Literature DB >> 33823836

Factors for the optimal selection of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor preparations and predictors for R-CHOP dose reductions/delays among patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (STOP FN in NHL 2 subanalysis).

Masahiro Yokoyama1, Yoshiharu Kusano2, Norihito Inoue2, Noriko Nishimura2, Yuko Mishima2, Tomoyuki Nukada3, Kiyohiko Hatake4, Yasuhito Terui2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A classification tree was used to analyze background factors for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) preparation selection for febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma receiving the first R-CHOP cycle.
METHODS: This was a subanalysis of the retrospective observational study STOP FN in NHL 2 (UMIN000029534). Patient characteristics, changes in neutrophil count, incidence and severity of neutropenia, and risk factors for dose reduction/delay of R-CHOP were assessed by G-CSF formulation.
RESULTS: Among 234 patients in cycle 1, 25.6% received no G-CSF preparation, 52.1% received daily G-CSF, and 22.2% received pegfilgrastim. Pegfilgrastim use was most frequent among patients aged ≥ 80 years, while that of daily G-CSF was most frequent in patients with lymphocyte count (LC) < 1000 cells/μL. Changes in neutrophil count were more marked with pegfilgrastim compared with daily G-CSF and no G-CSF. Relevant factors for G-CSF preparation selection in the first R-CHOP cycle were age ≥ 80 years and LC < 1000 cells/μL; for chemotherapy dose reduction were FN onset in cycle 1 and female sex; and for dose delay was hemoglobin (< 12 g/dL). After cycle 2 and onward, pegfilgrastim use increased markedly (72.6%) compared with cycle 1 (22.2%), with significantly greater proportions continuing pegfilgrastim use and switching from daily G-CSF.
CONCLUSION: Relevant factors for G-CSF preparation selection were age ≥ 80 years and LC < 1000 cells/μL. The use of pegfilgrastim increased markedly after cycle 2. These results may be useful for selecting appropriate G-CSF preparations in the first R-CHOP cycle. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000029534; registered on 13 October 2017, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000033733 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Febrile neutropenia; G-CSF; Non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma; R-CHOP; Risk factor

Year:  2021        PMID: 33823836     DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08068-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  11 in total

1.  Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Otavio A C Clark; Gary H Lyman; Aldemar A Castro; Luciana G O Clark; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  [Overview of guidelines for proper use of the G-CSF(2013 edition)].

Authors:  Katsuyuki Kiura
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2014-06

3.  Changing patterns of chemotherapy relative dose intensity and supportive care for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Jeffrey Crawford; Dianne Tomita; Sadie Whittaker; David C Dale
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-07-07

4.  Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy and its impact on outcomes in patients with early breast cancer or aggressive lymphoma.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Marcel Reiser
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy.

Authors:  Umberto Vitolo; Francesco Angrili; Lucy DeCosta; Sally Wetten; Massimo Federico
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Impact of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) on cancer treatment outcomes: An overview about well-established and recently emerging clinical data.

Authors:  Yassine Lalami; Jean Klastersky
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  The relationship between patient and tumor characteristics, patterns of breast cancer care, and 5-year survival among elderly women with incident breast cancer.

Authors:  Amanda L Kong; Ann B Nattinger; Emily McGinley; Liliana E Pezzin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katy L Cooper; Jason Madan; Sophie Whyte; Matt D Stevenson; Ron L Akehurst
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.