| Literature DB >> 33820543 |
Hanli Dang1, Tao Zhang1, Zhongke Wang1, Guifang Li1, Wenqin Zhao1, Xinhua Lv1, Li Zhuang2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; Endophytic fungi; High-throughput sequencing; Medicinal licorice; Plant growth; Secondary metabolites
Year: 2021 PMID: 33820543 PMCID: PMC8022407 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-02942-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Secondary metabolites content in the root of three licorices species changed with the growth period. Description: Bar charts (mean with standard error) with different lower-case letters represented a significant difference (P < 0.05) was assessed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s statistic test for multiple comparisons. The same letter indicates no significant difference (P > 0.05). Abbreviations: GIA, GTF and LI mean glycyrrhizic acid, liquiritin and total flavonoid, respectively
Effect of growth years on the soil physical and chemical properties
| Variables | 1 year | 2 year | 3 year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil Physicochemical Properties | SOM (g/kg) | 4.477 ± 0.496 | 5.186 ± 0.573 | 4.835 ± 0.718 |
| STN (g/kg) | 0.382 ± 0.070 | 0.442 ± 0.047 | 0.403 ± 0.054 | |
| STP (g/kg) | 0.435 ± 0.029 | 0.498 ± 0.041 | 0.434 ± 0.024 | |
| STK (g/kg) | ||||
| TS (g/kg) | ||||
| SNN (mg/kg) | ||||
| SAN (mg/kg) | ||||
| SAP (mg/kg) | 4.437 ± 1.104 | 2.899 ± 0.337 | 5.272 ± 0.908 | |
| SAK (mg/kg) | 102.452 ± 12.736 | 128.569 ± 8.422 | 96.456 ± 10.658 | |
| SWC (%) | 3.574 ± 0.380 | 3.438 ± 0.349 | 2.795 ± 0.236 | |
| PH | 8.462 ± 0.072 | 8.429 ± 0.087 | 8.389 ± 0.056 |
Description: Value is Mean ± standard error, different lower-case letters represented a significant difference (P < 0.05) was assessed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s statistic test for multiple comparisons, the same letter indicates no significant difference (P > 0.05)
Pearson correlation analysis of the content of secondary metabolites with soil physicochemical properties
| GIA | GTF | LI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOM | 0.317 | 0.172 | 0.274 |
| STN | 0.243 | 0.071 | 0.202 |
| STP | 0.248 | 0.101 | 0.205 |
| STK | −0.156 | 0.033 | −0.251 |
| SNN | −0.270 | −0.625** | − 0.171 |
| SAP | 0.347 | −0.023 | 0.440* |
| SAK | −0.160 | 0.101 | −0.246 |
| PH | −0.075 | − 0.218 | −0.048 |
| SWC | −0.311 | −0.092 | − 0.381 |
Description: the values are the Pearson correlation coefficients. The correlation coefficient r of Pearson is between −1 and 1, r < 0 is negative correlation, r > 0 is positive correlation. ** means P < 0.01; * means P < 0.05
Fig. 2An analysis of Alpha diversity indices based on Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Description: The * represented a significant difference (p < 0.05) assessed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test for analysis. Ordinate is Alpha diversity index (Shannon index and ACE index), where (a) (b) represents the endophytic fungal community and (c) (d) represents the AMF community. Abscissa is the group name (E, R and S: years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; W, G and D: Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Glycyrrhiza glabra, and Glycyrrhiza inflata, respectively)
Fig. 3Beta diversity analysis of endophytic fungal community based on weighted UniFrac distance. Description: (a) Non-Metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis, which each point in the diagram represents a sample, and samples from the same group are represented in the same color. The lower Stress (< 0.2) indicates that NMDS can accurately reflect the degree of difference between samples. (b) The significance test of the differences of Beta diversity, which the * represented a significant difference (p < 0.05) assessed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test for analysis. Ordinate is the Beta diversity; abscissa is the group name that has identical meanings as described in Fig. 2
Fig. 4Distribution difference of AMF community. Description: The petal diagram (a) and Venn diagram (b) based on operational taxonomic units (OTU), which represent common or unique OTUs to a given group. Group name has identical meanings as described in Fig. 2. The Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) plot based on weighted unifrac distances for year 1, 2, 3 group (c), which each point in the diagram represents a sample, and samples from the same group are represented in the same color
Fig. 5Histograms of relative abundance of the top 10 endophytic fungi at the phylum (a) level of taxonomy and at the genera (b) level of taxonomy. Description: (a) and (b) Ordinate both are the relative abundance of species, others mean less or not annotated; abscissa is the group name that has identical meanings as described in Fig. 2
Fig. 6Histograms of relative abundance of the top 10 arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi phylum (a) and genera (b). Description: Abscissa is the relative abundance of species; others mean less or not annotated; Ordinate is the group name that has identical meanings as described in Fig. 2
Fig. 7Linear discriminant analysis effect size (Lefse) analysis of differences in AMF community composition as a function of growth period. Description: In cladograms, the circle radiating from inside to outside represents the taxonomic level from the Phylum to the species. Each small circle at a different taxonomic level represents microbial groups that were significantly enriched in the corresponding groups and that significantly influenced the differences between groups, and the diameter of the small circle is proportionate to the relative abundance of species. Light yellow small circle represents microbial groups with no significant differences. Group name that has identical meanings as described in Fig. 2
Fig. 8Relationship between secondary metabolites and soil physical and chemical properties and microbial community. Description: Heat maps of spearman correlation analysis between the top 20 OTUs, secondary metabolite and soil properties with (a) corresponding to Endophytic fungal community and (c) corresponding to AMF community, respectively. The mark * is significance test p < 0.05. Db-RDA analysis based on OTU levels that mainly used to reflect the relationship between microorganisms and environmental factors. Endophytic fungal community and AMF community corresponding to (b) (d), respectively
Mantel test on the correlations between the relative abundance of OTUs and soil or root variables
| Variable | Endophytic Fungi | Soil AMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOM + STN + STP + STK + SNN + SAN + SAP+SAK + TS + PH + SWC | 0.119 | 0.158 | 0.038 | 0.785 |
| RWC + GlA + GTF + LI | 0.209 | 0.024 | 0.358 | 0.003 |
| STN + STP + STK | 0.075 | 0.776 | 0.063 | 0.533 |
| SOM + SNN + SAN + SAP+SAK + TS + PH + SWC | 0.178 | 0.075 | 0.038 | 0.806 |
| GlA + GTF + LI | 0.273 | 0.014 | 0.110 | 0.200 |
| GlA + GTF + LI + STN + STP + STK | 0.007 | 0.522 | 0.065 | 0.634 |
| GlA + GTF + LI + SOM + SNN + SAN + SAP+SAK + TS + PH + SWC | 0.168 | 0.080 | 0.046 | 0.736 |
Description: Variable is the information of environmental factors. r is the correlation coefficient, the larger r value is, the greater the correlation between environmental factors and species abundance information is. P value is the p-value of significance test. P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance