed with waiver of informed consent. The patient population consisted of discharged adult (age >18 years) patients with a polymerase chain reaction–confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis admitted to 1 of the 12 hospitals within the Northwell Health System for nonobstetric/nongynecologic reasons from 1 March to 31 May 2020 and responding to follow-up phone calls. Transfers between in-system hospitals were considered as a single visit. For patients with multiple hospitalizations for COVID-19, only the first hospitalization was considered. Our hospital system policy, which went into effect on 7 April 2020, at the height of the pandemic, recommended extended thromboprophylaxis with the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) rivaroxaban (10 mg orally) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously daily; if creatinine clearance ≥15 mL/min) for 30 days in patients with COVID-19 with an IMPROVE VTE score of ≥4 or D-dimer twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) or higher. The IMPROVE-DD VTE score is a validated VTE risk assessment model both patients without COVID-19, and more recently for patients with COVID-19.[15,16] Data of interest were assessed by electronic medical record and health informatics exchange (HIE) review, a filtered radiology informatics database, and REDCap data entry with a comprehensive data collection form (including data derived from telephonic patient calls) through 90 days postdischarge (Figure 1). Our data set included demographic characteristics, all available diagnoses, comorbidities, VTE risk factors, laboratory values (highest values during index hospitalization), and medications, including in-hospital and postdischarge thromboprophylaxis, and image results were assessed up to 90 days after hospital discharge.
Figure 1.

Data sources included in the unified repository (datamart).

Data sources included in the unified repository (datamart). The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of VTE (DVT and PE), ATE (stroke, MI, non-MI coronary revascularization, major adverse limb event, and systemic embolism), and all-cause mortality (ACM) within 90 days of hospital discharge. DVT was defined as a noncompressible venous segment on compression ultrasonography or presence of an intraluminal filling defect on venography. PE was defined as an intraluminal filling defect on computed tomography (CT) angiography or spiral CT. Our hospital policy did not include any systematic screening for VTE during this study. Stroke was defined by a new focal neurologic defect lasting ≥24 hours, as confirmed by a neurologist with imaging studies. MI was defined by detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarker values with at least 1 value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit and with at least 1 of the following: 1) symptoms of acute myocardial ischemia, 2) new or presumed new significant ST segment–T wave changes or new left bundle branch block development of pathologic Q waves in the electrocardiogram, 3) imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality in a pattern consistent with ischemic etiology, or 4) identification of an intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy. Major adverse limb event was defined by confirmation of arterial obstruction by imaging (including ultrasound, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, or conventional angiography), surgical findings, or pathology. Systemic embolism was defined as abrupt vascular insufficiency associated with radiologic evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanisms. Death was determined by telephonic patient calls. The principal safety outcome was major bleeding (MB) using International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.[17] Secondary outcomes included rehospitalization (with or without intensive care unit [ICU] admission), congestive heart failure exacerbation, atrial fibrillation/flutter, interstitial lung disease, myocarditis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome using standardized definitions. Our dedicated team of 35 abstractors attempted to contact discharged patients via at least 3 phone calls on different days and at different times to obtain 1 set of data elements during the study period using a standardized and structured questionnaire. All study data were aggregated and systematically stored in a unified repository (datamart) developed by the Center for Research Informatics and Innovation. Our database includes data extracted through automatic extract-transform-load (ETL) processes that query and transfer data from radiology databases, electronic health records (through identification of International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Revision codes), and the HIE and REDCap sources. The unified repository resides in an instance of Microsoft SQL Server database and uses a common data model that ensures semantic interoperability between data originating from disparate sources and accurate interpretation of statistical analyses. The team of abstractors called the patients and entered any postdischarge outcomes in the standardized REDCap questionnaire. Subsequently, in the population of respondents, demographic characteristics, all available diagnoses, comorbidities, VTE risk factors, laboratory values (highest values during index hospitalization), medications including in-hospital and postdischarge thromboprophylaxis, and postdischarge events were captured through automatic ETL processes that extracted data from radiology images, electronic health records, and HIE. All postdischarge outcomes that were captured manually through phone calls (in REDCap) or through automatic ETL processes were pooled in a common file that was then used by the abstractors to manually screen the patients’ records and confirm or reject the presence of an outcome. The postdischarge outcomes were adjudicated by 2 abstractors, and any disagreements were resolved by a third experienced abstractor (A.C.S.). Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages; continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between independent variables and the composite outcome consisting of VTE or ATE or ACM (yes or no). Univariate analyses were performed first, followed by multivariate analyses. In the final logistic regression model, the following variables were included regardless of their univariate P values: age, body mass index, IMPROVE-DD VTE score, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents, D-dimer >4 to 6 times the ULN or >6 times the ULN, history of VTE, coronary artery disease, history of peripheral arterial disease, history of carotid occlusive disease, congestive heart failure, chronic renal disease, race, and ICU admission. Variables with univariate P values <.2 were also included in the final model if selected through backward selection process. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; Cary, NC). A 2- tailed P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and VTE risk factors

Of a total of 11 249 adult nonobstetric/nongynecologic hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (1 March to 31 May 2020), 3081 died in hospital. We thus identified 8168 eligible patients, of whom we contacted 8034. Our abstractors were able to capture the outcomes of 4906 unique patients (61% response rate) at a mean follow-up of 92.0 ± 13.8 days (Table 1). The cohort had a mean age of 61.7 ± 17.5 years, was predominantly male (53.7%), and consisted of 36.6% White, 21.4% Black, and 8.1% Asian patients; an additional 29.6% of patients who did not self-identify race were grouped in the “other” category.
Table 1.

Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and VTE risk factors (N = 4906)

Population characteristicn (%)
Age, y
 Mean61.7
 SD17.5
 Median63.0
 IQR25.0
Sex
 Male2633 (53.7)
 Female2273 (46.3)
Race
 Black1051 (21.4)
 Asian396 (8.1)
 White1797 (36.6)
 Other or unspecified1451 (29.6)
 Unknown211 (4.3)
Ethnicity
 Hispanic or Latino1051 (21.4)
 Not Hispanic or Latino3373 (68.8)
 Unknown166 (3.4)
 Declined316 (6.4)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension1895 (38.6)
 Diabetes mellitus1234 (25.1)
 Coronary artery disease340 (6.9)
 Heart failure219 (4.5)
 Atrial fibrillation321 (6.5)
 Valvular heart disease12 (0.2)
 Chronic renal disease334 (6.8)
 Chronic lung disease359 (7.3)
 Chronic liver disease48 (1.0)
 Thyroid disease354 (7.2)
 BMI >35 kg/m2752 (18.9)
 ICU stay578 (11.8)
 Bleeding history438 (8.9)
 Ischemic stroke history174 (3.6)
 Carotid occlusive disease history181 (3.7)
 Peripheral arterial disease history83 (1.7)
VTE risk factors
 Personal history of VTE531 (10.8)
 Family history of VTE69 (1.4)
 Thrombophilia69 (1.4)
 Cancer history644 (13.1)
 Autoimmune disease102 (2.1)
 Paraplegia/hemiplegia18 (0.4)

BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.

Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and VTE risk factors (N = 4906) BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation. Main comorbidities included hypertension in 38.6%, diabetes mellitus in 25.1%, body mass index >35 kg/m2 in 18.9%, ICU admission at index hospitalization in 11.8%, coronary artery disease in 6.9%, heart failure in 4.5%, atrial fibrillation in 6.5%, history of ischemic stroke in 3.6%, history of carotid occlusive disease in 3.7%, peripheral arterial disease in 1.7%, history of bleeding in 8.9%, chronic renal disease in 6.8%, chronic lung disease in 7.3%, chronic liver disease in 1.0%, and thyroid disease in 7.2%. Main comorbidities associated with increased risk of VTE included a personal history of VTE in 10.8%, known thrombophilia in 1.4%, cancer in 13.1%, autoimmune disease in 2.1%, family history of VTE in 1.4%, and paraplegia or hemiplegia in 0.4%. The population characteristics and main comorbidities of 3262 patients who were eligible and did not respond to follow-up phone calls or were not contacted are summarized in the data supplement. There did not seem to be major differences in demographic characteristics and comorbidities between the group of patients for whom follow-up was available and this group.

Laboratory parameters

In-hospital laboratory parameters included mild leukocytosis (white blood cell count, 11.0 ± 6.7 × 103/μL), mildly increased serum creatinine (1.8 ± 2.5 mg/dL), elevated troponin I (1.0 ± 3.9 ng/mL), markedly increased D-dimer (3373.6 ± 7113.2 ng/mL), increased interleukin-6 (IL-6; 63.3 ± 112.6 pg/mL), C-reactive protein (138.7 ± 99.1 mg/L), lactic acid (2.2 ± 1.7 mmol/L), and lactate dehydrogenase (469.1 ± 541.7 μ/L; Table 2).
Table 2.

Key laboratory parameters during index hospitalization

nMean ± SDMedian ± IQR
Laboratory parameters*
 WBC, × 103/μL418711.0 ± 6.79.5 ± 6.8
 Hb, g/dL418612.9 ± 2.112.9 ± 2.7
 Hct, %418639.7 ± 6.139.6 ± 7.7
 Platelets, × 103/μL4187341.8 ± 153.1318.0 ± 206.0
 Serum creatinine, mg/dL40411.8 ± 2.51.0 ± 0.7
 TnI, ng/mL2611.0 ± 3.90.1 ± 0.2
 TnT, ng/mL2060.3 ± 0.80.1 ± 0.1
 D-dimer, ng/mL5083373.6 ± 7113.2779.0 ± 2500.0
 IL-6, pg/mL9263.3 ± 112.622.0 ± 36.0
 CRP, mg/L626138.7 ± 99.1122.1 ± 137.5
 Lactic acid, mmol/L12692.2 ± 1.71.8 ± 1.3
 LDH, μ/L2339469.1 ± 541.7401.0 ± 250.0
Antiphospholipid antibodies
 Anticardiolipin IgG, GPL3017.3 ± 17.011.5 ± 10.8
 Anticardiolipin IgM, MPL3219.6 ± 20.616.9 ± 14.3
 β2GPI IgA, SAU411.5 ± 2.411.7 ± 3.5
 β2GPI IgM, SMU539.5 ± 58.514.3 ± 1.2
 LA dRVVT, sec2141.5 ± 10.339.9 ± 12.8
 LA SCT, ratio140.89 ± 0.190.91 ± 0.24

