| Literature DB >> 33819097 |
David R Nerenz1, J Matthew Austin2, Daniel Deutscher3, Karen E Joynt Maddox4, Eugene J Nuccio5, Christie Teigland6, Eric Weinhandl7, Laurent G Glance8.
Abstract
Risk adjustment of quality measures using clinical risk factors is widely accepted; risk adjustment using social risk factors remains controversial. We argue here that social risk adjustment is appropriate and necessary in defined circumstances and that social risk adjustment should be the default option when there are valid empirical arguments for and against adjustment for a given measure. Social risk adjustment is an important way to avoid exacerbating inequity in the health care system.Year: 2021 PMID: 33819097 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301