| Literature DB >> 33823917 |
Oliver Treacy1,2, Kevin Lynch1,2, Nick Murphy1, Xizhe Chen1, Ellen Donohoe1, Aoife Canning1, Paul Lohan1, Georgina Shaw1, Gerry Fahy3, Aideen E Ryan1,2,4, Thomas Ritter5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systemic administration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has been efficacious in many inflammatory disease settings; however, little data are available on the potential immunomodulatory effects following local MSC administration in the context of corneal transplantation. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of subconjunctival injection of MSCs to promote corneal allograft survival.Entities:
Keywords: Allogeneic; Corneal transplantation; Graft survival; Immunomodulation; Macrophage; Mesenchymal stromal cells; Mouse; Subconjunctival
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33823917 PMCID: PMC8025388 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-021-02293-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Subconjunctival administration of allogeneic MSCs prolongs corneal allograft survival. Female Balb/c mice served as recipients for female C57BL/6 donor corneas. Different doses of allogeneic (donor-derived) MSCs were injected subconjunctivally 7 days before transplantation (D−7). Mice were observed every 2/3 days. a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis of allogeneic transplant controls (black line) (n = 9), corneal allograft + 5 × 105 MSCs (pink line) (n = 6), and corneal allograft + 5 × 104 MSCs (green line) (n = 4) (Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001). b Opacity and c neovascularization scores up to POD 40. d Representative light microscopy images of corneal allografts taken at two post-transplantation time points from two separate mice either treated with low-dose allo-MSCs or untreated. n = 4–6 with numbers per treatment group the same as in a. Error bars show mean + SD
Fig. 2Subconjunctival administration of low-dose allogeneic MSCs prolongs corneal allograft survival with pre-transplant injection the crucial factor. Female Balb/c mice served as recipients for female C57BL/6 donor corneas. Allogeneic MSCs were administered subconjunctivally using three different treatment strategies. Mice received one injection of 5 × 104 MSCs either the day before transplantation (D−1) or the day after transplantation (D+1) or two separate doses at D−1 and D+1. Control mice received PBS alone at D−1 and D+1. Mice were observed every 2/3 days. a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis of corneal allograft + PBS (D−1, D+1)-treated control mice (gray line) (n = 6), corneal allograft + 5 × 104 allogeneic MSCs (D−1, D+1) (green line) (n = 7), corneal allograft + 5 × 104 allogeneic MSCs (D+1) (blue line) (n = 7), corneal allograft + 5 × 104 allogeneic MSCs (D−1) (red line) (n = 8), and corneal allograft + 5 × 104 syngeneic MSCs (D−1, D+1) (black line) (n = 8) (Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01). b Opacity and c neovascularization scores up to POD 40. n = 6–8 with numbers per treatment group the same as in a. Error bars show mean + SD
Fig. 3Dual administration of low-dose allogeneic MSCs induces a higher proportion of anti-inflammatory mononuclear phagocytes in the draining lymph nodes. Draining lymph nodes (dLNs) were harvested 2 days post-transplantation (D+2) from corneal allograft recipient mice receiving either two injections of PBS or low-dose allogeneic MSCs the day before transplantation (D−1) and the day after transplantation (D+1). a Flow cytometry gating strategy used to select activated dendritic cells (DCs) (CD11c+MHCII+, CD11c+CD80+) or mononuclear phagocytes (MPh) with either a pro-inflammatory (CD11b+MHCII+, CD11b+CD80+) or an anti-inflammatory (CD11b+CD206+) phenotype. b Proportion of MHCII+ DCs expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD11c+) population. c Proportion of CD80+ DCs expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD11c+) population. d Proportion of MHCII+ MPh expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD11b+) population. e Proportion of CD80+ MPh expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD11b+) population. f Proportion of CD206+ MPh expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD11b+) population. g Analysis of mRNA expression (normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH and shown as fold-change relative to the PBS-treated allogeneic control group) in the dLNs of TGF-β1 at D+2 from PBS-treated allogeneic controls and low-dose allogeneic MSC-treated corneal allograft recipients. Error bars: mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 (each individual dot represents a separate animal, n = 3–6). D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test and Shapiro-Wilk normality test used to determine the distribution of data. ROUT testing was used to identify outliers. Non-parametric unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests used for data that was not normally distributed
Fig. 4Dual administration of low-dose allogeneic MSCs does not significantly alter the frequency of activated CD4+ T cells or regulatory T cells in the draining lymph nodes. Draining lymph nodes (dLNs) were harvested at D+2 from corneal allograft recipient mice receiving either two injections of PBS or low-dose allogeneic MSCs (D−1 and D+1). a Flow cytometry gating strategy used to select activated CD4+ T cells (CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD69+) or regulatory T cells (Tregs) (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+). b Proportion of CD69+ T cells expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD4+) population. c Proportion of CD25+ T cells expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD4+) population. d Proportion of CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs expressed as a percentage of the parent (CD4+) population. Error bars: mean ± SD (each individual dot represents a separate animal, n = 4–6). D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test and Shapiro-Wilk normality test used to determine distribution of data. ROUT testing was used to identify outliers. Non-parametric unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests used for data that was not normally distributed