Literature DB >> 3382120

Bioactive glass-ceramics in middle ear surgery. An 8-year review.

R Reck1, S Störkel, A Meyer.   

Abstract

An 8-year follow-up of Ceravital middle ear prostheses showed there was extremely good tolerance in the middle ear space. Incompatibility phenomena were not observed, and inflammatory reactions were neither caused nor supported by the implants. The tympanoplasties were always performed without interposition of cartilage between the tympanic membrane or the tympanic membrane graft and the disk-shaped portion of the implant, and extrusions were never observed. Long-lasting inflammatory processes appeared to destroy implants the same way they destroy ossicles. Transient inflammatory periods (such as episodes of purulent otitis media, which occurred soon after the prostheses were implanted) did not lead to any remarkable changes of the surface of the implant. In healthy middle ears, the hearing results were stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3382120     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb38504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bioactive-glass in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Corrado Profeta; Christoph Huppa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-05-21

2.  PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huiqian Yu; Yingzi He; Yusu Ni; Yunfeng Wang; Na Lu; Huawei Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Mastoid Cavity Obliteration with Cartilage Graft; Evaluation of 35 Patients.

Authors:  M Tayyar Kalcioglu; Ali Ozerk; Oguz Kadir Egilmez; Numan Kokten; Lokman Uzun; Yuksel Toplu; Muhammet Tekin
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2019-12-26

4.  Passive and active middle ear implants.

Authors:  Dirk Beutner; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

Review 5.  Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Francesco Baino; Sepideh Hamzehlou; Saeid Kargozar
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-03-19

6.  A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Efficacy of Nanohydroxyapatite (Sybograf™) versus Bioactive Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty (Novabone®) in the Treatment of Human Periodontal Infrabony Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sravani Koduru; Suchetha Aghanashini; Sapna Nadiger; S M Apoorva; Divya Bhat; Bhavana Puvvalla
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Emerging zero-dimensional to four-dimensional biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Haoyu Fang; Daoyu Zhu; Qianhao Yang; Yixuan Chen; Changqing Zhang; Junjie Gao; Youshui Gao
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 10.435

8.  Platelet-Rich Plasma in Reconstruction of Posterior Meatal Wall after Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad El-Sayed Abd Elbary; Wail Fayez Nasr; Samir Sorour Sorour
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.