β2GP1, β-2-glycoprotein 1; CRP, C-reactive protein; GPL, G phospholipids; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; Ig, immunoglobulin; IQR, interquartile range; LA dRVVT, lupus anticoagulant dilute Russell’s viper venom time; LA SCT, lupus anticoagulant silica clotting time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MPL, M phospholipids; SD, standard deviation; Tn, troponin;

Highest value during initial hospitalization. Normal laboratory values are as follows: TnI, 0.00-0.03 ng/mL; TnT, 0.0-0.06 ng/mL; D-dimer, 0.0-229.0 ng/mL; IL-6, 0.0-13.0 pg/mL; CRP, 0.0-0.4 mg/L; lactic acid, 0.5-2.0 mmol/L; LDH, 50.0-242.0 μ/L; anticardiolipin IgG, 0.0-12.5 GPL; anticardiolipin IgM, 0.0-12.5 MPL; β2GPI IgA, 0.0-20.0 SAU; and β2GPI IgM, 0.0-.20.0 SMU.

Key laboratory parameters during index hospitalization β2GP1, β-2-glycoprotein 1; CRP, C-reactive protein; GPL, G phospholipids; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; Ig, immunoglobulin; IQR, interquartile range; LA dRVVT, lupus anticoagulant dilute Russell’s viper venom time; LA SCT, lupus anticoagulant silica clotting time; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MPL, M phospholipids; SD, standard deviation; Tn, troponin; Highest value during initial hospitalization. Normal laboratory values are as follows: TnI, 0.00-0.03 ng/mL; TnT, 0.0-0.06 ng/mL; D-dimer, 0.0-229.0 ng/mL; IL-6, 0.0-13.0 pg/mL; CRP, 0.0-0.4 mg/L; lactic acid, 0.5-2.0 mmol/L; LDH, 50.0-242.0 μ/L; anticardiolipin IgG, 0.0-12.5 GPL; anticardiolipin IgM, 0.0-12.5 MPL; β2GPI IgA, 0.0-20.0 SAU; and β2GPI IgM, 0.0-.20.0 SMU.

In-hospital and discharge medications

In-hospital medications included IL-6 antagonists (tocilizumab or sarilumab) in 56.3%, hydroxychloroquine in 55.6%, statins in 30.6%, glucocorticoids in 27.1%, aspirin in 21.9%, other antiplatelet agents in 5.7%, famotidine in 14.3%, antibiotics in 10.5%, IL-1 antagonist (anakinra) in 6.0%, and antivirals in 2.0% (Tables 3-6).
Table 3.

Key in-hospital and discharge medications

Medicationn (%)
In hospitalDischarge
IL-6 antagonists*2762 (56.3)262 (5.3)
Hydroxychloroquine2728 (55.6)262 (5.3)
Statins1500 (30.6)135 (2.8)
Aspirin1073 (21.9)91 (1.9)
Other antiplatelets279 (5.7)29 (0.6)
Famotidine699 (14.3)65 (1.3)
Antibiotics517 (10.5)31 (0.6)
Anakinra295 (6.0)0 (0.0)
Antivirals98 (2.0)1 (0.02)
IV immunogloblin26 (0.5)0 (0.0)
Glucocorticoids1329 (27.1)118 (2.4)

Tocilizumab or sarilumab.

Clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or cangrelor.

Table 4.

Key in-hospital corticosteroids (n = 1329)

Medicationn (%)
PatientsDose, mgDuration, d
Hydrocortisone36 (27.1)51.1 (29.6)7.2 (14.7)
Prednisone290 (21.8)31.8 (17.6)15.5 (33.2)
Prednisolone1 (<0.01)60.0 (0.0)3.6 (0.0
Methylprednisolone1301 (97.9)55.4 (70.4)6.4 (12.6)
Dexamethasone70 (5.3)7.9 (7.2)12.4 (21.0)
Bethamethasone5 (<0.01)13.2 (2.7)1.0 (0.0)

In-hospital corticosteroid frequency: betamethasone, once daily; dexamethasone, once, twice, 3 times, and 4 times daily; hydrocortisone, once, twice, 3 times, and 4 times daily; methylprednisolone, once, twice, 3 times, and 4 times daily, every 4 hours; prednisolone, once daily; and prednisone, once and twice daily.

Table 5.

