| Literature DB >> 33822580 |
Laura H Kwong1, Rob Wilson2, Shailabh Kumar3, Yoshika Susan Crider4,5, Yasmin Reyes Sanchez1, David Rempel6, Ajay Pillarisetti7.
Abstract
The World Health Organization and the United States Centers for Disease Control have recommended universal face masking by the general public to slow the spread of COVID-19. A number of recent studies have evaluated the filtration efficiency and pressure differential (an indicator of breathability) of various, widely available materials that the general public can use to make face masks at home. In this review, we summarize those studies to provide guidance for both the public to select the best materials for face masks and for future researchers to rigorously evaluate and report on mask material testing. Of the tested fabric materials and material combinations with adequate breathability, most single and multilayer combinations had a filtration efficiency of <30%. Most studies evaluating commonly available mask materials did not follow standard methods that would facilitate comparison across studies, and materials were often described with too few details to allow consumers to purchase equivalent materials to make their own masks. To improve the usability of future study results, researchers should use standard methods and report material characteristics in detail.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; breathability; cloth mask; face mask; filtration efficiency; homemade mask; pressure differential
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33822580 PMCID: PMC8900768 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c10146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Nano ISSN: 1936-0851 Impact factor: 15.881