Literature DB >> 3381993

[Suppression of blood pressure increases during intubation: lidocaine or fentanyl?].

M Bachofen1.   

Abstract

The hypertensive response to anesthetic induction with endotracheal intubation may be harmful in patients with cardiovascular disease, increased intracranial pressure, or anomalies of the cerebral vessels. Recommendations for attenuating the reflex hypertension and tachycardia elicited by upper airway irritation are therefore manifold. Besides minimizing the cardiovascular response, anesthesia induction for patients at risk must also satisfy the following requirements: it must be applicable regardless of patient collaboration, prevent impairment of cerebral blood flow, and avoid arousal of the patient; it should neither be time-consuming nor affect the duration or modality of the ensuing anesthesia. Among the recommended procedures, intravenous lidocaine or fentanyl appear to best fulfill the above mentioned criteria. However, our own equivocal observations and controversial results in the literature concerning the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine prompted us to reinvestigate the issue in two well-defined patient groups. In 46 patients with intracranial vessel malformations and 78 patients with brain tumors, blood pressure responses to endotracheal intubation were studied under anesthesia induction with 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine or 6 micrograms/kg fentanyl i.v. 30 s before thiopental injection or 2-3 min before intubation. The two equally simple induction procedures were compared to anesthesia induction with thiopental alone. In both patient groups no significant effect of lidocaine on the pressure response could be observed. Fentanyl lowered the pressure response slightly though significantly in brain-tumor patients only (p less than 0.05), but showed a significant pressure-lowering action persisting over the whole observation period in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3381993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of fentanyl and clonidine for attenuation of the haemodynamic response to laryngocopy and endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  K V Srinivasan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-11-10

2.  Attenuation of Cardiovascular Responses to Direct Laryngoscopy and Intubation-A Comparative Study Between iv Bolus Fentanyl, Lignocaine and Placebo(NS).

Authors:  Md Asif Aleem; M N Awati; S Adarsh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-12-15

3.  Attenuation of the pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with intravenous dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate under bispectral index-controlled anaesthesia: A placebo-controlled prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Lakshmi Mahajan; Manjot Kaur; Ruchi Gupta; Kuljeet Singh Aujla; Avtar Singh; Ashreen Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-05

Review 4.  Rapid Sequence Intubation in Traumatic Brain-injured Adults.

Authors:  Nicholas Kramer; David Lebowitz; Michael Walsh; Latha Ganti
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-04-25

5.  Intravenous Low Dose Fentanyl versus Lignocaine in Attenuating the Hemodynamic Responses during Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Authors:  Ranjithkumar R Thippeswamy; Supreeth R Shetty
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

6.  Comparison between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl bolus in attenuating the stress response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  Aditya P Mahiswar; Prakash K Dubey; Alok Ranjan
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-05-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.