Key in-hospital and discharge anticoagulants

Anticoagulantn (%)
In hospitalDischarge
ProphylacticTreatmentProphylacticTreatment
Enoxaparin2630 (53.6)272 (5.5)62 (1.3)13 (0.3)
UFH (subcutaneous)984 (20.1)3 (0.06)
UFH (IV)230 (4.7)
Fondaparinux1 (0.02)5 (0.1)
Apixaban309 (6.3)52 (1.1)180 (3.7)
Dabigatran
Rivaroxaban112 (2.3)51 (1.0)336 (6.9)1 (0.02)
Argatroban (IV)
Warfarin77 (1.6)17 (0.4)

UFH, unfractionated heparin.

Table 6.

Anticoagulants at discharge and IMPROVE-DD score

IMPROVE-DD scoreAnticoagulant at discharge
YesNoP*
<4380 (9.7)3537 (90.3)<.0001
≥4213 (21.5)776 (78.5)

Bold font indicates significance.

Key in-hospital and discharge medications Tocilizumab or sarilumab. Clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, or cangrelor. Key in-hospital corticosteroids (n = 1329) In-hospital corticosteroid frequency: betamethasone, once daily; dexamethasone, once, twice, 3 times, and 4 times daily; hydrocortisone, once, twice, 3 times, and 4 times daily; methylprednisolone, once, twice, 3 times, and 4 times daily, every 4 hours; prednisolone, once daily; and prednisone, once and twice daily. Key in-hospital and discharge anticoagulants UFH, unfractionated heparin. Anticoagulants at discharge and IMPROVE-DD score Bold font indicates significance. At index hospitalization, thromboprophylaxis consisted of prophylactic enoxaparin in 53.6%, treatment dose enoxaparin in 5.5%, subcutaneous prophylactic unfractionated heparin in 20.1%, IV treatment-dose unfractionated heparin in 4.7%, prophylactic apixaban in 6.3%, treatment-dose apixaban in 1.1%, prophylactic rivaroxaban in 2.3%, treatment-dose rivaroxaban in 1.0%, and treatment-dose warfarin in 1.6% (Tables 3-6; supplemental Table 1, available on the Blood Web site). Postdischarge thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 12.7% of the population and consisted of prophylactic-dose rivaroxaban in 6.9%, prophylactic-dose apixaban in 3.7%, and prophylactic-dose enoxaparin in 1.3%. The rate of postdischarge thromboprophylaxis in patients with an IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4 was 21.5% compared with patients with an IMPROVE-DD VTE score <4 who had a postdischarge thromboprophylaxis rate of 9.7% (P < .0001).

VTE, ATE, ACM, BM, and other postdischarge event rates

VTE was diagnosed in 76 patients (1.55%) postdischarge and included 44 DVTs (0.90%), 42 PEs (0.85%), 2 splanchnic vein thrombosis (0.04%), and 3 other vein thromboses (0.06%; right cephalic vein, n = 1; brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula, n = 1; and superior vena cava, n = 1; Table 7).
Table 7.

ATE, VTE, mortality, MB, and other postdischarge outcomes

n (%)
VTE76 (1.55)*
 DVT44 (0.90)
 PE42 (0.85)
 Splanchnic vein thrombosis2 (0.04)
 Other vein thrombosis3 (0.06)
Arterial thromboembolism84 (1.71)*
 Stroke22 (0.45)
 MI24 (0.49)
 Non-MI coronary revascularization6 (0.12)
 Major adverse limb event26 (0.53)
 Systemic embolism16 (0.33)
All-cause mortality237 (4.83)
MB85 (1.73)
Other outcomes
 Rehospitalization759 (15.5)
 ICU admission230 (4.69)
 Heart failure exacerbation63 (1.28)
 Atrial fibrillation/flutter22 (0.45)
 Interstitial lung disease26 (0.53)
 Myocarditis1 (0.02)
 Acute respiratory distress syndrome113 (2.3)

Patients may have multiple events.

ATE, VTE, mortality, MB, and other postdischarge outcomes Patients may have multiple events. ATE was diagnosed postdischarge in 84 patients (1.71%) and included stroke in 22 (0.45%), myocardial infarction in 24 (0.49%), non-MI coronary revascularization in 6 (0.12%), major adverse limb event in 26 (0.53%), and systemic embolism in 16 (0.33%). Postdischarge ACM was 4.83%. MB was diagnosed in 85 patients (1.73%). Of these 85 patients with MB, 15 (17.6%) were prescribed postdischarge anticoagulants. Secondary postdischarge events included a rate of rehospitalization of 15.5%, with 4.69% admitted to the ICU; acute respiratory distress syndrome in 113 (2.3%); heart failure exacerbation in 63 (1.28%); new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter in 22 (0.45%); and interstitial lung disease in 26 (0.53%).

VTE, ATE, or ACM

Univariate analysis

Overall the VTE, ATE, or ACM rate was 7.13% (350 of 4906 patients). Univariate analysis showed that the composite end point was associated with age >75 years (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 3.47-5.40), race (other; OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62), coronary artery disease (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.78-3.39), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.31-3.00), atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.80-3.46), chronic renal disease (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.10-3.91), thyroid disease (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.10-2.26), admission to the ICU (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.10-3.38), history of bleeding (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.78-3.21), history of ischemic stroke (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.10-4.67), carotid occlusive disease (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.19-4.77), and peripheral arterial disease (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.67-5.23; Table 8). VTE risk factors that were associated with the composite end point included personal history of VTE (OR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.35-5.50), family history of VTE (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.30-7.20), known thrombophilia (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 2.30-7.20), history of cancer (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.18-2.08), and IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4 (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.91-4.55). Lastly, the composite end point was associated with a D-dimer level >6 times the ULN (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.43-2.31) and a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio ≥3 (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07-1.81).
Table 8.

