Literature DB >> 33822049

Podocalyxin is a key negative regulator of human endometrial epithelial receptivity for embryo implantation.

Sarah G Paule1, Sophea Heng1,2, Nirukshi Samarajeewa1,2, Ying Li1,2, Mary Mansilla1,2, Andrew I Webb3, Thomas Nebl3, Steven L Young4, Bruce A Lessey5, M Louise Hull6, Maxine Scelwyn7, Rebecca Lim8,9, Beverley Vollenhoven9,10, Luk J Rombauts9,10, Guiying Nie1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How is endometrial epithelial receptivity, particularly adhesiveness, regulated at the luminal epithelial surface for embryo implantation in the human? SUMMARY ANSWER: Podocalyxin (PCX), a transmembrane protein, was identified as a key negative regulator of endometrial epithelial receptivity; specific downregulation of PCX in the luminal epithelium in the mid-secretory phase, likely mediated by progesterone, may act as a critical step in converting endometrial surface from a non-receptive to an implantation-permitting state. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The human endometrium must undergo major molecular and cellular changes to transform from a non-receptive to a receptive state to accommodate embryo implantation. However, the fundamental mechanisms governing receptivity, particularly at the luminal surface where the embryo first interacts with, are not well understood. A widely held view is that upregulation of adhesion-promoting molecules is important, but the details are not well characterized. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study first aimed to identify novel adhesion-related membrane proteins with potential roles in receptivity in primary human endometrial epithelial cells (HEECs). Further experiments were then conducted to determine candidates' in vivo expression pattern in the human endometrium across the menstrual cycle, regulation by progesterone using cell culture, and functional importance in receptivity using in vitro human embryo attachment and invasion models. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Primary HEECs (n = 9) were isolated from the proliferative phase endometrial tissue, combined into three pools, subjected to plasma membrane protein enrichment by ultracentrifugation followed by proteomics analysis, which led to the discovery of PCX as a novel candidate of interest. Immunohistochemical analysis determined the in vivo expression pattern and cellular localization of PCX in the human endometrium across the menstrual cycle (n = 23). To investigate whether PCX is regulated by progesterone, the master driver of endometrial differentiation, primary HEECs were treated in culture with estradiol and progesterone and analyzed by RT-PCR (n = 5) and western blot (n = 4). To demonstrate that PCX acts as a negative regulator of receptivity, PCX was overexpressed in Ishikawa cells (a receptive line) and the impact on receptivity was determined using in vitro attachment (n = 3-5) and invasion models (n = 4-6), in which an Ishikawa monolayer mimicked the endometrial surface and primary human trophoblast spheroids mimicked embryos. Mann-Whitney U-test and ANOVA analyses established statistical significance at *P ≤ 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: PCX was expressed on the apical surface of all epithelial and endothelial cells in the non-receptive endometrium, but selectively downregulated in the luminal epithelium from the mid-secretory phase coinciding with the establishment of receptivity. Progesterone was confirmed to be able to suppress PCX in primary HEECs, suggesting this hormone likely mediates the downregulation of luminal PCX in vivo for receptivity. Overexpression of PCX in Ishikawa monolayer inhibited not only the attachment but also the penetration of human embryo surrogates, demonstrating that PCX acts as an important negative regulator of epithelial receptivity for implantation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Primary HEECs isolated from the human endometrial tissue contained a mixture of luminal and glandular epithelial cells, as further purification into subtypes was not possible due to the lack of specific markers. Future study would need to investigate how progesterone differentially regulates PCX in endometrial epithelial subtypes. In addition, this study used primary human trophoblast spheroids as human embryo mimics and Ishikawa as endometrial epithelial cells in functional models, future studies with human blastocysts and primary epithelial cells would further validate the findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The findings of this study add important new knowledge to the understanding of human endometrial remodeling for receptivity. The identification of PCX as a negative regulator of epithelial receptivity and the knowledge that its specific downregulation in the luminal epithelium coincides with receptivity development may provide new avenues to assess endometrial receptivity and individualize endometrial preparation protocols in assisted reproductive technology (ART). The study also discovered PCX as progesterone target in HEECs, identifying a potentially useful functional biomarker to monitor progesterone action, such as in the optimization of progesterone type/dose/route of administration for luteal support. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Study funding was obtained from ESHRE, Monash IVF and NHMRC. LR reports potential conflict of interests (received grants from Ferring Australia; personal fees from Monash IVF Group and Ferring Australia; and non-financial support from Merck Serono, MSD, and Guerbet outside the submitted work. LR is also a minority shareholder and the Group Medical Director for Monash IVF Group, a provider of fertility preservation services). The remaining authors have no potential conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCPL1; PCX; PODXL; embryo implantation; endometrium; epithelial cells; podocalyxin; receptivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33822049      PMCID: PMC9432137          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.353


  60 in total

Review 1.  The endometrium as a cause of implantation failure.

Authors:  Andrew M Sharkey; Stephen K Smith
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Early stages of implantation as revealed by an in vitro model.

Authors:  H Singh; L Nardo; S J Kimber; J D Aplin
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 3.  Assessment of endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Revisiting the housekeeping genes of human placental development and insufficiency syndromes.

Authors:  S Drewlo; K Levytska; J Kingdom
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Effect on endometrial histology and pharmacokinetics of different dose regimens of progesterone vaginal pessaries, in comparison with progesterone vaginal gel and placebo.

Authors:  I J M Duijkers; I Klingmann; R Prinz; M Wargenau; S Hrafnsdottir; Th B Magnusdottir; C Klipping
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Proprotein convertase 5/6 is critical for embryo implantation in women: regulating receptivity by cleaving EBP50, modulating ezrin binding, and membrane-cytoskeletal interactions.

Authors:  Sophea Heng; Ana Cervero; Carlos Simon; Andrew N Stephens; Ying Li; Jin Zhang; Sarah Paule; Adam Rainczuk; Harmeet Singh; Alicia Quinonero; Alejandro Tapia; Luis Velasquez; Lois Salamonsen; Luk J F Rombauts; Guiying Nie
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 7.  Fertile ground: human endometrial programming and lessons in health and disease.

Authors:  Jemma Evans; Lois A Salamonsen; Amy Winship; Ellen Menkhorst; Guiying Nie; Caroline E Gargett; Eva Dimitriadis
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 43.330

8.  The CD34-related molecule podocalyxin is a potent inducer of microvillus formation.

Authors:  Julie S Nielsen; Marcia L Graves; Shierley Chelliah; A Wayne Vogl; Calvin D Roskelley; Kelly M McNagny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Decreased MUC1 in endometrium is an independent receptivity marker in recurrent implantation failure during implantation window.

Authors:  Fangrong Wu; Xiaoyan Chen; Yingyu Liu; Bo Liang; Hui Xu; Tin Chiu Li; Chi Chiu Wang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Christophe Blockeel; Gennady T Sukhikh; Ameet Patki; Bharati Dhorepatil; Dong-Zi Yang; Zi-Jiang Chen; Elke Kahler; Claire Pexman-Fieth; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  4 in total

1.  Three-dimensional measurement and analysis of morphological parameters of the uterus in infertile women.

Authors:  Yankun Feng; Shaojing Zhang; Ying Zhou; Guibing He; Liting Hong; Li Shi; Jianmei Wang; Ping Zhang; Lidong Zhai
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

2.  High-Throughput In Vitro Screening Identified Nemadipine as a Novel Suppressor of Embryo Implantation.

Authors:  Xian Chen; Sudini Ranshaya Fernando; Yin-Lau Lee; William Shu-Biu Yeung; Ernest Hung-Yu Ng; Raymond Hang-Wun Li; Kai-Fai Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  MicroRNAs in the Regulation of Endometrial Receptivity for Embryo Implantation.

Authors:  Manizha Shekibi; Sophea Heng; Guiying Nie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Podocalyxin promotes an impermeable epithelium and inhibits pro-implantation factors to negatively regulate endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Sophea Heng; Nirukshi Samarajeewa; Yao Wang; Sarah G Paule; James Breen; Guiying Nie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.