Literature DB >> 33821382

The Litigation Complexity of Posttraumatic Headaches.

Jack E Hubbard1,2, Samuel D Hodge3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the workings of the legal process in posttraumatic headache (PTH) claims by discussing representative court cases, the approaches taken by both plaintiff and defense attorneys in evaluating a client with PTH, and the role of the expert witness. This discussion also examines the question of whether or not litigation prolongs the symptoms of PTH and concussion, looking at the issues of malingering and the psychological effect of litigation. RECENT
FINDINGS: Litigation prolongs recovery of PTH, primarily not from malingering but rather due to the psychological mindset of the plaintiff as created by the litigation process. Just as the medical community struggles with PTH diagnosis, mechanism, and treatment, the legal system grapples with identifying valid claims for PTH. Psychological support is an important component for PTH recovery to more effectively deal with the psychological impact of litigation and the concept of perceived injustice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concussion; Headache; Litigation; Medical-legal; Posttraumatic

Year:  2021        PMID: 33821382     DOI: 10.1007/s11916-021-00954-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep        ISSN: 1534-3081


  2 in total

Review 1.  Post-traumatic headache: is it for real? Crossfire debates on headache: pro.

Authors:  Mark Obermann; Matthias Keidel; Hans-Christoph Diener
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.887

2.  Outcomes after Concussion Recovery Education: Effects of Litigation and Disability Status on Maintenance of Symptoms.

Authors:  Robin A Hanks; Lisa J Rapport; Katharine Seagly; Scott R Millis; Carolyn Scott; Claire Pearson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.269

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.