VTE, ATE, or mortality: univariate analysis

PredictorOR95% CIP*
Age >75 y4.333.47-5.40<.0001
Female sex0.970.78-1.21.810
Race
 White1.001.00-1.00
 Black0.730.55-0.96.811
 Asian0.730.48-1.10.843
 Other0.470.36-0.62.0001
Comorbidities
 Hypertension1.371.10-1.70.005
 Diabetes mellitus1.301.03-1.65.030
 Coronary artery disease2.451.78-3.39<.0001
 Congestive heart failure1.991.31-3.00.001
 Atrial fibrillation2.501.80-3.46<.0001
 Valvular heart disease1.180.15-9.20.872
 Chronic renal disease2.862.10-3.91<.0001
 Chronic lung disease0.970.64-1.48.897
 Chronic liver disease1.520.60-3.87.378
 Thyroid disease1.581.10-2.26.013
 BMI >35 kg/m20.850.67-1.08.186
 ICU admission2.662.10-3.38<.0001
 Bleeding history2.391.78-3.21<.0001
 Ischemic stroke history3.132.10-4.67<.0001
 Carotid occlusive disease history3.232.19-4.77<.0001
 Peripheral arterial disease history2.961.67-5.23.0002
VTE risk factors
 Personal history of VTE4.293.35-5.50<.0001
 Family history of VTE4.072.30-7.20<.0001
 Thrombophilia4.072.30-7.20<.0001
 Cancer history1.571.18-2.08.0019
 Autoimmune disease0.530.19-1.44.211
 Paraplegia/hemiplegia1.630.37-7.12.520
IMPROVE-DD ≥43.642.91-4.55<.0001
D-dimer, ng/mL
 0-920 (<4× ULN)1.001.00-1.00
 921-1380 (4-6× ULN)1.510.99-2.30.054
 >1380 (>6× ULN)1.811.43-2.31<.0001
NLR ≥31.391.07-1.81.013
Medications at discharge
 Anticoagulants0.850.60-1.21.367
 Antiplatelets1.560.87-2.80.137

BMI, body mass index; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio.

Bold font indicates significance.

VTE, ATE, or mortality: univariate analysis BMI, body mass index; NLR, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Bold font indicates significance.

Multivariate analysis

Multivariate analysis showed significant association between VTE, ATE, or ACM with advanced age (>75 years; OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.84-4.71; P < .0001), race (other; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P = .015), IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4 (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.06-2.14; P = .023), personal history of VTE (OR, 2.99; 95% CI, 2.00-4.47; P < .0001), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.04-2.17; P = .032), peripheral arterial disease (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.10-3.80; P = .024), carotid occlusive disease (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.30-3.14; P = .0002), chronic renal disease (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.47-3.0; P < .0001), and admission to the ICU (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.78-2.93; P < .0001). The use of anticoagulant medications prescribed at discharge was significantly associated with a 46% reduction in the composite primary efficacy outcome, with ACM comprising the majority of this outcome (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47-0.81; P = .003; Table 9). Sensitivity analysis was also performed in the subgroup of patients receiving prophylactic-dose anticoagulant medications at discharge, and the anticoagulant medication effect was consistent with a reduction in this composite primary efficacy outcome (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.83; P = .0046).
Table 9.

VTE, ATE, or mortality: multivariable analysis

PredictorOR95% CIP*
Age >75 y3.662.84-4.71<.0001
BMI >35 kg/m20.950.73-1.24.691
Black race0.790.57-1.09.149
Asian race1.180.75-1.84.476
Other race0.680.50-0.93.015
IMPROVE-DD ≥41.511.06-2.14.023
Anticoagulants (discharge)0.540.47-0.81.003
Antiplatelets (discharge)1.500.77-2.90.231
D-dimer 4-6× ULN1.170.74-1.85.507
D-dimer >6× ULN1.090.81-1.45.577
Personal history of VTE2.992.00-4.47<.0001
Coronary artery disease1.501.04-2.17.032
Peripheral arterial disease history2.041.10-3.80.024
Carotid occlusive disease history2.021.30-3.14.0002
Heart failure0.930.58-1.51.787
Chronic renal disease2.101.47-3.0<.0001
ICU admission2.221.78-2.93<.0001
Lymphocyte count0.970.96-0.99<.0001

Bold font indicates significance.

Compared with White race.

Compared with 4× ULN.

VTE, ATE, or mortality: multivariable analysis Bold font indicates significance. Compared with White race. Compared with 4× ULN. The results of a multivariate analysis that was not part of the prespecified analysis and included only VTE and ATE without mortality as a sensitivity analysis are shown in the data supplement.

