Literature DB >> 33822131

Religious Accommodation in Bioethics and the Practice of Medicine.

William R Smith1, Robert Audi2.   

Abstract

Debates about the ethics of health care and medical research in contemporary pluralistic democracies often arise partly from competing religious and secular values. Such disagreements raise challenges of balancing claims of religious liberty with claims to equal treatment in health care. This paper proposes several mid-level principles to help in framing sound policies for resolving such disputes. We develop and illustrate these principles, exploring their application to conscientious objection by religious providers and religious institutions, accommodation of religious priorities in biomedical research, and treatment of patients' religious views in doctor-patient encounters. Given that no sound set of guiding principles yields precise solutions for every policy dispute, we explore how morally sound democracies might deliberatively resolve such policy issues, following our proposed principles. Taken together and carefully interpreted, these principles may help in guiding difficult decision making in the indefinitely large realm where government, medical providers, and patients encounter problems concerning religion and medicine.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conscience; mid-level principle; normative principles; professional obligations; religious accommodation; special obligations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33822131      PMCID: PMC8022927          DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  39 in total

1.  Informed consent for emergency contraception: variability in hospital care of rape victims.

Authors:  S S Smugar; B J Spina; J F Merz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  No view from nowhere: the challenge of grounding dignity without theology.

Authors:  Charles Camosy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Physicians, Not Conscripts - Conscientious Objection in Health Care.

Authors:  Ronit Y Stahl; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies.

Authors:  Udo Schuklenk; Ricardo Smalling
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Legitimacy in bioethics: challenging the orthodoxy.

Authors:  William R Smith
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Current controversies in brain death determination.

Authors:  Ariane Lewis; David Greer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  AMEN in challenging conversations: bridging the gaps between faith, hope, and medicine.

Authors:  Rhonda S Cooper; Anna Ferguson; Joann N Bodurtha; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  When there's a heartbeat: miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals.

Authors:  Lori R Freedman; Uta Landy; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Porcine and bovine surgical products: Jewish, Muslim, and Hindu perspectives.

Authors:  Catherine Easterbrook; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-04

10.  Doctors Have no Right to Refuse Medical Assistance in Dying, Abortion or Contraception.

Authors:  Julian Savulescu; Udo Schuklenk
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 1.898

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.