Alexandra J Mihalek1,2, Christopher J Russell3,2, Amir Hassan3, Mei Yu Yeh4, Susan Wu. 1. Division of Hospital Medicine and amihalek@choc.org. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 3. Division of Hospital Medicine and. 4. The Saban Research Institute and Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute Biostatistics Core, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized children are underimmunized, yet little is known about current systems supporting inpatient vaccination. We aim to describe national pediatric inpatient immunization practices and determine if variation exists among adolescent, childhood, and influenza vaccines. METHODS: An electronic survey regarding hospital vaccination practices was sent to physician, nurse, and pharmacy leaders via the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network in spring 2019. Hospitals reported the presence of various practices to support inpatient vaccination stratified by vaccine type: tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis, meningococcal, human papillomavirus, childhood series, and influenza. One-way analysis of variance testing compared differences in numbers of practices and χ2 tests compared proportions of sites reporting each practice between vaccine types. Qualitative responses were evaluated via content analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one of 103 eligible hospitals completed the survey (50%). Standardized policies existed in 92% of hospitals for influenza, 41% for childhood, and 29% for adolescent vaccines. Hospitals identified an average of 5.1 practices to deliver influenza vaccines, compared with 1.5 for childhood; 0.9 for tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis; 0.7 for meningococcal; and 0.6 for human papillomavirus vaccines (P < .001). Standardized screening tools, visual prompts, standing orders, nurse- or pharmacy-driven screening or ordering, staff education, and quality improvement projects were reported more often for influenza vaccines than other vaccine types (P < .01 for all comparisons). Common barriers to delivery included communication difficulties, lack of systems optimization, and parent and provider discomfort with inpatient immunization. CONCLUSIONS: Existing hospital infrastructure supports influenza vaccine delivery over other vaccine types, potentially creating missed inpatient vaccination opportunities.
BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized children are underimmunized, yet little is known about current systems supporting inpatient vaccination. We aim to describe national pediatric inpatient immunization practices and determine if variation exists among adolescent, childhood, and influenza vaccines. METHODS: An electronic survey regarding hospital vaccination practices was sent to physician, nurse, and pharmacy leaders via the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings Network in spring 2019. Hospitals reported the presence of various practices to support inpatient vaccination stratified by vaccine type: tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis, meningococcal, human papillomavirus, childhood series, and influenza. One-way analysis of variance testing compared differences in numbers of practices and χ2 tests compared proportions of sites reporting each practice between vaccine types. Qualitative responses were evaluated via content analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-one of 103 eligible hospitals completed the survey (50%). Standardized policies existed in 92% of hospitals for influenza, 41% for childhood, and 29% for adolescent vaccines. Hospitals identified an average of 5.1 practices to deliver influenza vaccines, compared with 1.5 for childhood; 0.9 for tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis; 0.7 for meningococcal; and 0.6 for human papillomavirus vaccines (P < .001). Standardized screening tools, visual prompts, standing orders, nurse- or pharmacy-driven screening or ordering, staff education, and quality improvement projects were reported more often for influenza vaccines than other vaccine types (P < .01 for all comparisons). Common barriers to delivery included communication difficulties, lack of systems optimization, and parent and provider discomfort with inpatient immunization. CONCLUSIONS: Existing hospital infrastructure supports influenza vaccine delivery over other vaccine types, potentially creating missed inpatient vaccination opportunities.
Authors: Dana M Foradori; Esther M Sampayo; S Aya Fanny; Meera K Namireddy; Anjali M Kumar; Huay-Ying Lo Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: JoAnna K Leyenaar; Shawn L Ralston; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Penelope S Pekow; Rita Mangione-Smith; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Holly A Hill; James A Singleton; David Yankey; Laurie D Elam-Evans; S Cassandra Pingali; Yoonjae Kang Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 17.586