Discussion

Our prospective multihospital registry of 4906 adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19 that have a mean follow-up of 92 days represents the largest study to date of postdischarge major thromboembolic events and death conducted in this population. Our results reveal 3 important findings. First, VTE, ATE, and ACM occur with a higher frequency during this postdischarge period than previously thought. Second, key predictors of postdischarge major thromboembolic events and death include advanced age >75 years, cardiovascular risk factors (personal history of VTE, coronary artery disease, carotid occlusive disease, and peripheral arterial disease), CKD, IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4, and ICU stay. Third, postdischarge anticoagulants, mostly at prophylactic dosages, reduce the risk of major thromboembolic events and death by 46%. It is by now well recognized that COVID-19 induces a prothrombotic state resulting from interactions between the immune, inflammatory, and coagulation systems in sick, hospitalized patients that lead to a multifold increased risk of in-hospital VTE and ATE.[4,18] In addition, autopsy data in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 suggested that ∼60% and up to 100% of thrombotic events including PE and pulmonary arterial thrombosis may not be suspected before death, indicating that thrombotic mechanisms play a major role in mortality.[5,6] As such, major thrombotic events and death may represent competing risks in these patients. Our study found that hospitalized patients with COVID-19 had a postdischarge ΑCM rate of nearly 5%; an ATE rate of 1.71% that included stroke, MI, non-MI coronary revascularization, major adverse limb event, and systemic embolism; and a VTE rate of 1.55%, more than half of the events of which included PE, with a composite primary outcome rate of 7.13% in the 90-day period postdischarge. These rates are higher than previous reports of postdischarge thrombotic events in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, with absolute VTE rates of 0.2% to 0.98% seen in 3 studies of 1529, 1877, and 102 patients, respectively, whereas results of another small study of 163 patients were more in line with our findings, suggesting a cumulative incidence of arterial and venous thrombosis of 2.5% (95% CI, 0.8% to 7.6%) at 30 days.[7,8,12,19] The reasons for these discrepant results may include the small sample sizes, retrospective designs, shorter observation periods, or lack of systematic follow-up and uniform data collection seen in previous studies compared with our prospective registry design. In addition, our results suggest at least a fourfold increased risk of major thromboembolic events and death in the postdischarge period in patients with COVID-19 compared with untreated hospitalized medically ill patients (including those with sepsis and pneumonia) in the pre–COVID-19 era, with event rates of ∼1.77%.[13] Our study also found that ∼1 in 6 patients was rehospitalized in the immediate postdischarge period, which is in accordance with a previous large study in patients with COVID-19 during the 60 days postdischarge (19.9%)[20] and comparable with 30-day readmission rates in patients with pneumonia (17.8%).[21] The postdischarge MB rate of 1.73% seen in our study was higher than that in a previous report of postdischarge MB of 0.7% (95% CI, 0.1% to 5.1%) seen in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.[8] However, this study included a small sample size and retrospective design, which may have underestimated results. In addition, our MB rate is multifold higher than previous rates of MB of ∼0.2% seen in contemporary studies of extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis of hospitalized medically ill patients before the COVID-19 era.[13] Of the 85 patients with MB in our study, only 17.6% were prescribed postdischarge anticoagulants. These data suggest that although the majority of MB occurred in the patient population not prescribed postdischarge anticoagulants, a clinically important relationship between postdischarge anticoagulation and MB cannot be ruled out. An important bleeding diathesis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 also cannot be excluded, although the rates of thrombotic events (and presumably unrecognized thrombotic events leading to death) are at least twofold higher than MB events. Our study found that advanced age >75 years, cardiovascular risk factors (personal history of VTE, coronary artery disease, carotid occlusive disease, and peripheral arterial disease), CKD, IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4, and ICU stay were all significantly associated with postdischarge major thromboembolic events and death, with ORs of ∼2.0 to 3.66, whereas “other” race in patients who did not self-identify race seemed protective, with an OR of 0.68. Advanced age, history of cardiovascular disease, and ICU level of care have been consistently associated with poor outcomes and increased thrombotic events and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.[3,22,23] CKD has also been associated with increased risk of thrombotic events and mortality in patients with COVID-19.[24,25] The IMPROVE VTE score has been extensively validated in medically ill patients,[26] and addition of an elevated D-dimer >2 times the ULN to improve model discrimination has identified medically ill patients (including those with pneumonia and sepsis) with a nearly threefold increased risk for VTE.[27] Consistent reports support that elevated D-dimer, which may reflect the hyperinflammatory state and cytokine storm that leads to thromboinflammation, especially >4 or 6 times the ULN, is a strong predictor of mortality and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19.[2,28] In our study, a D-dimer greater than sixfold the ULN was predictive of our primary outcome in univariate analysis, but it lost significance in the multivariate analysis. However, the IMPROVE-DD VTE score, which incorporates elevated D-dimer, was a significant predictor of postdischarge cardiovascular events and death, with an OR of 1.5 in the multivariate analysis. More recently, the IMPROVE-DD VTE score has been validated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, with patients with a score ≥4 having a high risk of thrombosis.[16] An important observation in our study is that anticoagulants (either LMWH or a DOAC), mainly at prophylactic doses and prescribed at hospital discharge, were significantly associated with a reduction in the composite outcome of ATE, VTE, or ACM by 46% in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. ACM represented the key component of our composite outcome. Previous autopsy-based studies in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 revealed that unsuspected antemortem thrombotic events such as in situ PE and pulmonary arterial thrombi may play a key role in subsequent death.[4-6,18] Our health system policy at the time of our study advocated for extended anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis for 30 days after hospitalization in high-risk hospitalized patients with COVID-19.[29] Previous high-quality data from randomized trials in high-risk hospitalized medically ill patients (including those with sepsis/pneumonia, IMPROVE VTE score ≥4, and elevated D-dimer) revealed a 28% to 38% risk reduction for major and fatal thromboembolic events (including ATE and VTE) using extended post–hospital discharge thromboprophylaxis with a DOAC.[13,14] Antithrombotic guidelines and hospital protocols in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 diverge on this topic, with some suggesting extended thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients with COVID-19[10,18,29,30] and others not advocating for extended thromboprophylaxis.[9,11,31] Our findings support extended thromboprophylaxis with an anticoagulant (either LMWH or preferably a DOAC because of oral route of administration) in high-risk patients with COVID-19 at low bleeding risk at the time of discharge, especially because a majority of postdischarge MB events in our study (82.4%) occurred in patients not receiving postdischarge anticoagulants. High-risk criteria include advanced age >75 years, presence of cardiovascular risk factors (personal history of VTE, coronary artery disease, carotid occlusive disease, and peripheral arterial disease), CKD, IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4, or ICU stay. Our study has several strengths and limitations. Our prospective registry design and large sample size of consecutive and diverse patients hospitalized with COVID-19 within a multihospital health system reinforce the generalizability of our findings. In addition, the use of a standardized data collection instrument and unified datamart reflects the high integrity of data collection, and use of adjudicated outcomes using record review reflects the high quality of outcome capture. Another potential strength when interpreting study results is the well-defined criteria for postdischarge thromboprophylaxis. Limitations include the lack of a comparator group, the potential introduction of hidden bias with our study’s 61% response rate, the inability to capture medication adherence including omission of anticoagulant use, and the inability to undergo further statistical analyses of less frequent cardiovascular complications with multivariate analyses. Another study limitation when interpreting results is the relatively small subgroup of patients who received postdischarge thromboprophylaxis. In summary, our prospective multihospital registry of 4906 adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19 followed for a mean of 92 days reveals that VTE, ATE, and ACM occur with a higher frequency during this postdischarge period than previously reported. Key predictors of postdischarge thromboembolic events and death include advanced age, cardiovascular risk factors, CKD, IMPROVE-DD VTE score ≥4, and ICU stay. The use of postdischarge anticoagulants, mostly at prophylactic doses, was associated with a reduction of the risk of major thromboembolic events and death by 46%. Well-conducted randomized trials of the efficacy and safety of extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are needed.

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article contains a data supplement. Click here for additional data file.
  26 in total

1.  Hospital nursing and 30-day readmissions among Medicare patients with heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia.

Authors:  Matthew McHugh; Chenjuan Ma
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.737

2.  Thrombosis in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in a New York City Health System.

Authors:  Seda Bilaloglu; Yin Aphinyanaphongs; Simon Jones; Eduardo Iturrate; Judith Hochman; Jeffrey S Berger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

4.  Post-Discharge Prophylaxis With Rivaroxaban Reduces Fatal and Major Thromboembolic Events in Medically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Alex C Spyropoulos; Walter Ageno; Gregory W Albers; C Gregory Elliott; Jonathan L Halperin; William R Hiatt; Gregory A Maynard; P Gabriel Steg; Jeffrey I Weitz; Wentao Lu; Theodore E Spiro; Elliot S Barnathan; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  COVID-19 and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Francesca Mai; Rita Del Pinto; Claudio Ferri
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dominic Wichmann; Jan-Peter Sperhake; Marc Lütgehetmann; Stefan Steurer; Carolin Edler; Axel Heinemann; Fabian Heinrich; Herbert Mushumba; Inga Kniep; Ann Sophie Schröder; Christoph Burdelski; Geraldine de Heer; Axel Nierhaus; Daniel Frings; Susanne Pfefferle; Heinrich Becker; Hanns Bredereke-Wiedling; Andreas de Weerth; Hans-Richard Paschen; Sara Sheikhzadeh-Eggers; Axel Stang; Stefan Schmiedel; Carsten Bokemeyer; Marylyn M Addo; Martin Aepfelbacher; Klaus Püschel; Stefan Kluge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Modified IMPROVE VTE Risk Score and Elevated D-Dimer Identify a High Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Acutely Ill Medical Population for Extended Thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  Alex C Spyropoulos; Concetta Lipardi; Jianfeng Xu; Colleen Peluso; Theodore E Spiro; Yoriko De Sanctis; Elliot S Barnathan; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  TH Open       Date:  2020-03-13

8.  Postdischarge thrombosis and hemorrhage in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Rushad Patell; Thomas Bogue; Anita Koshy; Poorva Bindal; Mwanasha Merrill; William C Aird; Kenneth A Bauer; Jeffrey I Zwicker
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Postdischarge venous thromboembolism following hospital admission with COVID-19.

