Mohammad Abufaraj1,2, Zaid Eyadat3, Mohammed Qussay Al-Sabbagh4, Abdullah Nimer4, Immanuel Azaad Moonesar5, Lin Yang6,7,8, Walid Al Khatib3, Ra'eda Al-Qutob9. 1. Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan. mabufaraj@ju.ediu.jo. 2. Department of Urology, the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. mabufaraj@ju.ediu.jo. 3. Center of strategic studies, the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. 4. School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. 5. Health Administration & Policy, Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. 6. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada. 7. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 9. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has an inevitable burden on public health, potentially widening the gender gap in healthcare and the economy. We aimed to assess gender-based desparities during COVID-19 in Jordan in terms of health indices, mental well-being and economic burden. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 1300 participants ≥18 years living in Jordan were selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected via telephone interviews in this cross-sectional study. Chi-square was used to test age and gender differences according to demographics, economic burden, and health indices (access to healthcare, health insurance, antenatal and reproductive services). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the beta-coefficient (β) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of factors correlated with mental well-being, assessed by patients' health questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4). RESULTS: 656 (50.5%) men and 644 (49.5%) women completed the interview. Three-fourths of the participants had health insurance during the COVID-19 crisis. There was no significant difference in healthcare coverage or access between women and men (p > 0.05). Half of pregnant women were unable to access antenatal care. Gender was a significant predictor of higher PHQ-4 scores (women vs. men: β: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.54-1.22). Among women, age ≥ 60 years and being married were associated with significantly lower PHQ-4 scores. Only 0.38% of the overall participants lost their jobs; however, 8.3% reported a reduced payment. More women (13.89%) were not paid during the crisis as compared with men (6.92%) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no gender differences in healthcare coverage or access during the COVID-19 crisis generally. Women in Jordan are experiencing worse outcomes in terms of mental well-being and economic burden. Policymakers should give priority to women's mental health and antenatal and reproductive services. Financial security should be addressed in all Jordanian COVID-19 national plans because the crisis appears widening the gender gap in the economy.
BACKGROUND:COVID-19 has an inevitable burden on public health, potentially widening the gender gap in healthcare and the economy. We aimed to assess gender-based desparities during COVID-19 in Jordan in terms of health indices, mental well-being and economic burden. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 1300 participants ≥18 years living in Jordan were selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected via telephone interviews in this cross-sectional study. Chi-square was used to test age and gender differences according to demographics, economic burden, and health indices (access to healthcare, health insurance, antenatal and reproductive services). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the beta-coefficient (β) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of factors correlated with mental well-being, assessed by patients' health questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4). RESULTS: 656 (50.5%) men and 644 (49.5%) women completed the interview. Three-fourths of the participants had health insurance during the COVID-19 crisis. There was no significant difference in healthcare coverage or access between women and men (p > 0.05). Half of pregnant women were unable to access antenatal care. Gender was a significant predictor of higher PHQ-4 scores (women vs. men: β: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.54-1.22). Among women, age ≥ 60 years and being married were associated with significantly lower PHQ-4 scores. Only 0.38% of the overall participants lost their jobs; however, 8.3% reported a reduced payment. More women (13.89%) were not paid during the crisis as compared with men (6.92%) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no gender differences in healthcare coverage or access during the COVID-19 crisis generally. Women in Jordan are experiencing worse outcomes in terms of mental well-being and economic burden. Policymakers should give priority to women's mental health and antenatal and reproductive services. Financial security should be addressed in all Jordanian COVID-19 national plans because the crisis appears widening the gender gap in the economy.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Gender; Mental health; Psychological stress; Women health
Authors: Robyn R Gershon; Qi Zhi; Alexander F Chin; Ezinne M Nwankwo; Lisa M Gargano Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 1.385
Authors: Renato T Souza; Jose G Cecatti; Rodolfo C Pacagnella; Carolina C Ribeiro-Do-Valle; Adriana G Luz; Giuliane J Lajos; Guilherme M Nobrega; Thayna B Griggio; Charles M Charles; Silvana F Bento; Carla Silveira; Fernanda G Surita; Maria J Miele; Ricardo P Tedesco; Karayna G Fernandes; Sérgio H A Martins-Costa; Frederico J A Peret; Francisco E Feitosa; Rosiane Mattar; Evelyn Traina; Edson V Cunha Filho; Janete Vettorazzi; Samira M Haddad; Carla B Andreucci; José P Guida; Mario D Correa Junior; Marcos A B Dias; Leandro De Oliveira; Elias F Melo Junior; Marília G Q Luz; Maria Laura Costa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 4.996