Authors:  Lara N Roberts; Martin B Whyte; Loizos Georgiou; Gerard Giron; Julia Czuprynska; Catherine Rea; Bipin Vadher; Raj K Patel; Emma Gee; Roopen Arya
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 25.476

10.  Thrombotic complications and anticoagulation in COVID-19 pneumonia: a New York City hospital experience.

Authors:  Ahmad Hanif; Sumera Khan; Nikhitha Mantri; Sana Hanif; Muhamed Saleh; Yamini Alla; Siddharth Chinta; Nikee Shrestha; Wenyan Ji; Kristopher Attwood; Muhammad Adrish; Kevin R Jain
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 and thrombosis: searching for evidence.

Authors:  Bright Thilagar; Mohamad Beidoun; Ruben Rhoades; Scott Kaatz
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 2.  MPN and thrombosis was hard enough . . . now there's COVID-19 thrombosis too.

Authors:  Anna Falanga
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  Special Issue "COVID-19 and Venous Thromboembolism".

Authors:  Luca Costanzo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Venous and arterial thrombosis in COVID-19: An updated narrative review.

Authors:  Zainab Al Duhailib; Simon Oczkowski; Kamil Polok; Jakub Fronczek; Wojciech Szczeklik; Joshua Piticaru; Manoj J Mammen; Fayez Alshamsi; John Eikelboom; Emilie Belley-Cote; Waleed Alhazzani
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 7.537

5.  Commentary on the 2021 ASH Guidelines on use of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19 being discharged from the hospital.

Authors:  Alex C Spyropoulos; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-09-13

6.  Medically Ill hospitalized Patients for COVID-19 THrombosis Extended ProphyLaxis with rivaroxaban ThErapy: Rationale and Design of the MICHELLE Trial.

Authors:  Eduardo Ramacciotti; Leandro Barile Agati; Daniela Calderaro; Giuliano Giova Volpiani; Caroline Candida Carvalho de Oliveira; Valéria Cristina Resende Aguiar; Elizabeth Rodrigues; Marcone Lima Sobreira; Edwaldo Edner Joviliano; Cesar Dusilek; Kenji Itinose; Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis; André Sementilli Cortina; Suzanna Maria Viana Sanches; Nara Franzin de Moraes; Paulo Fernando Guimarães Morando Marzocchi Tierno; André Luiz Malavasi Longo de Oliveira; Adriano Tachibana; Rodrigo Caruso Chate; Marcus Vinícius Barbosa Santos; Bruno Bezerra de Menezes Cavalcante; Ricardo Cesar Rocha Moreira; Chang Chiann; Alfonso Tafur; Alex C Spyropoulos; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.099

7.  Anticoagulant therapy for COVID-19: What we have learned and what are the unanswered questions?

Authors:  Dimitrios Giannis; James D Douketis; Alex C Spyropoulos
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.487

Review 8.  Albumin Infusion in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: Hemodilution and Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Giuliano Ramadori
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Long-term follow-up of recovered MPN patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Tiziano Barbui; Alessandra Iurlo; Arianna Masciulli; Alessandra Carobbio; Arianna Ghirardi; Giuseppe Rossi; Claire Harrison; Alberto Alvarez-Larran; Elena Maria Elli; Jean-Jaques Kiladjian; Mercedes Gasior Kabat; Alberto Marin Sanchez; Francesca Palandri; Marcio Miguel Andrade-Campos; Alessandro Maria Vannucchi; Gonzalo Carreno-Tarragona; Petros Papadopoulos; Keina Quiroz Cervantes; Maria Angeles Foncillas; Maria Laura Fox; Miguel Sagues Serrano; Elisa Rumi; Santiago Osorio; Giulia Benevolo; Andrea Patriarca; Begona Navas Elorza; Valentin Garcia-Gutierrez; Elena Magro Mazo; Francesca Lunghi; Massimiliano Bonifacio; Valerio De Stefano; Juan Carlos Hernandez-Boluda; Emma Lopez Abadia; Anna Angona; Blanca Xicoy Cirici; Marco Ruggeri; Steffen Koschmieder; Marta Anna Sobas; Beatriz Cuevas; Daniele Cattaneo; Rosa Daffini; Marta Bellini; Natalia Curto-Garcia; Marta Garrote; Fabrizio Cavalca; Lina Benajiba; Beatriz Bellosillo; Paola Guglielmelli; Oscar Borsani; Silvia Betti; Silvia Salmoiraghi; Alessandro Rambaldi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 11.037

10.  Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 - Rationale and considerations.

Authors:  Sotirios Bristogiannis; Dawn Swan; Jecko Thachil
Journal:  Adv Biol Regul       Date:  2021-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.